DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org, honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com,
	konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, david.marchand@redhat.com,
	feifei.wang2@arm.com
Cc: ruifeng.wang@arm.com, nd@arm.com, Feifei Wang <feifei.wang@arm.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/6] eal: update rte_eal_wait_lcore definition
Date: Thu,  9 Sep 2021 18:13:10 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210909231312.2572006-5-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210909231312.2572006-1-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>

Since the FINISHED state is removed, the API rte_eal_wait_lcore
is updated to always return the status of the last function that
ran in the worker core.

Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Feifei Wang <feifei.wang@arm.com>
---
 lib/eal/common/eal_common_launch.c |  6 ++----
 lib/eal/include/rte_launch.h       | 12 +++++-------
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/eal/common/eal_common_launch.c b/lib/eal/common/eal_common_launch.c
index 78fd940267..4bc842417a 100644
--- a/lib/eal/common/eal_common_launch.c
+++ b/lib/eal/common/eal_common_launch.c
@@ -23,10 +23,8 @@
 int
 rte_eal_wait_lcore(unsigned worker_id)
 {
-	if (lcore_config[worker_id].state == WAIT)
-		return 0;
-
-	while (lcore_config[worker_id].state != WAIT)
+	while (__atomic_load_n(&lcore_config[worker_id].state,
+					__ATOMIC_ACQUIRE) != WAIT)
 		rte_pause();
 
 	rte_rmb();
diff --git a/lib/eal/include/rte_launch.h b/lib/eal/include/rte_launch.h
index ed0bb4762a..f2d386e6e2 100644
--- a/lib/eal/include/rte_launch.h
+++ b/lib/eal/include/rte_launch.h
@@ -119,18 +119,16 @@ enum rte_lcore_state_t rte_eal_get_lcore_state(unsigned int worker_id);
  *
  * To be executed on the MAIN lcore only.
  *
- * If the worker lcore identified by the worker_id is in a FINISHED state,
- * switch to the WAIT state. If the lcore is in RUNNING state, wait until
- * the lcore finishes its job and moves to the FINISHED state.
+ * If the lcore identified by the worker_id is in RUNNING state, wait until
+ * the lcore finishes its job and moves to the WAIT state.
  *
  * @param worker_id
  *   The identifier of the lcore.
  * @return
- *   - 0: If the lcore identified by the worker_id is in a WAIT state.
+ *   - 0: If the remote launch function was never called on the lcore
+ *     identified by the worker_id.
  *   - The value that was returned by the previous remote launch
- *     function call if the lcore identified by the worker_id was in a
- *     FINISHED or RUNNING state. In this case, it changes the state
- *     of the lcore to WAIT.
+ *     function call.
  */
 int rte_eal_wait_lcore(unsigned worker_id);
 
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-09-09 23:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-24 21:20 [dpdk-dev] [RFC 0/5] Use correct memory ordering in eal functions Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-02-24 21:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 1/5] eal: reset lcore function pointer and argument Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-02-24 21:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 2/5] eal: ensure memory operations are visible to worker Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-02-24 21:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 3/5] eal: lcore state FINISHED is not required Honnappa Nagarahalli
     [not found]   ` <AM5PR0802MB2465B62994239817E0AC46C59E9E9@AM5PR0802MB2465.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
2021-02-25  8:44     ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2021-02-25 23:33       ` [dpdk-dev] " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-02-26  8:26         ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-02  3:13           ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-03-19 13:42             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-03-30  2:54               ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-03-01  5:55         ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2021-02-24 21:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 4/5] eal: ensure memory operations are visible to main Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-02-24 21:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 5/5] test/ring: use relaxed barriers for ring stress test Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-03-01 16:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 0/5] Use correct memory ordering in eal functions Stephen Hemminger
2021-03-02 16:06   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-09-09 23:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/6] " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-09-09 23:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/6] eal: reset lcore function pointer and argument Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-09-10  7:49     ` Bruce Richardson
2021-09-10  8:12       ` David Marchand
2021-09-11 22:19         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-09-09 23:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/6] eal: ensure memory operations are visible to worker Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-09-09 23:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/6] eal: lcore state FINISHED is not required Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-09-09 23:13   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli [this message]
2021-09-09 23:37     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/6] eal: update rte_eal_wait_lcore definition Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-09-09 23:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/6] eal: ensure memory operations are visible to main Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-09-09 23:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/6] test/ring: use relaxed barriers for ring stress test Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-10-07 11:55     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-10-07 23:40       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-10-25  4:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] Use correct memory ordering in eal functions Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-10-25  4:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] eal: reset lcore function pointer and argument Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-10-25  4:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] eal: lcore state FINISHED is not required Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-10-25  4:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] eal: use correct memory ordering Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-10-25  4:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] test/ring: use relaxed barriers for ring stress test Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-10-25 16:23   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] Use correct memory ordering in eal functions David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210909231312.2572006-5-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --to=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=feifei.wang2@arm.com \
    --cc=feifei.wang@arm.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).