DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Min Hu (Connor)" <humin29@huawei.com>
To: <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	<xiaoyun.li@intel.com>, <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>,
	<yuying.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] app/testpmd: fix incorrect MTU verification
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 16:45:37 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220406084537.16799-3-humin29@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220406084537.16799-1-humin29@huawei.com>

From: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>

The macro RTE_ETHER_MIN_LEN isn't the minimum value of MTU. But testpmd
used it when execute 'port config mtu 0 xx' cmd. This patch fix it.

Fixes: 1bb4a528c41f ("ethdev: fix max Rx packet length")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) <humin29@huawei.com>
---
 app/test-pmd/cmdline.c |  4 ---
 app/test-pmd/config.c  | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
index 6ffea8e21a..91e4090582 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/cmdline.c
@@ -2050,10 +2050,6 @@ cmd_config_mtu_parsed(void *parsed_result,
 {
 	struct cmd_config_mtu_result *res = parsed_result;
 
-	if (res->value < RTE_ETHER_MIN_LEN) {
-		fprintf(stderr, "mtu cannot be less than %d\n", RTE_ETHER_MIN_LEN);
-		return;
-	}
 	port_mtu_set(res->port_id, res->value);
 }
 
diff --git a/app/test-pmd/config.c b/app/test-pmd/config.c
index bd689f9f86..1b1e738f83 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/config.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/config.c
@@ -1254,6 +1254,57 @@ port_reg_set(portid_t port_id, uint32_t reg_off, uint32_t reg_v)
 	display_port_reg_value(port_id, reg_off, reg_v);
 }
 
+static uint32_t
+eth_dev_get_overhead_len(uint32_t max_rx_pktlen, uint16_t max_mtu)
+{
+	uint32_t overhead_len;
+
+	if (max_mtu != UINT16_MAX && max_rx_pktlen > max_mtu)
+		overhead_len = max_rx_pktlen - max_mtu;
+	else
+		overhead_len = RTE_ETHER_HDR_LEN + RTE_ETHER_CRC_LEN;
+
+	return overhead_len;
+}
+
+static int
+eth_dev_validate_mtu(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t mtu)
+{
+	struct rte_eth_dev_info dev_info;
+	uint32_t overhead_len;
+	uint32_t frame_size;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = rte_eth_dev_info_get(port_id, &dev_info);
+	if (ret != 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (mtu < dev_info.min_mtu) {
+		fprintf(stderr,
+			"MTU (%u) < device min MTU (%u) for port_id %u\n",
+			mtu, dev_info.min_mtu, port_id);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+	if (mtu > dev_info.max_mtu) {
+		fprintf(stderr,
+			"MTU (%u) > device max MTU (%u) for port_id %u\n",
+			mtu, dev_info.max_mtu, port_id);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	overhead_len = eth_dev_get_overhead_len(dev_info.max_rx_pktlen,
+			dev_info.max_mtu);
+	frame_size = mtu + overhead_len;
+	if (frame_size > dev_info.max_rx_pktlen) {
+		fprintf(stderr,
+			"Frame size (%u) > device max frame size (%u) for port_id %u\n",
+			frame_size, dev_info.max_rx_pktlen, port_id);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 void
 port_mtu_set(portid_t port_id, uint16_t mtu)
 {
@@ -1263,6 +1314,10 @@ port_mtu_set(portid_t port_id, uint16_t mtu)
 	if (port_id_is_invalid(port_id, ENABLED_WARN))
 		return;
 
+	diag = eth_dev_validate_mtu(port_id, mtu);
+	if (diag != 0)
+		return;
+
 	if (port->need_reconfig == 0) {
 		diag = rte_eth_dev_set_mtu(port_id, mtu);
 		if (diag != 0) {
-- 
2.33.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-06  8:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-06  8:45 [PATCH 0/2] bugfix for testpmd Min Hu (Connor)
2022-04-06  8:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] app/testpmd: fix stats get when display fwd stats Min Hu (Connor)
2022-04-27 12:15   ` Singh, Aman Deep
2022-04-28  3:10     ` Min Hu (Connor)
2022-04-06  8:45 ` Min Hu (Connor) [this message]
2022-04-25 16:25   ` [PATCH 2/2] app/testpmd: fix incorrect MTU verification Singh, Aman Deep
2022-04-26  1:38     ` lihuisong (C)
2022-05-12 16:37       ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-04-25  6:52 ` [PATCH 0/2] bugfix for testpmd Min Hu (Connor)
2022-05-12 16:37   ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220406084537.16799-3-humin29@huawei.com \
    --to=humin29@huawei.com \
    --cc=aman.deep.singh@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=xiaoyun.li@intel.com \
    --cc=yuying.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).