DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] pipeline: fix annotation checks
@ 2021-12-03 14:31 Cristian Dumitrescu
  2022-02-13 20:06 ` Thomas Monjalon
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Cristian Dumitrescu @ 2021-12-03 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev; +Cc: stable, Yogesh Jangra

The checks for the table-only and default-only annotations were
incorrect, as they were using the pipeline action ID instead of the
table action ID for retrieving the table action info. These checks are
now corrected and pushed into the internal table_entry_check()
function.

Fixes: cd79e0205824 ("pipeline: support action annotations")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yogesh Jangra <yogesh.jangra@intel.com>
---
 lib/pipeline/rte_swx_ctl.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/pipeline/rte_swx_ctl.c b/lib/pipeline/rte_swx_ctl.c
index 1c908e3e3f..8e29d58cec 100644
--- a/lib/pipeline/rte_swx_ctl.c
+++ b/lib/pipeline/rte_swx_ctl.c
@@ -372,18 +372,34 @@ table_entry_check(struct rte_swx_ctl_pipeline *ctl,
 
 	if (data_check) {
 		struct action *a;
+		struct rte_swx_ctl_table_action_info *tai;
 		uint32_t i;
 
 		/* action_id. */
-		for (i = 0; i < table->info.n_actions; i++)
-			if (entry->action_id == table->actions[i].action_id)
+		for (i = 0; i < table->info.n_actions; i++) {
+			tai = &table->actions[i];
+
+			if (entry->action_id == tai->action_id)
 				break;
+		}
 
 		CHECK(i < table->info.n_actions, EINVAL);
 
 		/* action_data. */
 		a = &ctl->actions[entry->action_id];
 		CHECK(!(a->data_size && !entry->action_data), EINVAL);
+
+		/* When both key_check and data_check are true, we are interested in both the entry
+		 * key and data, which means the operation is _regular_ table entry add.
+		 */
+		if (key_check && !tai->action_is_for_table_entries)
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		/* When key_check is false while data_check is true, we are only interested in the
+		 * entry data, which means the operation is _default_ table entry add.
+		 */
+		if (!key_check && !tai->action_is_for_default_entry)
+			return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
 	return 0;
@@ -1446,8 +1462,6 @@ rte_swx_ctl_pipeline_table_entry_add(struct rte_swx_ctl_pipeline *ctl,
 	CHECK(entry, EINVAL);
 	CHECK(!table_entry_check(ctl, table_id, entry, 1, 1), EINVAL);
 
-	CHECK(table->actions[entry->action_id].action_is_for_table_entries, EINVAL);
-
 	new_entry = table_entry_duplicate(ctl, table_id, entry, 1, 1);
 	CHECK(new_entry, ENOMEM);
 
@@ -1653,8 +1667,6 @@ rte_swx_ctl_pipeline_table_default_entry_add(struct rte_swx_ctl_pipeline *ctl,
 	CHECK(entry, EINVAL);
 	CHECK(!table_entry_check(ctl, table_id, entry, 0, 1), EINVAL);
 
-	CHECK(table->actions[entry->action_id].action_is_for_default_entry, EINVAL);
-
 	new_entry = table_entry_duplicate(ctl, table_id, entry, 0, 1);
 	CHECK(new_entry, ENOMEM);
 
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-02-13 20:07 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-12-03 14:31 [PATCH] pipeline: fix annotation checks Cristian Dumitrescu
2022-02-13 20:06 ` Thomas Monjalon

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).