From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A580BA0547; Wed, 19 May 2021 18:27:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31DD140041; Wed, 19 May 2021 18:27:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595B64003F for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 18:27:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE82C5C017D; Wed, 19 May 2021 12:27:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 19 May 2021 12:27:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; s=fm1; bh=7z3ErMLVzOilN6JkcKqzcfc1l4 IFrM+xrgsVhJmO4yg=; b=cfu0kjdSJ+8+S8zJ5bQaGr+OxWQeazmN7BiUyNxuJs 8MYdmawR1wrCnO9w12I8BQQFWb1ictn4zP6C3lMNjMWLfpi26tySRsm0MUmh0kgg VeZTfytif+1l7xHNrPgkC4XDZLCwNogM8smBc7+UMzHNPPr4rETuP0S3LTFe70pb keV9duzhP69zUdE9sUBxJ+bJihyxTLDZPlVN1zz9143OLUihHkaSUJt5clowQetH Dj+C87tKNBfTOgjZZxzblDuDpRpxJaox0D3KrwZAdP682srWWX8+fk58QO8o5AYW iUSjLnHB1UB5u0N6QokJ2UEnGcFGNsvUeHanmheZhu7g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:date:from :message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=7z3ErMLVzOilN6Jkc Kqzcfc1l4IFrM+xrgsVhJmO4yg=; b=qv3MtcdBWXMuPHQX5aL1mQW9gUGtkBLhZ Xq1YpW+toye5kRlNIJAXtfX1JrM40SYNgQgM7AJP1ViU3GMjjYPrCrRjp7Ta6tbY vFh6D4xsjLnY8OKPsUcbHivJ2B4nbfiqCiJMe7KeUWpgJ8h8mEgVzf5fUL6Zqi31 wONYK7+zKVKtlVLCukMbMCaFszvlsdaWuulRyk5iyVQCeMR2Qt840GZ3gPAq+n1y Ea61rN+S8GJy7hRzTrBdrbSBwrAZ1WlOZYv2xMGM9KRqMULK/kiLx72ik5BM2Bp9 sODzPdhO8HQavJBKebih+hOpnjRF29jlvbILzwVyAAUYfok2EfIQg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdeiledguddttdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvffufffkofgggfestdekredtredttdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpedvledvudehvdduudevuedvveehgeduleegiefgjeehudehtddtgedu ffejiefhgfenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuih iivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhho nhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.monjalon.net (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 19 May 2021 12:27:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: ferruh.yigit@intel.com, Ori Kam , Andrew Rybchenko , Ajit Khaparde Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 18:27:25 +0200 Message-Id: <20210519162725.2179226-1-thomas@monjalon.net> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: fix comments of packet integrity flow item X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" The Doxygen comments are placed before the related lines, but the markers were /**< instead of /** Fixes: b10a421a1f3b ("ethdev: add packet integrity check flow rules") Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon --- lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h index 94c8c1ccc8..d7e0082dc7 100644 --- a/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h +++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_flow.h @@ -1708,7 +1708,7 @@ rte_flow_item_geneve_opt_mask = { #endif struct rte_flow_item_integrity { - /**< Tunnel encapsulation level the item should apply to. + /** Tunnel encapsulation level the item should apply to. * @see rte_flow_action_rss */ uint32_t level; @@ -1716,21 +1716,21 @@ struct rte_flow_item_integrity { union { __extension__ struct { - /**< The packet is valid after passing all HW checks. */ + /** The packet is valid after passing all HW checks. */ uint64_t packet_ok:1; - /**< L2 layer is valid after passing all HW checks. */ + /** L2 layer is valid after passing all HW checks. */ uint64_t l2_ok:1; - /**< L3 layer is valid after passing all HW checks. */ + /** L3 layer is valid after passing all HW checks. */ uint64_t l3_ok:1; - /**< L4 layer is valid after passing all HW checks. */ + /** L4 layer is valid after passing all HW checks. */ uint64_t l4_ok:1; - /**< L2 layer CRC is valid. */ + /** L2 layer CRC is valid. */ uint64_t l2_crc_ok:1; - /**< IPv4 layer checksum is valid. */ + /** IPv4 layer checksum is valid. */ uint64_t ipv4_csum_ok:1; - /**< L4 layer checksum is valid. */ + /** L4 layer checksum is valid. */ uint64_t l4_csum_ok:1; - /**< The l3 length is smaller than the frame length. */ + /** L3 length is smaller than frame length. */ uint64_t l3_len_ok:1; uint64_t reserved:56; }; -- 2.31.1