DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com>
To: thomas@monjalon.net, david.marchand@redhat.com,
	honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com, ruifeng.wang@arm.com,
	konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, rsanford@akamai.com,
	erik.g.carrillo@intel.com, olivier.matz@6wind.com,
	yipeng1.wang@intel.com, sameh.gobriel@intel.com,
	bruce.richardson@intel.com, vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com,
	anatoly.burakov@intel.com, andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru,
	jerinj@marvell.com, declan.doherty@intel.com,
	ciara.power@intel.com, xiaoyun.li@intel.com,
	nicolas.chautru@intel.com, maryam.tahhan@intel.com,
	reshma.pattan@intel.com, cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, nd@arm.com
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 07/12] app/eventdev: use compiler atomic builtins for packets sync
Date: Mon,  2 Aug 2021 05:18:42 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210802101847.3462-8-joyce.kong@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210802101847.3462-1-joyce.kong@arm.com>

Convert rte_atomic usages to compiler atomic built-ins
for outstanding_pkts sync in eventdev cases.

Signed-off-by: Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
---
 app/test-eventdev/evt_main.c          | 1 -
 app/test-eventdev/test_order_atq.c    | 4 ++--
 app/test-eventdev/test_order_common.c | 4 ++--
 app/test-eventdev/test_order_common.h | 8 ++++----
 app/test-eventdev/test_order_queue.c  | 4 ++--
 5 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test-eventdev/evt_main.c b/app/test-eventdev/evt_main.c
index a8d304bab3..01434691e1 100644
--- a/app/test-eventdev/evt_main.c
+++ b/app/test-eventdev/evt_main.c
@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@
 #include <unistd.h>
 #include <signal.h>
 
-#include <rte_atomic.h>
 #include <rte_debug.h>
 #include <rte_eal.h>
 #include <rte_eventdev.h>
diff --git a/app/test-eventdev/test_order_atq.c b/app/test-eventdev/test_order_atq.c
index 71215a07b6..2fee4b4daa 100644
--- a/app/test-eventdev/test_order_atq.c
+++ b/app/test-eventdev/test_order_atq.c
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ order_atq_worker(void *arg, const bool flow_id_cap)
 		uint16_t event = rte_event_dequeue_burst(dev_id, port,
 					&ev, 1, 0);
 		if (!event) {
-			if (rte_atomic64_read(outstand_pkts) <= 0)
+			if (__atomic_load_n(outstand_pkts, __ATOMIC_RELAXED) <= 0)
 				break;
 			rte_pause();
 			continue;
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ order_atq_worker_burst(void *arg, const bool flow_id_cap)
 				BURST_SIZE, 0);
 
 		if (nb_rx == 0) {
-			if (rte_atomic64_read(outstand_pkts) <= 0)
+			if (__atomic_load_n(outstand_pkts, __ATOMIC_RELAXED) <= 0)
 				break;
 			rte_pause();
 			continue;
diff --git a/app/test-eventdev/test_order_common.c b/app/test-eventdev/test_order_common.c
index d7760061ba..ff7813f9c2 100644
--- a/app/test-eventdev/test_order_common.c
+++ b/app/test-eventdev/test_order_common.c
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ order_test_setup(struct evt_test *test, struct evt_options *opt)
 		evt_err("failed to allocate t->expected_flow_seq memory");
 		goto exp_nomem;
 	}
-	rte_atomic64_set(&t->outstand_pkts, opt->nb_pkts);
+	__atomic_store_n(&t->outstand_pkts, opt->nb_pkts, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
 	t->err = false;
 	t->nb_pkts = opt->nb_pkts;
 	t->nb_flows = opt->nb_flows;
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ order_launch_lcores(struct evt_test *test, struct evt_options *opt,
 
 	while (t->err == false) {
 		uint64_t new_cycles = rte_get_timer_cycles();
-		int64_t remaining = rte_atomic64_read(&t->outstand_pkts);
+		int64_t remaining = __atomic_load_n(&t->outstand_pkts, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
 
 		if (remaining <= 0) {
 			t->result = EVT_TEST_SUCCESS;
diff --git a/app/test-eventdev/test_order_common.h b/app/test-eventdev/test_order_common.h
index cd9d6009ec..1507265928 100644
--- a/app/test-eventdev/test_order_common.h
+++ b/app/test-eventdev/test_order_common.h
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ struct test_order {
 	 * The atomic_* is an expensive operation,Since it is a functional test,
 	 * We are using the atomic_ operation to reduce the code complexity.
 	 */
-	rte_atomic64_t outstand_pkts;
+	uint64_t outstand_pkts;
 	enum evt_test_result result;
 	uint32_t nb_flows;
 	uint64_t nb_pkts;
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static __rte_always_inline void
 order_process_stage_1(struct test_order *const t,
 		struct rte_event *const ev, const uint32_t nb_flows,
 		uint32_t *const expected_flow_seq,
-		rte_atomic64_t *const outstand_pkts)
+		uint64_t *const outstand_pkts)
 {
 	const uint32_t flow = (uintptr_t)ev->mbuf % nb_flows;
 	/* compare the seqn against expected value */
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ order_process_stage_1(struct test_order *const t,
 	 */
 	expected_flow_seq[flow]++;
 	rte_pktmbuf_free(ev->mbuf);
-	rte_atomic64_sub(outstand_pkts, 1);
+	__atomic_fetch_sub(outstand_pkts, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
 }
 
