From: Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>
To: Beilei Xing <beilei.xing@intel.com>, Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, nd@arm.com, Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>,
Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v1 1/4] net/i40e: enable direct re-arm mode
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2021 00:46:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211224164613.32569-2-feifei.wang2@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211224164613.32569-1-feifei.wang2@arm.com>
For i40e driver, enable direct re-arm mode. This patch supports the
case of mapping Rx/Tx queues from the same single lcore.
Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
---
drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.h | 4 +
drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_neon.c | 149 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.h b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.h
index 5e6eecc501..1fdf4305f4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.h
+++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.h
@@ -102,6 +102,8 @@ struct i40e_rx_queue {
uint16_t rxrearm_nb; /**< number of remaining to be re-armed */
uint16_t rxrearm_start; /**< the idx we start the re-arming from */
+ uint16_t direct_rxrearm_port; /** device TX port ID for direct re-arm mode */
+ uint16_t direct_rxrearm_queue; /** TX queue index for direct re-arm mode */
uint64_t mbuf_initializer; /**< value to init mbufs */
uint16_t port_id; /**< device port ID */
@@ -121,6 +123,8 @@ struct i40e_rx_queue {
uint16_t rx_using_sse; /**<flag indicate the usage of vPMD for rx */
uint8_t dcb_tc; /**< Traffic class of rx queue */
uint64_t offloads; /**< Rx offload flags of RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_* */
+ /**< 0 if direct re-arm mode disabled, 1 when enabled */
+ bool direct_rxrearm_enable;
const struct rte_memzone *mz;
};
diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_neon.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_neon.c
index b951ea2dc3..72bac3fb40 100644
--- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_neon.c
+++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_neon.c
@@ -77,6 +77,147 @@ i40e_rxq_rearm(struct i40e_rx_queue *rxq)
I40E_PCI_REG_WRITE_RELAXED(rxq->qrx_tail, rx_id);
}
+static inline void
+i40e_rxq_rearm_direct_single(struct i40e_rx_queue *rxq)
+{
+ struct rte_eth_dev *dev;
+ struct i40e_tx_queue *txq;
+ volatile union i40e_rx_desc *rxdp;
+ struct i40e_tx_entry *txep;
+ struct i40e_rx_entry *rxep;
+ uint16_t tx_port_id, tx_queue_id;
+ uint16_t rx_id;
+ struct rte_mbuf *mb0, *mb1, *m;
+ uint64x2_t dma_addr0, dma_addr1;
+ uint64x2_t zero = vdupq_n_u64(0);
+ uint64_t paddr;
+ uint16_t i, n;
+ uint16_t nb_rearm = 0;
+
+ rxdp = rxq->rx_ring + rxq->rxrearm_start;
+ rxep = &rxq->sw_ring[rxq->rxrearm_start];
+
+ tx_port_id = rxq->direct_rxrearm_port;
+ tx_queue_id = rxq->direct_rxrearm_queue;
+ dev = &rte_eth_devices[tx_port_id];
+ txq = dev->data->tx_queues[tx_queue_id];
+
+ /* tx_rs_thresh must be equal to
+ * RTE_I40E_RXQ_REARM_THRESH in
+ * direct re-arm mode due to
+ * tx_next_dd update based on the
+ * number of free buffers in the
+ * next time
+ */
+ n = RTE_I40E_RXQ_REARM_THRESH;
+
+ if (txq->nb_tx_free < txq->tx_free_thresh) {
+ /* check DD bits on threshold descriptor */
+ if ((txq->tx_ring[txq->tx_next_dd].cmd_type_offset_bsz &
+ rte_cpu_to_le_64(I40E_TXD_QW1_DTYPE_MASK)) !=
+ rte_cpu_to_le_64(I40E_TX_DESC_DTYPE_DESC_DONE)) {
+ goto mempool_bulk;
+ }
+
+ /* first buffer to free from S/W ring is at index
+ * tx_next_dd - (tx_rs_thresh-1)
+ */
+ txep = &txq->sw_ring[txq->tx_next_dd - (n - 1)];
+
+ if (txq->offloads & DEV_TX_OFFLOAD_MBUF_FAST_FREE) {
+ /* directly put mbufs from Tx to Rx,
+ * and initialize the mbufs in vector,
+ * process 2 mbufs in one loop
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < n; i += 2, rxep += 2, txep += 2) {
+ rxep[0].mbuf = txep[0].mbuf;
