From: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dkozlyuk@nvidia.com>
To: <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>, <stable@dpdk.org>,
Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH] net/mlx5: relax headroom assertion
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 11:20:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211228092043.3360072-1-dkozlyuk@nvidia.com> (raw)
A debug assertion in Single-Packet Receive Queue (SPRQ) mode
required all Rx mbufs to have a 128 byte headroom,
based on the assumption that rte_pktmbuf_init() sets it.
However, rte_pktmbuf_init() may set a smaller headroom
if the dataroom is insufficient, e.g. this is a natural case
for split buffer segments. The headroom can also be larger.
Only check the headroom size when vectored Rx routines
are used because they rely on it. Relax the assertion
to require sufficient headroom size, not an exact one.
Fixes: a0a45e8af723 ("net/mlx5: configure Rx queue for buffer split")
Cc: viacheslavo@nvidia.com
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dkozlyuk@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxq.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxq.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxq.c
index f77d42dedf..baf676d3b4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxq.c
+++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxq.c
@@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ rxq_alloc_elts_sprq(struct mlx5_rxq_ctrl *rxq_ctrl)
unsigned int elts_n = mlx5_rxq_mprq_enabled(&rxq_ctrl->rxq) ?
(1 << rxq_ctrl->rxq.elts_n) * (1 << rxq_ctrl->rxq.strd_num_n) :
(1 << rxq_ctrl->rxq.elts_n);
+ bool has_vec_support = mlx5_rxq_check_vec_support(&rxq_ctrl->rxq) > 0;
unsigned int i;
int err;
@@ -160,8 +161,9 @@ rxq_alloc_elts_sprq(struct mlx5_rxq_ctrl *rxq_ctrl)
rte_errno = ENOMEM;
goto error;
}
- /* Headroom is reserved by rte_pktmbuf_alloc(). */
- MLX5_ASSERT(DATA_OFF(buf) == RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM);
+ /* Only vectored Rx routines rely on headroom size. */
+ MLX5_ASSERT(!has_vec_support ||
+ DATA_OFF(buf) >= RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM);
/* Buffer is supposed to be empty. */
MLX5_ASSERT(rte_pktmbuf_data_len(buf) == 0);
MLX5_ASSERT(rte_pktmbuf_pkt_len(buf) == 0);
@@ -174,7 +176,7 @@ rxq_alloc_elts_sprq(struct mlx5_rxq_ctrl *rxq_ctrl)
(*rxq_ctrl->rxq.elts)[i] = buf;
}
/* If Rx vector is activated. */
- if (mlx5_rxq_check_vec_support(&rxq_ctrl->rxq) > 0) {
+ if (has_vec_support) {
struct mlx5_rxq_data *rxq = &rxq_ctrl->rxq;
struct rte_mbuf *mbuf_init = &rxq->fake_mbuf;
struct rte_pktmbuf_pool_private *priv =
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2021-12-28 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-28 9:20 Dmitry Kozlyuk [this message]
2022-01-13 8:59 ` Raslan Darawsheh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211228092043.3360072-1-dkozlyuk@nvidia.com \
--to=dkozlyuk@nvidia.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=matan@nvidia.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).