DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shun Hao <shunh@nvidia.com>
To: <orika@nvidia.com>, <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>, <matan@nvidia.com>,
	<shahafs@nvidia.com>, Li Zhang <lizh@nvidia.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, <thomas@monjalon.net>, <rasland@nvidia.com>,
	<roniba@nvidia.com>, <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 4/4] net/mlx5: fix meter policy flow match item
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 12:14:46 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210702091446.24635-5-shunh@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210702091446.24635-1-shunh@nvidia.com>

Currently when creating meter policy, a src port_id match item will
always be added in switch domain. So if one meter is used by another
port, it will not work correctly.

This issue is solved:
1. If policy fate action is port_id, add the src port_id match item,
and the meter cannot be shared by another port.
2. If policy fate action isn't port_id, don't add the src port_id
match, meter can be shared by another port.

This fix enables one meter being shared by different ports. User can
create a meter flow using a port_id match item to make this meter
shared by other port.

Fixes: afb4aa4f122 ("net/mlx5: support meter policy operations")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Shun Hao <shunh@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>
---
 doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst        |  8 +++++
 drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.h         |  2 ++
 drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst b/doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst
index eb44a070b1..57e7d17b87 100644
--- a/doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst
@@ -1912,3 +1912,11 @@ all flows with assistance of external tools.
    .. code-block:: console
 
        mlx_steering_dump.py -f <output_file> -flowptr <flow_ptr>
+
+How to share a meter between ports in the same switch domain
+------------------------------------------------------------
+
+This section demonstrates how to use the shared meter. A meter M can be created
+on port X and to be shared with a port Y on the same switch domain by the next way:
+
+        flow create X ingress transfer pattern eth / port_id id is Y / end actions meter mtr_id M / end
diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.h b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.h
index 6eae7b6fd7..0f4b239142 100644
--- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.h
+++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.h
@@ -682,6 +682,8 @@ struct mlx5_meter_policy_action_container {
 
 /* Flow meter policy parameter structure. */
 struct mlx5_flow_meter_policy {
+	struct rte_eth_dev *dev;
+	/* The port dev on which policy is created. */
 	uint32_t is_rss:1;
 	/* Is RSS policy table. */
 	uint32_t ingress:1;
diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
index a04a3c2bb8..75ef6216ac 100644
--- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
+++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
@@ -5031,6 +5031,8 @@ flow_dv_modify_hdr_action_max(struct rte_eth_dev *dev __rte_unused,
  *   Pointer to the meter action.
  * @param[in] attr
  *   Attributes of flow that includes this action.
+ * @param[in] port_id_item
+ *   Pointer to item indicating port id.
  * @param[out] error
  *   Pointer to error structure.
  *
@@ -5042,6 +5044,7 @@ mlx5_flow_validate_action_meter(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
 				uint64_t action_flags,
 				const struct rte_flow_action *action,
 				const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
+				const struct rte_flow_item *port_id_item,
 				bool *def_policy,
 				struct rte_flow_error *error)
 {
@@ -5112,6 +5115,37 @@ mlx5_flow_validate_action_meter(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
 					  "Flow attributes domain "
 					  "have a conflict with current "
 					  "meter domain attributes");
+		if (attr->transfer && mtr_policy->dev) {
+			/**
+			 * When policy has fate action of port_id,
+			 * the flow should have the same src port as policy.
+			 */
+			struct mlx5_priv *policy_port_priv =
+					mtr_policy->dev->data->dev_private;
+			int32_t flow_src_port = priv->representor_id;
+
+			if (port_id_item) {
+				const struct rte_flow_item_port_id *spec =
+							port_id_item->spec;
+				struct mlx5_priv *port_priv =
+					mlx5_port_to_eswitch_info(spec->id,
+								  false);
+				if (!port_priv)
+					return rte_flow_error_set(error,
+						rte_errno,
+						RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM_SPEC,
+						spec,
+						"Failed to get port info.");
+				flow_src_port = port_priv->representor_id;
+			}
+			if (flow_src_port != policy_port_priv->representor_id)
+				return rte_flow_error_set(error,
+						rte_errno,
+						RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM_SPEC,
+						NULL,
+						"Flow and meter policy "
+						"have different src port.");
+		}
 		*def_policy = false;
 	}
 	return 0;
@@ -6685,6 +6719,7 @@ flow_dv_validate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
 	};
 	const struct rte_eth_hairpin_conf *conf;
 	const struct rte_flow_item *rule_items = items;
+	const struct rte_flow_item *port_id_item = NULL;
 	bool def_policy = false;
 
 	if (items == NULL)
@@ -6726,6 +6761,7 @@ flow_dv_validate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
 			if (ret < 0)
 				return ret;
 			last_item = MLX5_FLOW_ITEM_PORT_ID;
+			port_id_item = items;
 			break;
 		case RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_ETH:
 			ret = mlx5_flow_validate_item_eth(items, item_flags,
@@ -7463,6 +7499,7 @@ flow_dv_validate(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
 			ret = mlx5_flow_validate_action_meter(dev,
 							      action_flags,
 							      actions, attr,
+							      port_id_item,
 							      &def_policy,
 							      error);
 			if (ret < 0)
@@ -15348,7 +15385,7 @@ __flow_dv_create_policy_flow(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
 			uint32_t color_reg_c_idx,
 			enum rte_color color, void *matcher_object,
 			int actions_n, void *actions,
-			bool is_default_policy, void **rule,
+			bool match_src_port, void **rule,
 			const struct rte_flow_attr *attr)
 {
 	int ret;
@@ -15362,7 +15399,7 @@ __flow_dv_create_policy_flow(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
 	};
 	struct mlx5_priv *priv = dev->data->dev_private;
 