+ rxep[1].mbuf = txep[1].mbuf;
+
+ /* Initialize rxdp descs */
+ mb0 = txep[0].mbuf;
+ mb1 = txep[1].mbuf;
+
+ paddr = mb0->buf_iova + RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM;
+ dma_addr0 = vdupq_n_u64(paddr);
+ /* flush desc with pa dma_addr */
+ vst1q_u64((uint64_t *)&rxdp++->read, dma_addr0);
+
+ paddr = mb1->buf_iova + RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM;
+ dma_addr1 = vdupq_n_u64(paddr);
+ /* flush desc with pa dma_addr */
+ vst1q_u64((uint64_t *)&rxdp++->read, dma_addr1);
+ }
+ } else {
+ for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
+ m = rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg(txep[i].mbuf);
+ if (m != NULL) {
+ rxep[i].mbuf = m;
+
+ /* Initialize rxdp descs */
+ paddr = m->buf_iova + RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM;
+ dma_addr0 = vdupq_n_u64(paddr);
+ /* flush desc with pa dma_addr */
+ vst1q_u64((uint64_t *)&rxdp++->read, dma_addr0);
+ nb_rearm++;
+ }
+ }
+ n = nb_rearm;
+ }
+
+ /* update counters for Tx */
+ txq->nb_tx_free = (uint16_t)(txq->nb_tx_free + RTE_I40E_RXQ_REARM_THRESH);
+ txq->tx_next_dd = (uint16_t)(txq->tx_next_dd + RTE_I40E_RXQ_REARM_THRESH);
+ if (txq->tx_next_dd >= txq->nb_tx_desc)
+ txq->tx_next_dd = (uint16_t)(RTE_I40E_RXQ_REARM_THRESH - 1);
+ } else {
+mempool_bulk:
+ /* if TX did not free bufs into Rx sw-ring,
+ * get new bufs from mempool
+ */
+ if (unlikely(rte_mempool_get_bulk(rxq->mp, (void *)rxep, n) < 0)) {
+ if (rxq->rxrearm_nb + n >= rxq->nb_rx_desc) {
+ for (i = 0; i < RTE_I40E_DESCS_PER_LOOP; i++) {
+ rxep[i].mbuf = &rxq->fake_mbuf;
+ vst1q_u64((uint64_t *)&rxdp[i].read, zero);
+ }
+ }
+ rte_eth_devices[rxq->port_id].data->rx_mbuf_alloc_failed += n;
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /* Initialize the mbufs in vector, process 2 mbufs in one loop */
+ for (i = 0; i < n; i += 2, rxep += 2) {
+ mb0 = rxep[0].mbuf;
+ mb1 = rxep[1].mbuf;
+
+ paddr = mb0->buf_iova + RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM;
+ dma_addr0 = vdupq_n_u64(paddr);
+ /* flush desc with pa dma_addr */
+ vst1q_u64((uint64_t *)&rxdp++->read, dma_addr0);
+
+ paddr = mb1->buf_iova + RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM;
+ dma_addr1 = vdupq_n_u64(paddr);
+ /* flush desc with pa dma_addr */
+ vst1q_u64((uint64_t *)&rxdp++->read, dma_addr1);
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Update the descriptor initializer index */
+ rxq->rxrearm_start += n;
+ rx_id = rxq->rxrearm_start - 1;
+
+ if (unlikely(rxq->rxrearm_start >= rxq->nb_rx_desc)) {
+ rxq->rxrearm_start = 0;
+ rx_id = rxq->nb_rx_desc - 1;
+ }
+
+ rxq->rxrearm_nb -= n;
+
+ rte_io_wmb();
+ /* Update the tail pointer on the NIC */
+ I40E_PCI_REG_WRITE_RELAXED(rxq->qrx_tail, rx_id);
+}
+
static inline void
desc_to_olflags_v(struct i40e_rx_queue *rxq, uint64x2_t descs[4],
struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts)
@@ -244,8 +385,12 @@ _recv_raw_pkts_vec(struct i40e_rx_queue *__rte_restrict rxq,
/* See if we need to rearm the RX queue - gives the prefetch a bit
* of time to act
*/
- if (rxq->rxrearm_nb > RTE_I40E_RXQ_REARM_THRESH)
- i40e_rxq_rearm(rxq);
+ if (rxq->rxrearm_nb > RTE_I40E_RXQ_REARM_THRESH) {
+ if (rxq->direct_rxrearm_enable)
+ i40e_rxq_rearm_direct_single(rxq);
+ else
+ i40e_rxq_rearm(rxq);
+ }
/* Before we start moving massive data around, check to see if
* there is actually a packet available
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-24 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-24 16:46 [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] Direct re-arming of buffers on receive side Feifei Wang
2021-12-24 16:46 ` Feifei Wang [this message]
2021-12-24 16:46 ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/4] ethdev: add API for direct re-arm mode Feifei Wang
2021-12-24 19:38 ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-12-26 9:49 ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2021-12-26 10:31 ` Morten Brørup
