DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Eli Britstein <elibr@nvidia.com>,
	Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>,
	Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>,
	Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>,
	Ivan Malov <ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru>,
	Viacheslav Galaktionov <viacheslav.galaktionov@oktetlabs.ru>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: announce flow API action PORT_ID changes
Date: Sun,  1 Aug 2021 13:22:13 +0300
Message-ID: <20210801102214.1566104-1-andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru> (raw)

By its very name, action PORT_ID means that packets hit an ethdev with the
given DPDK port ID. At least the current comments don't state the opposite.
That said, since port representors had been adopted, applications like OvS
have been misusing the action. They misread its purpose as sending packets
to the opposite end of the "wire" plugged to the given ethdev, for example,
redirecting packets to the VF itself rather than to its representor ethdev.
Another example: OvS relies on this action with the admin PF's ethdev port
ID specified in it in order to send offloaded packets to the physical port.

Since there might be applications which use this action in its valid sense,
one can't just change the documentation to greenlight the opposite meaning.

The documentation must be clarified and rte_flow_action_port_id structure
should be extended to support both meanings.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
 doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
index d9c0e65921..6e6413c89f 100644
--- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
@@ -158,3 +158,8 @@ Deprecation Notices
 * security: The functions ``rte_security_set_pkt_metadata`` and
   ``rte_security_get_userdata`` will be made inline functions and additional
   flags will be added in structure ``rte_security_ctx`` in DPDK 21.11.
+* ethdev: Definition of the flow API action PORT_ID is ambiguous and needs
+  clarification. Structure rte_flow_action_port_id will be extended to
+  specify traffic direction to represented entity or ethdev port itself in
+  DPDK 21.11.

             reply	other threads:[~2021-08-01 10:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-01 10:22 Andrew Rybchenko [this message]
2021-08-01 10:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] ethdev: announce clarification of implicit filter by port Andrew Rybchenko
2021-08-02 10:37   ` Ori Kam
2021-08-01 10:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: announce flow API action PORT_ID changes Eli Britstein
2021-08-01 12:03   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-08-01 12:23     ` Ori Kam
2021-08-01 12:43       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-08-01 12:56         ` Ori Kam
2021-08-01 13:23           ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-08-01 16:13             ` Ori Kam
2021-08-01 20:09               ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-08-02  7:28                 ` Ori Kam
2021-08-02 10:11                   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-08-02  8:56                 ` Ori Kam
2021-08-02 15:49 ` Ilya Maximets
2021-08-02 19:19   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-08-02 19:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Andrew Rybchenko
2021-08-02 19:53   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] ethdev: announce clarification of implicit filter by port Andrew Rybchenko
2021-08-02 19:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] ethdev: announce flow API action PORT_ID changes Andrew Rybchenko
2021-08-02 19:57   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] ethdev: announce clarification of implicit filter by port Andrew Rybchenko
2021-08-02 21:17     ` Ajit Khaparde
2021-08-07 21:10       ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-08-02 21:20   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] ethdev: announce flow API action PORT_ID changes Ajit Khaparde
2021-08-07 21:06     ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210801102214.1566104-1-andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --to=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=elibr@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=i.maximets@ovn.org \
    --cc=ivan.malov@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=matan@nvidia.com \
    --cc=orika@nvidia.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=viacheslav.galaktionov@oktetlabs.ru \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
	public-inbox-index dev

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:

AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git