From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44EBCA0C49; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 20:46:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1E4C413DB; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 20:46:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from linux.microsoft.com (linux.microsoft.com [13.77.154.182]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32773413B6; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 20:46:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1086) id 7433D20B7188; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 11:46:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com 7433D20B7188 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1625683572; bh=z4aSaYRmvpyxkoq+2f3FY1phziZpZccm/PDn7hTvZ/Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=gz+33cNzCXQpVSNdCc6ncAYDzJGLCmbRHTCUU4MjD/S7cBiunvfDf9mHTAdtsRJe5 vx61v5iH2VgS78C2ulRgtZx5OzMvOHghTCvw5xh16+uqsREnsCJJJI2kbQ6Te/vFk9 U4TSgzepytQ+wjahzQNbFCeVKz6EhLAd06+WZ3hM= Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2021 11:46:12 -0700 From: Tyler Retzlaff To: Morten =?iso-8859-1?Q?Br=F8rup?= Cc: dpdk-techboard , dpdk-dev Message-ID: <20210707184612.GB21313@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net> References: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35C618D2@smartserver.smartshare.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35C618D2@smartserver.smartshare.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] ABI/API stability towards drivers X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 10:00:11AM +0200, Morten Brørup wrote: > Regarding the ongoing ABI stability project, it is suggested to export driver interfaces as internal. > > What are we targeting regarding ABI and API stability towards drivers? last discussed the outcome was that there was no promise of api/abi stability at all for drivers only applications. tech-board may have discussed it further i don't know. we (Microsoft) would like to see them evolve to stable abi/api but we understand the challenges and effort involved. so driver stability is pretty much the interface consumers problem right now for drivers built in-tree and out of tree.