From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBD0BA0524;
	Mon, 19 Apr 2021 19:45:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B76A44141B;
	Mon, 19 Apr 2021 19:45:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-pj1-f41.google.com (mail-pj1-f41.google.com
 [209.85.216.41]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4687413B0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 19:45:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-pj1-f41.google.com with SMTP id
 kb13-20020a17090ae7cdb02901503d67f0beso6235449pjb.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 19 Apr 2021 10:45:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references
 :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=tuLm6af6J7HLbJDcNf/J/W/i2XX7M2XCGcwDXAEXjZc=;
 b=Heuqi1VFm36B5UvBI9t+8e8A/zFnOBx7LDfshKbXd3eZSUcsuehoLyQhzm5pdxAqHT
 F70VqwvvwarVxKX55c7Oa6G7aCgbx276PvWyp7sKiIwogGQxxrlrf6uW4YUnLVSipSvJ
 9WmhLYKj/cWsRkSRIGyE30JzjzLPgcv/FJJQGnQHyHRayLxpUQ+UN+kONVXJ8fuVKLDo
 7aAFAQYCu2gBwmXmJ5NWK/WkJxKrT/dV4N0eSRpBQntPoPOrjVpZlfXt4iPTQ5Zv6Zff
 Hi/YsnnpEGNWeFTXj+4ncX7eKCN4jFXUvwRYELCKjU6Lo7fAtIHt4pn5Rnm3IsXpPD0T
 00bQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
 :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=tuLm6af6J7HLbJDcNf/J/W/i2XX7M2XCGcwDXAEXjZc=;
 b=UZN1tZwXtHR4SyHwSqeWsKFoCAuPfcg5XdB9DUL/ZXUm6eNItKlFppHh6jiEGQQYon
 z0PyjX53UdNsYDKd4SwmfnktjzDLwyM4OL0tLNXdcc2ZFDKcKFuOUAUGzhwVWwo6ur8f
 ZhDzKSF6NMoDqdkU7i3YVKVuIj80FKT0L5L8vSkSqRqH5mVQygYNXGpYufQIvQRlzOdt
 RnvQxf1f+PmQ30xYcvEAjG8m/secsFseSfwO1w04e7kWqszrQZZuIM5GvvpXFUk4mFaq
 pPX8orB+lJMhW0UXpP3jrqbg2FV6ZMzNzUP13h2pTxCyLS/7bsHDAtp6FJL5oJqBm1pr
 gJvw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533KE3hT3Ibg0qn8jMN3/UHEc+7Kyyh3wIaKUU/pmcOn5LD3XgSQ
 4DB+zD+ypZe31FhJPp+cyhGbdQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy17QTS82ciyDdudS0QxNO0dx4xqVVBPsmjR6Aoxo1pT9uYCFmQbhLqdJtZcxPQSF0UnqHPcg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e34b:b029:ec:9a57:9cba with SMTP id
 p11-20020a170902e34bb02900ec9a579cbamr10469038plc.56.1618854315147; 
 Mon, 19 Apr 2021 10:45:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hermes.local (76-14-218-44.or.wavecable.com. [76.14.218.44])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k21sm12864938pfi.28.2021.04.19.10.45.14
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Mon, 19 Apr 2021 10:45:14 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 10:45:06 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, suanmingm@nvidia.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com,
 andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru
Message-ID: <20210419104506.2f12283a@hermes.local>
In-Reply-To: <1869905.GZgYhOu6rl@thomas>
References: <20210315192722.35490-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
 <20210315192722.35490-2-stephen@networkplumber.org>
 <1869905.GZgYhOu6rl@thomas>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: make flow API primary/secondary
 process safe
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 19:14:08 +0200
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:

> About the title, better to say "multi-process" and do not
> commit on being completely safe for the whole API.
> It is just fixing the mutex for multi-process,
> and this mutex is for driver not being natively multi-thread.
>=20
> The compilation fails on MinGW:
> error: implicit declaration of function =E2=80=98pthread_mutexattr_init=
=E2=80=99


Sorry, don't have all the variants. How do you handle the lack of
compatibility on Windows.