* [PATCH v5] raw/ifpga: fix pthread cannot join
[not found] <20220121012932.9827-1-wei.huang>
@ 2022-01-21 3:32 ` Wei Huang
2022-01-21 16:19 ` Stephen Hemminger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Wei Huang @ 2022-01-21 3:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev, rosen.xu, qi.z.zhang
Cc: stable, tianfei.zhang, ferruh.yigit, stephen, david.marchand
From: Tianfei Zhang <tianfei.zhang@intel.com>
When we want to close a thread, we should set a flag to notify
thread handler function.
Fixes: 9c006c45 ("raw/ifpga: scan PCIe BDF device tree")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Tianfei Zhang <tianfei.zhang@intel.com>
---
v2: update commit log
---
v3: set thread id to 0 after pthread_join
---
v4: do not evaluate and set pthread_t variable
---
v5: use builtin atomic function to access ifpga_monitor_start flag
---
drivers/raw/ifpga/ifpga_rawdev.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/raw/ifpga/ifpga_rawdev.c b/drivers/raw/ifpga/ifpga_rawdev.c
index 8d9db58..b72c13a 100644
--- a/drivers/raw/ifpga/ifpga_rawdev.c
+++ b/drivers/raw/ifpga/ifpga_rawdev.c
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
static struct ifpga_rawdev ifpga_rawdevices[IFPGA_RAWDEV_NUM];
-static int ifpga_monitor_start;
+static rte_atomic32_t ifpga_monitor_start;
static pthread_t ifpga_monitor_start_thread;
#define IFPGA_MAX_IRQ 12
@@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ static int set_surprise_link_check_aer(
int gsd_enable, ret;
#define MS 1000
- while (1) {
+ while (rte_atomic32_read(&ifpga_monitor_start)) {
gsd_enable = 0;
for (i = 0; i < IFPGA_RAWDEV_NUM; i++) {
ifpga_rdev = &ifpga_rawdevices[i];
@@ -525,7 +525,7 @@ static int set_surprise_link_check_aer(
{
int ret;
- if (ifpga_monitor_start == 0) {
+ if (!rte_atomic32_read(&ifpga_monitor_start)) {
ret = rte_ctrl_thread_create(&ifpga_monitor_start_thread,
"ifpga-monitor", NULL,
ifpga_rawdev_gsd_handle, NULL);
@@ -534,7 +534,7 @@ static int set_surprise_link_check_aer(
"Fail to create ifpga nonitor thread");
return -1;
}
- ifpga_monitor_start = 1;
+ rte_atomic32_set(&ifpga_monitor_start, 1);
}
return 0;
@@ -544,7 +544,9 @@ static int set_surprise_link_check_aer(
{
int ret;
- if (ifpga_monitor_start == 1) {
+ if (rte_atomic32_read(&ifpga_monitor_start)) {
+ rte_atomic32_set(&ifpga_monitor_start, 0);
+
ret = pthread_cancel(ifpga_monitor_start_thread);
if (ret)
IFPGA_RAWDEV_PMD_ERR("Can't cancel the thread");
@@ -553,8 +555,6 @@ static int set_surprise_link_check_aer(
if (ret)
IFPGA_RAWDEV_PMD_ERR("Can't join the thread");
- ifpga_monitor_start = 0;
-
return ret;
}
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v5] raw/ifpga: fix pthread cannot join
2022-01-21 3:32 ` [PATCH v5] raw/ifpga: fix pthread cannot join Wei Huang
@ 2022-01-21 16:19 ` Stephen Hemminger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2022-01-21 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wei Huang
Cc: dev, rosen.xu, qi.z.zhang, stable, tianfei.zhang, ferruh.yigit,
david.marchand
On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 22:32:46 -0500
Wei Huang <wei.huang@intel.com> wrote:
> @@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ static int set_surprise_link_check_aer(
> int gsd_enable, ret;
> #define MS 1000
>
> - while (1) {
> + while (rte_atomic32_read(&ifpga_monitor_start)) {
Better, but rte_atomic is deprecated in favor of using __atomic builtin
instead. This is because there are more options possible with
__atomic_load_n than rte_atomic32_read. rte_atomic32_read has to assume
worst case memory ordering, and your example relaxed memory ordering is
what you need.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-01-21 16:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20220121012932.9827-1-wei.huang>
2022-01-21 3:32 ` [PATCH v5] raw/ifpga: fix pthread cannot join Wei Huang
2022-01-21 16:19 ` Stephen Hemminger
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).