As discussed in the technical board meeting https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2021-February/200012.html This is to record that new upstreamed devices tested adequately. Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> --- CC: John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com> Cc: dev@dpdk.org --- content/testing/_index.md | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/content/testing/_index.md b/content/testing/_index.md index fcdc47feca9a..3e430f8640af 100644 --- a/content/testing/_index.md +++ b/content/testing/_index.md @@ -116,6 +116,10 @@ some validation reports are requested to the community members. Such release validations are sent as replies to the release announcement. +It is not easy (or not possible at all) to test PMDs other than device vendors, +that is why it is expected vendors send a release validation report at least in +the first release that the PMD is upstreamed. + ## Tools --- -- 2.31.1
2021-06-24 15:45 (UTC+0100), Ferruh Yigit: > As discussed in the technical board meeting > https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2021-February/200012.html > > This is to record that new upstreamed devices tested adequately. > > Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> > --- > CC: John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > --- > content/testing/_index.md | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/content/testing/_index.md b/content/testing/_index.md > index fcdc47feca9a..3e430f8640af 100644 > --- a/content/testing/_index.md > +++ b/content/testing/_index.md > @@ -116,6 +116,10 @@ some validation reports are requested to the community members. > > Such release validations are sent as replies to the release announcement. > > +It is not easy (or not possible at all) to test PMDs other than device vendors, I'm not a native speaker, but is "for" missing (to do X is easy for Y)? Suggestion: for anyone other than device vendors. > +that is why it is expected vendors send a release validation report at least in > +the first release that the PMD is upstreamed. > + > > ## Tools > ---
On 6/24/2021 4:30 PM, Dmitry Kozlyuk wrote: > 2021-06-24 15:45 (UTC+0100), Ferruh Yigit: >> As discussed in the technical board meeting >> https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2021-February/200012.html >> >> This is to record that new upstreamed devices tested adequately. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> >> --- >> CC: John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com> >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org >> --- >> content/testing/_index.md | 4 ++++ >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/content/testing/_index.md b/content/testing/_index.md >> index fcdc47feca9a..3e430f8640af 100644 >> --- a/content/testing/_index.md >> +++ b/content/testing/_index.md >> @@ -116,6 +116,10 @@ some validation reports are requested to the community members. >> >> Such release validations are sent as replies to the release announcement. >> >> +It is not easy (or not possible at all) to test PMDs other than device vendors, > > I'm not a native speaker, but is "for" missing (to do X is easy for Y)? > Suggestion: for anyone other than device vendors. > Thanks Dmitry, I consulted to John for it, I am sending a new version soon. >> +that is why it is expected vendors send a release validation report at least in >> +the first release that the PMD is upstreamed. >> + >> >> ## Tools >> --- >
As discussed in the technical board meeting https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2021-February/200012.html This is to record that new upstreamed devices tested adequately. Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> --- CC: John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com> Cc: dev@dpdk.org Cc: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com> v2: * Paragraph reworded. --- content/testing/_index.md | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/content/testing/_index.md b/content/testing/_index.md index fcdc47feca9a..7504df0f7cae 100644 --- a/content/testing/_index.md +++ b/content/testing/_index.md @@ -116,6 +116,10 @@ some validation reports are requested to the community members. Such release validations are sent as replies to the release announcement. +Some PMDs can be tested only by their owners. That is why it is expected that +device vendors send a release validation report, at least in the first release +that the PMD is upstreamed. + ## Tools --- -- 2.31.1
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2021 9:35 AM
> To: web@dpdk.org
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; Mcnamara, John
> <john.mcnamara@intel.com>; Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v2] add testing requirement for new PMDs
>
> As discussed in the technical board meeting
> https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2021-February/200012.html
>
> This is to record that new upstreamed devices tested adequately.
Acked-by: John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
On 7/1/21 9:49 AM, Mcnamara, John wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2021 9:35 AM
>> To: web@dpdk.org
>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>; Mcnamara, John
>> <john.mcnamara@intel.com>; Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH v2] add testing requirement for new PMDs
>>
>> As discussed in the technical board meeting
>> https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2021-February/200012.html
>>
>> This is to record that new upstreamed devices tested adequately.
>
> Acked-by: John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
>
Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
04/07/2021 17:47, Andrew Rybchenko:
> On 7/1/21 9:49 AM, Mcnamara, John wrote:
> > From: Yigit, Ferruh <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> >> As discussed in the technical board meeting
> >> https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2021-February/200012.html
> >>
> >> This is to record that new upstreamed devices tested adequately.
> >
> > Acked-by: John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
>
> Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Applied, thanks