From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73CCDA0548;
Fri, 12 Nov 2021 01:03:10 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5DCE41170;
Fri, 12 Nov 2021 01:02:41 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-pl1-f177.google.com (mail-pl1-f177.google.com
[209.85.214.177])
by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C103E41154
for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 01:02:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-pl1-f177.google.com with SMTP id k4so6999411plx.8
for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 16:02:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=networkplumber-org.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112;
h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references
:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=iln2nv8pXe/Ypesvsv95wbauxxeNgZPNh6cTHcC8+g0=;
b=IunTt389Ui8eOD7Lksp9s3GlpBo0HpGpqQmYizkN0pnQRT6g1fl3ExtL8i40rCnd6J
7omJO041AZRofL9IvNHql1n3/OFNk4D7uGaldBfTqykVJ1KmqZ67dQwFrsUQ6K2ShcA6
dfeEaLUG1/vny+uBjuaL3SoFPZ5kkl6Xp10UBJffmDNvFaT+jeuABLvu7icyCiT13pNh
rQsa0hH04h3DkXkipcDWCP4KdhIoJTEsV0gY01lSJRi46ENgYFSXMiNmPM6zBUH5S3e/
wrsN+T+NnsYE7v/5YePT4lOCcwDbSbwTlnez2wfEz6ie4e5uIArSSWvle2pWXAlPsvAs
r/fA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to
:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=iln2nv8pXe/Ypesvsv95wbauxxeNgZPNh6cTHcC8+g0=;
b=JJHMTEnv1LYqxrU3SHCwZFDllgzEulkv3sR5YtGbkzoZQgXbMawUYOiDDW69IfplLR
3/GBb69mDhZMpuCiaGq8B4HKghrDBfgHHSNjw0sO9dlop77MPfJQfoq0O2hJFPtlQrI1
GjCk+9KkXw2lLwl6u4LH7FD7/zyp04WDU0hfJdUO5LpcZkbCNfDOTIvsLtnJZDANw3pc
bB2W7id5iuOQge0ZMS2IBkcH416weYjJAYUTcnecu8V4L3W7ROFHWmVoaclPrNUS+xQO
Tr7AO6MfFCQ+cMKMXXMR1W6N9b77DQQ5IkVlYsqYO1QvEzmY1WA/0bog3rTcV/6KIesa
ysZA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5339SawyksDzooDgsPhHtD7v4zeZviD/oXOeEYyFClsRw8qiIDMU
docRz1QzoZF6dptsJELfh6hwhTpZ4Ip6Hg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz8TAaq1tnwVNyooogaYUyjIATpZmKXe7zfH1vaGDNBZyqqhhOZAYVdKENWlJYhYzOWuC5HZw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:b786:: with SMTP id
m6mr30926773pjr.30.1636675356621;
Thu, 11 Nov 2021 16:02:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hermes.local (204-195-33-123.wavecable.com. [204.195.33.123])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ls14sm9567296pjb.49.2021.11.11.16.02.35
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
Thu, 11 Nov 2021 16:02:36 -0800 (PST)
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 06/18] bpf: fix spelling in comments
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 16:02:14 -0800
Message-Id: <20211112000226.56586-7-stephen@networkplumber.org>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2
In-Reply-To: <20211112000226.56586-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
References: <20210909175648.174258-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
<20211112000226.56586-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
<mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
<mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Found by running codespell on the bpf implementation.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
---
lib/bpf/bpf_jit_x86.c | 2 +-
lib/bpf/bpf_load_elf.c | 2 +-
lib/bpf/bpf_pkt.c | 2 +-
lib/bpf/bpf_validate.c | 8 ++++----
4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/bpf/bpf_jit_x86.c b/lib/bpf/bpf_jit_x86.c
index aa22ea78a01d..518513376a67 100644
--- a/lib/bpf/bpf_jit_x86.c
+++ b/lib/bpf/bpf_jit_x86.c
@@ -1245,7 +1245,7 @@ emit_epilog(struct bpf_jit_state *st)
uint32_t i;
int32_t spil, ofs;
- /* if we allready have an epilog generate a jump to it */
+ /* if we already have an epilog generate a jump to it */
if (st->exit.num++ != 0) {
emit_abs_jmp(st, st->exit.off);
return;
diff --git a/lib/bpf/bpf_load_elf.c b/lib/bpf/bpf_load_elf.c
index 2b11adeb5eb1..02a5d8ba0d07 100644
--- a/lib/bpf/bpf_load_elf.c
+++ b/lib/bpf/bpf_load_elf.c
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ resolve_xsym(const char *sn, size_t ofs, struct ebpf_insn *ins, size_t ins_sz,
if (type == RTE_BPF_XTYPE_FUNC) {
/* we don't support multiple functions per BPF module,
- * so treat EBPF_PSEUDO_CALL to extrernal function
+ * so treat EBPF_PSEUDO_CALL to external function
* as an ordinary EBPF_CALL.
*/
if (ins[idx].src_reg == EBPF_PSEUDO_CALL) {
diff --git a/lib/bpf/bpf_pkt.c b/lib/bpf/bpf_pkt.c
index 08eebd99b371..af422afc072a 100644
--- a/lib/bpf/bpf_pkt.c
+++ b/lib/bpf/bpf_pkt.c
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ bpf_eth_cbh_add(struct bpf_eth_cbh *cbh, uint16_t port, uint16_t queue)
}
/*
- * BPF packet processing routinies.
+ * BPF packet processing routines.
*/
static inline uint32_t
diff --git a/lib/bpf/bpf_validate.c b/lib/bpf/bpf_validate.c
index 853279fee557..09331258ebf6 100644
--- a/lib/bpf/bpf_validate.c
+++ b/lib/bpf/bpf_validate.c
@@ -1730,7 +1730,7 @@ static const struct bpf_ins_check ins_chk[UINT8_MAX + 1] = {
/*
* make sure that instruction syntax is valid,
- * and it fields don't violate partciular instrcution type restrictions.
+ * and its fields don't violate particular instruction type restrictions.
*/
static const char *
check_syntax(const struct ebpf_insn *ins)
@@ -1961,7 +1961,7 @@ log_loop(const struct bpf_verifier *bvf)
* First pass goes though all instructions in the set, checks that each
* instruction is a valid one (correct syntax, valid field values, etc.)
* and constructs control flow graph (CFG).
- * Then deapth-first search is performed over the constructed graph.
+ * Then depth-first search is performed over the constructed graph.
* Programs with unreachable instructions and/or loops will be rejected.
*/
static int
@@ -1988,7 +1988,7 @@ validate(struct bpf_verifier *bvf)
/*
* construct CFG, jcc nodes have to outgoing edges,
- * 'exit' nodes - none, all others nodes have exaclty one
+ * 'exit' nodes - none, all other nodes have exactly one
* outgoing edge.
*/
switch (ins->code) {
@@ -2258,7 +2258,7 @@ evaluate(struct bpf_verifier *bvf)
idx = get_node_idx(bvf, node);
op = ins[idx].code;
- /* for jcc node make a copy of evaluatoion state */
+ /* for jcc node make a copy of evaluation state */
if (node->nb_edge > 1)
rc |= save_eval_state(bvf, node);
--
2.30.2