2021-12-24 16:46 ` [RFC PATCH v1 3/4] net/i40e: add direct re-arm mode internal API Feifei Wang
2021-12-24 16:46 ` [RFC PATCH v1 4/4] examples/l3fwd: give an example for direct rearm mode Feifei Wang
2021-12-26 10:25 ` [RFC PATCH v1 0/4] Direct re-arming of buffers on receive side Morten Brørup
2021-12-28 6:55 ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2022-01-18 15:51 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-01-18 16:53 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-01-18 17:27 ` Morten Brørup
2022-01-27 5:24 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-01-27 16:45 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2022-02-02 19:46 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-01-27 5:16 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2023-02-28 6:43 ` 回复: " Feifei Wang
2023-02-28 6:52 ` Feifei Wang
2022-01-27 4:06 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2022-01-27 17:13 ` Morten Brørup
2022-01-28 11:29 ` Morten Brørup
2023-03-23 10:43 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] Recycle buffers from Tx to Rx Feifei Wang
2023-03-23 10:43 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] ethdev: add API for buffer recycle mode Feifei Wang
2023-03-23 11:41 ` Morten Brørup
2023-03-29 2:16 ` Feifei Wang
2023-03-23 10:43 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] net/i40e: implement recycle buffer mode Feifei Wang
2023-03-23 10:43 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] net/ixgbe: " Feifei Wang
2023-03-30 6:29 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] Recycle buffers from Tx to Rx Feifei Wang
2023-03-30 6:29 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] ethdev: add API for buffer recycle mode Feifei Wang
2023-03-30 7:19 ` Morten Brørup
2023-03-30 9:31 ` Feifei Wang
2023-03-30 15:15 ` Morten Brørup
2023-03-30 15:58 ` Morten Brørup
2023-04-26 6:59 ` Feifei Wang
2023-04-19 14:46 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-04-26 7:29 ` Feifei Wang
2023-03-30 6:29 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] net/i40e: implement recycle buffer mode Feifei Wang
2023-03-30 6:29 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] net/ixgbe: " Feifei Wang
2023-04-19 14:46 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-04-26 7:36 ` Feifei Wang
2023-03-30 15:04 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] Recycle buffers from Tx to Rx Stephen Hemminger
2023-04-03 2:48 ` Feifei Wang
2023-04-19 14:56 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-04-25 7:57 ` Feifei Wang
2023-05-25 9:45 ` [PATCH v6 0/4] Recycle mbufs from Tx queue to Rx queue Feifei Wang
2023-05-25 9:45 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] ethdev: add API for mbufs recycle mode Feifei Wang
2023-05-25 15:08 ` Morten Brørup
2023-05-31 6:10 ` Feifei Wang
2023-06-05 12:53 ` Константин Ананьев
2023-06-06 2:55 ` Feifei Wang
2023-06-06 7:10 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-06-06 7:31 ` Feifei Wang
2023-06-06 8:34 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-06-07 0:00 ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-06-12 3:25 ` Feifei Wang
2023-05-25 9:45 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] net/i40e: implement " Feifei Wang
2023-06-05 13:02 ` Константин Ананьев
2023-06-06 3:16 ` Feifei Wang
2023-06-06 7:18 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-06-06 7:58 ` Feifei Wang
2023-06-06 8:27 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2023-06-12 3:05 ` Feifei Wang
2023-05-25 9:45 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] net/ixgbe: " Feifei Wang
2023-05-25 9:45 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] app/testpmd: add recycle mbufs engine Feifei Wang
2023-06-05 13:08 ` Константин Ананьев
2023-06-06 6:32 ` Feifei Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211224164613.32569-2-feifei.wang2@arm.com \
--to=feifei.wang2@arm.com \
--cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).