From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: "Min Hu (Connor)" <humin29@huawei.com>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>, <dev@dpdk.org>,
<ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, <maryam.tahhan@intel.com>,
<reshma.pattan@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] app/procinfo: add device private info dump
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 09:04:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220221090457.3d6e6152@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2b87b25c-80ed-9f2b-7a18-01aceca10b24@huawei.com>
On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 10:26:38 +0800
"Min Hu (Connor)" <humin29@huawei.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 在 2022/2/20 16:56, Thomas Monjalon 写道:
> > 20/02/2022 02:04, Stephen Hemminger:
> >> On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 09:59:16 +0800
> >> "Min Hu (Connor)" <humin29@huawei.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +static void
> >>> +show_port_private_info(void)
> >>> +{
> >>> + int i;
> >>> +
> >>> + snprintf(bdr_str, MAX_STRING_LEN, " show - Port PMD Private ");
> >>> + STATS_BDR_STR(10, bdr_str);
> >>> +
> >>> + for (i = 0; i < RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS; i++) {
> >>> + /* Skip if port is not in mask */
> >>> + if ((enabled_port_mask & (1ul << i)) == 0)
> >>> + continue;
> >>> +
> >>> + /* Skip if port is unused */
> >>> + if (!rte_eth_dev_is_valid_port(i))
> >>> + continue;
> >>
> >> Maybe use RTE_ETH_FOREACH_DEV(i) here?
> >>
> >> Procinfo is somewhat inconsistent, some code uses, and some does not.
> >> The difference is that FOREACH skips ports that are "owned" i.e
> >> associated with another port.
> >
> > Yes RTE_ETH_FOREACH_DEV is for general usage,
> > you get only the ports you are supposed to manage.
> >
> >> There probably should be a clear policy in the comments about
> >> how this command should handle ports. My preference would be
> >> that it shows all valid ports, all the time since this is a diagnostic
> >> command used to debug misconfiguration.
> >>
> >> There is RTE_ETH_FOREACH_VALID_DEV but it is marked internal?
> >
> > Yes, you get it right, RTE_ETH_FOREACH_VALID_DEV gets all ports
> > and that should be used only internally or for debugging.
> > If we expose it for debugging purpose, there is a risk of confusion.
> > The goal was to "force" applications to adopt good behaviour,
> > using RTE_ETH_FOREACH_DEV.
> Agree with using RTE_ETH_FOREACH_DEV, v2 has been sent out.
>
> > It means RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS must be used for debugging.
> > Is it a good decision?
> >
> >
> > .
> >
Maybe procinfo should have a flag (--all) to show all devices.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-21 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-19 1:59 Min Hu (Connor)
2022-02-20 1:04 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-02-20 8:56 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-02-21 2:26 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2022-02-21 17:04 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2022-02-22 0:40 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2022-02-21 2:24 ` [PATCH v2] app/procinfo: add devcie " Min Hu (Connor)
2022-04-07 8:09 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2022-04-18 1:11 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2022-04-25 6:44 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2022-05-21 6:54 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2022-05-23 8:43 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-05-25 14:33 ` Pattan, Reshma
2022-05-26 6:01 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2022-05-26 1:10 ` [PATCH v3] app/procinfo: add device " Min Hu (Connor)
2022-06-02 6:22 ` Min Hu (Connor)
2022-06-06 14:39 ` [PATCH v4] " Dongdong Liu
2022-06-13 12:45 ` Dongdong Liu
2022-06-13 12:51 ` Dongdong Liu
2022-06-26 15:50 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-07-02 8:22 ` Dongdong Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220221090457.3d6e6152@hermes.local \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=humin29@huawei.com \
--cc=maryam.tahhan@intel.com \
--cc=reshma.pattan@intel.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).