[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] bpf: fix spelling in comments

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] bpf: fix spelling in comments

[Stephen Hemminger]

Found by running codespell on the bpf implementation.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---
 lib/bpf/bpf_jit_x86.c  | 2 +-
 lib/bpf/bpf_validate.c | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/bpf/bpf_jit_x86.c b/lib/bpf/bpf_jit_x86.c
index aa22ea78a01d..518513376a67 100644
--- a/lib/bpf/bpf_jit_x86.c
+++ b/lib/bpf/bpf_jit_x86.c
@@ -1245,7 +1245,7 @@ emit_epilog(struct bpf_jit_state *st)
 	uint32_t i;
 	int32_t spil, ofs;
 
-	/* if we allready have an epilog generate a jump to it */
+	/* if we already have an epilog generate a jump to it */
 	if (st->exit.num++ != 0) {
 		emit_abs_jmp(st, st->exit.off);
 		return;
diff --git a/lib/bpf/bpf_validate.c b/lib/bpf/bpf_validate.c
index 7b1291b382e9..3e7d3d730637 100644
--- a/lib/bpf/bpf_validate.c
+++ b/lib/bpf/bpf_validate.c
@@ -1723,7 +1723,7 @@ static const struct bpf_ins_check ins_chk[UINT8_MAX + 1] = {
 
 /*
  * make sure that instruction syntax is valid,
- * and it fields don't violate partciular instrcution type restrictions.
+ * and it fields don't violate particular instruction type restrictions.
  */
 static const char *
 check_syntax(const struct ebpf_insn *ins)
@@ -1981,7 +1981,7 @@ validate(struct bpf_verifier *bvf)
 
 		/*
 		 * construct CFG, jcc nodes have to outgoing edges,
-		 * 'exit' nodes - none, all others nodes have exaclty one
+		 * 'exit' nodes - none, all others nodes have exactly one
 		 * outgoing edge.
 		 */
 		switch (ins->code) {
-- 
2.30.2