 static __rte_always_inline void
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ order_process_stage_invalid(struct test_order *const t,
 	const uint8_t port = w->port_id;\
 	const uint32_t nb_flows = t->nb_flows;\
 	uint32_t *expected_flow_seq = t->expected_flow_seq;\
-	rte_atomic64_t *outstand_pkts = &t->outstand_pkts;\
+	uint64_t *outstand_pkts = &t->outstand_pkts;\
 	if (opt->verbose_level > 1)\
 		printf("%s(): lcore %d dev_id %d port=%d\n",\
 			__func__, rte_lcore_id(), dev_id, port)
diff --git a/app/test-eventdev/test_order_queue.c b/app/test-eventdev/test_order_queue.c
index 621367805a..80eaea5cf5 100644
--- a/app/test-eventdev/test_order_queue.c
+++ b/app/test-eventdev/test_order_queue.c
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ order_queue_worker(void *arg, const bool flow_id_cap)
 		uint16_t event = rte_event_dequeue_burst(dev_id, port,
 					&ev, 1, 0);
 		if (!event) {
-			if (rte_atomic64_read(outstand_pkts) <= 0)
+			if (__atomic_load_n(outstand_pkts, __ATOMIC_RELAXED) <= 0)
 				break;
 			rte_pause();
 			continue;
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ order_queue_worker_burst(void *arg, const bool flow_id_cap)
 				BURST_SIZE, 0);
 
 		if (nb_rx == 0) {
-			if (rte_atomic64_read(outstand_pkts) <= 0)
+			if (__atomic_load_n(outstand_pkts, __ATOMIC_RELAXED) <= 0)
 				break;
 			rte_pause();
 			continue;
-- 
2.17.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-08-02 10:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-02 10:18 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 00/12] use compiler atomic builtins for app Joyce Kong
2021-08-02 10:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 01/12] test/pmd_perf: use compiler atomic builtins for polling sync Joyce Kong
2021-11-08 22:50   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-11-10  6:10     ` Joyce Kong
2021-08-02 10:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 02/12] test/ring_perf: use compiler atomic builtins for lcores sync Joyce Kong
2021-11-09  5:43   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-08-02 10:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 03/12] test/timer: use compiler atomic builtins for sync Joyce Kong
2021-11-09 20:59   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-08-02 10:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 04/12] test/stack_perf: use compiler atomics for lcore sync Joyce Kong
2021-11-09 21:12   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-08-02 10:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 05/12] test/bpf: use compiler atomics for calculation Joyce Kong
2021-08-02 10:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 06/12] test/func_reentrancy: use compiler atomic for data sync Joyce Kong
2021-11-09 21:54   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-08-02 10:18 ` Joyce Kong [this message]
2021-11-10 23:19   ` [PATCH v1 07/12] app/eventdev: use compiler atomic builtins for packets sync Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-11-11  7:27     ` Joyce Kong
2021-08-02 10:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 08/12] app/crypto: use compiler atomic builtins for display sync Joyce Kong
2021-11-09 22:11   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-08-02 10:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 09/12] app/compress: " Joyce Kong
2021-11-09 22:59   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-11-11  8:13     ` Joyce Kong
2021-08-02 10:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 10/12] app/testpmd: use compiler atomic builtins for port sync Joyce Kong
2021-11-09 23:14   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-11-11  8:51     ` Joyce Kong
2021-08-02 10:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 11/12] app/bbdev: use compiler atomics for thread sync Joyce Kong
2021-11-10 21:25   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-08-02 10:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 12/12] app: remove unnecessary include of atomic Joyce Kong
2021-10-21  6:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 00/12] use compiler atomic builtins for app Joyce Kong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210802101847.3462-8-joyce.kong@arm.com \
    --to=joyce.kong@arm.com \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=ciara.power@intel.com \
    --cc=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=erik.g.carrillo@intel.com \
    --cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=maryam.tahhan@intel.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=nicolas.chautru@intel.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=reshma.pattan@intel.com \
    --cc=rsanford@akamai.com \
    --cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
    --cc=sameh.gobriel@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com \
    --cc=xiaoyun.li@intel.com \
    --cc=yipeng1.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).