From: Nobuhiro MIKI <nmiki@yahoo-corp.jp>
To: ferruh.yigit@intel.com, keith.wiles@intel.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, i.maximets@ovn.org, dmarchan@redhat.com,
Nobuhiro MIKI <nmiki@yahoo-corp.jp>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/1] net/tap: add a check that Rx/Tx have the same num of queues
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 16:43:16 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220119074316.1094-1-nmiki@yahoo-corp.jp> (raw)
Users can create the desired number of RxQ and TxQ in DPDK. For
example, if the number of RxQ = 2 and the number of TxQ = 5,
a total of 8 file descriptors will be created for a tap device,
including RxQ, TxQ, and one for keepalive. The RxQ and TxQ
with the same ID are paired by dup(2).
In this scenario, Kernel will have 3 RxQ where packets are
incoming but not read. The reason for this is that there are only
2 RxQ that are polled by DPDK, while there are 5 queues in Kernel.
This patch add a checking if DPDK has appropriate numbers of
queues to avoid unexpected packet drop.
Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro MIKI <nmiki@yahoo-corp.jp>
---
v3: add doc for this limitation in doc/guides/nics/tap.rst
v2: fix commit message
I had first discussed this issue in OVS [1], but changed my mind
that a fix in DPDK would be more appropriate.
[1]: https://mail.openvswitch.org/pipermail/ovs-dev/2021-November/389690.html
---
doc/guides/nics/tap.rst | 5 +++++
drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c | 8 ++++++++
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/tap.rst b/doc/guides/nics/tap.rst
index 681010d9ed..3d4564b046 100644
--- a/doc/guides/nics/tap.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/nics/tap.rst
@@ -298,3 +298,8 @@ Systems supporting flow API
| Azure Ubuntu 16.04,| No limitation |
| kernel 4.13 | |
+--------------------+-----------------------+
+
+Limitations
+-----------
+
+* Rx/Tx must have the same number of queues.
diff --git a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
index 5bb472f1a6..02eb311e09 100644
--- a/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
+++ b/drivers/net/tap/rte_eth_tap.c
@@ -940,6 +940,14 @@ tap_dev_configure(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
RTE_PMD_TAP_MAX_QUEUES);
return -1;
}
+ if (dev->data->nb_rx_queues != dev->data->nb_tx_queues) {
+ TAP_LOG(ERR,
+ "%s: number of rx queues %d must be equal to number of tx queues %d",
+ dev->device->name,
+ dev->data->nb_rx_queues,
+ dev->data->nb_tx_queues);
+ return -1;
+ }
TAP_LOG(INFO, "%s: %s: TX configured queues number: %u",
dev->device->name, pmd->name, dev->data->nb_tx_queues);
--
2.24.4
next reply other threads:[~2022-01-19 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-19 7:43 Nobuhiro MIKI [this message]
2022-01-26 16:19 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220119074316.1094-1-nmiki@yahoo-corp.jp \
--to=nmiki@yahoo-corp.jp \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dmarchan@redhat.com \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=i.maximets@ovn.org \
--cc=keith.wiles@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).