From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E67A00C4; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 10:23:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DE3540685; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 10:23:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from linux.microsoft.com (linux.microsoft.com [13.77.154.182]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C4B4067B for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 10:23:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1086) id 1B966205845F; Mon, 11 Apr 2022 01:23:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com 1B966205845F DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1649665393; bh=FbyEK4TXY5Sj+fQxqVulV68RK9QdaTlaHKvVO3io83I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=BbBMOS+uFLoX/kOMKK8l5CWUxm3swvDhWHCvnPgh5S4wMr5EblgOUzQSBToSQBidT 8AqimGmaw+H9lJL/cUlGj6RXZFREVGxQt73e1CXy7DJo86VBrcuZ/TeWZYlMXeVzeo SHkz07AULhDwLxnBrIJhzv2NK4KlU9v4rsP6IjIQ= Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 01:23:13 -0700 From: Tyler Retzlaff To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com, ktraynor@redhat.com, maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, rasland@nvidia.com, ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com, honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com, aconole@redhat.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, mdr@ashroe.eu Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] RHEL 7 support Message-ID: <20220411082313.GB19395@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net> References: <2874531.2S3dPSLiCe@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2874531.2S3dPSLiCe@thomas> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 08:33:28PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to open a discussion about RHEL 7 support in DPDK. > How long do we want to support it in new DPDK versions? > Can we drop RHEL 7 support starting DPDK 21.11? did this thread/question ever reach conclusion? > > If we decide to drop RHEL 7 support, does it mean we can generally use > standard C11 atomics? this is still desirable from the perspective of the windows port.