-	if (!is_default_policy && (priv->representor || priv->master)) {
+	if (match_src_port && (priv->representor || priv->master)) {
 		if (flow_dv_translate_item_port_id(dev, matcher.buf,
 						   value.buf, NULL, attr)) {
 			DRV_LOG(ERR,
@@ -15389,7 +15426,7 @@ __flow_dv_create_policy_matcher(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
 			uint16_t priority,
 			struct mlx5_flow_meter_sub_policy *sub_policy,
 			const struct rte_flow_attr *attr,
-			bool is_default_policy,
+			bool match_src_port,
 			struct rte_flow_error *error)
 {
 	struct mlx5_cache_entry *entry;
@@ -15413,7 +15450,7 @@ __flow_dv_create_policy_matcher(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
 	struct mlx5_priv *priv = dev->data->dev_private;
 	uint32_t color_mask = (UINT32_C(1) << MLX5_MTR_COLOR_BITS) - 1;
 
-	if (!is_default_policy && (priv->representor || priv->master)) {
+	if (match_src_port && (priv->representor || priv->master)) {
 		if (flow_dv_translate_item_port_id(dev, matcher.mask.buf,
 						   value.buf, NULL, attr)) {
 			DRV_LOG(ERR,
@@ -15458,7 +15495,7 @@ __flow_dv_create_policy_matcher(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
 static int
 __flow_dv_create_domain_policy_rules(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
 		struct mlx5_flow_meter_sub_policy *sub_policy,
-		uint8_t egress, uint8_t transfer, bool is_default_policy,
+		uint8_t egress, uint8_t transfer, bool match_src_port,
 		struct mlx5_meter_policy_acts acts[RTE_COLORS])
 {
 	struct rte_flow_error flow_err;
@@ -15497,7 +15534,7 @@ __flow_dv_create_domain_policy_rules(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
 			/* Create matchers for Color. */
 			if (__flow_dv_create_policy_matcher(dev,
 				color_reg_c_idx, i, sub_policy,
-				&attr, is_default_policy, &flow_err))
+				&attr, match_src_port, &flow_err))
 				return -1;
 		}
 		/* Create flow, matching color. */
@@ -15507,7 +15544,7 @@ __flow_dv_create_domain_policy_rules(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
 				sub_policy->color_matcher[i]->matcher_object,
 				acts[i].actions_n,
 				acts[i].dv_actions,
-				is_default_policy,
+				match_src_port,
 				&sub_policy->color_rule[i],
 				&attr))
 				return -1;
@@ -15527,6 +15564,7 @@ __flow_dv_create_policy_acts_rules(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
 	struct mlx5_flow_dv_port_id_action_resource *port_action;
 	struct mlx5_hrxq *hrxq;
 	uint8_t egress, transfer;
+	bool match_src_port = false;
 	int i;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < RTE_COLORS; i++) {
@@ -15571,6 +15609,8 @@ __flow_dv_create_policy_acts_rules(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
 				acts[i].dv_actions[acts[i].actions_n] =
 				port_action->action;
 				acts[i].actions_n++;
+				mtr_policy->dev = dev;
+				match_src_port = true;
 				break;
 			case MLX5_FLOW_FATE_DROP:
 			case MLX5_FLOW_FATE_JUMP:
@@ -15601,7 +15641,7 @@ __flow_dv_create_policy_acts_rules(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
 	egress = (domain == MLX5_MTR_DOMAIN_EGRESS) ? 1 : 0;
 	transfer = (domain == MLX5_MTR_DOMAIN_TRANSFER) ? 1 : 0;
 	if (__flow_dv_create_domain_policy_rules(dev, sub_policy,
-				egress, transfer, false, acts)) {
+				egress, transfer, match_src_port, acts)) {
 		DRV_LOG(ERR,
 		"Failed to create policy rules per domain.");
 		return -1;
@@ -15709,7 +15749,7 @@ __flow_dv_create_domain_def_policy(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint32_t domain)
 		/* Create default policy rules. */
 		ret = __flow_dv_create_domain_policy_rules(dev,
 					&def_policy->sub_policy,
-					egress, transfer, true, acts);
+					egress, transfer, false, acts);
 		if (ret) {
 			DRV_LOG(ERR, "Failed to create "
 				"default policy rules.");
-- 
2.20.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-02  9:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-02  9:14 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/4] ASO meter sharing support Shun Hao
2021-07-02  9:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/4] net/mlx5: use meter profile lookup table Shun Hao
2021-07-02  9:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/4] net/mlx5: fix meter policy ID table container Shun Hao
2021-07-02  9:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 3/4] net/mlx5: fix meter flow direction check Shun Hao
2021-07-02  9:14 ` Shun Hao [this message]
2021-07-06  7:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/4] ASO meter sharing support Raslan Darawsheh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210702091446.24635-5-shunh@nvidia.com \
    --to=shunh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=lizh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=matan@nvidia.com \
    --cc=orika@nvidia.com \
    --cc=rasland@nvidia.com \
    --cc=roniba@nvidia.com \
    --cc=shahafs@nvidia.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).