From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 404A7A00BE; Mon, 16 May 2022 22:20:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2058440A7A; Mon, 16 May 2022 22:20:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pj1-f41.google.com (mail-pj1-f41.google.com [209.85.216.41]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B3A74068B for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 16 May 2022 22:20:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pj1-f41.google.com with SMTP id n10so15503508pjh.5 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 16 May 2022 13:20:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8gQIIRzP8cO7FKbd0YIVwMCGiRglDluWZa02ShD9Ga8=; b=vRSuWYyM3a4csk3baqIpBoJYU80m913djePWylgpBAAH5VGVNUF6RA9LRsOiMih3OF d2kkpkeYNuLiXt8JRY0n9q8aompDEjozA2dm/69PqEeO3Ns2QlaeX58dy851omv2iA2J 4468f3YzpAxgvS0LqP3A2PU/GT+yZdX0hLy6AK6/yqxQfmNO4IFkV4+6PIWGdwexR5Hx PirHwqp623IqogQbCQC+poWZ1kERVgdusP63Pmo8SQS9Fei53ov25JYDPtQapUjCGlZw wN7WOcU2IAAofUAZInV4xdk1FOkGZxls1vpb3AZWM+QCZbgSJi5rJer0ZPJ+r78Wy8GF 8fPQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8gQIIRzP8cO7FKbd0YIVwMCGiRglDluWZa02ShD9Ga8=; b=e8w1Km1LYdQqRYTFOdT8pJMgulx/TKxs/9/99eOrtWyjRwPz0cHO6CBLO4QflycVN1 kLbfEZgJxAIrJOxGHyQceX7YSKLrlFujinPFfcbbrQUy/x1WwTtyRxRz4lSXdro7JbSo dORxCOGnpkeycWjYAqr001hDbaQS9/T7eC4DyiMXevmMN07eI3vej1DKssIhUSKwmGkP 9YyH0jbkvW+Ld0RMVQtVLkMmChUH2hbjJcA/1HA+SS7o+W/KfFWeC4OU24kLoiV35Agw TW3aMzgTf4F+n8iIjVOzbIpdhOm2Fx7EKMWr/izmW8+uFSqj8ScwUNTf3L1/MoKB9qz8 +UrQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531oVzL5yjbIP1xgfJrh4jV+/h6puK2rw5EpktIX4U0gbxObcY8Z wWJ+Wmj4m434kwzsKqx6AXvkRA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwlWAezEPFpKojda0qpFKp2R1oYtQvW5XYh4Xd5YzgfIc91FezD7hZPjnzZL+4U304BlEzY7A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:9696:b0:158:f809:310e with SMTP id n22-20020a170902969600b00158f809310emr19208748plp.16.1652732426529; Mon, 16 May 2022 13:20:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-112-199.wavecable.com. [204.195.112.199]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i1-20020a628701000000b0050dc762813dsm7185445pfe.23.2022.05.16.13.20.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 16 May 2022 13:20:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 13:20:23 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> To: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com> Cc: Kai Ji <kai.ji@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org> Subject: Re: [EXT] [dpdk-dev v2 1/5] drivers/crypto: suppress openssl deprecated api warning messages Message-ID: <20220516132023.50e3b79e@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: <CO6PR18MB4484994D69E3ED03BFD1F5D9D8CF9@CO6PR18MB4484.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> References: <20220407163648.38583-1-kai.ji@intel.com> <20220516101039.4537-1-kai.ji@intel.com> <20220516101039.4537-2-kai.ji@intel.com> <CO6PR18MB4484994D69E3ED03BFD1F5D9D8CF9@CO6PR18MB4484.namprd18.prod.outlook.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Mon, 16 May 2022 19:21:01 +0000 Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com> wrote: > Hi Kai, > > Enable openssl_api_compat cflag to suppress deprecated api warning > > messages in crypto pmd drivers: ccp, openssl and qat. > > > > Signed-off-by: Kai Ji <kai.ji@intel.com> > This patch may not be required if we use this > http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20220510150635.61975-1-heinrich.schuchardt@canonical.com/ > Just to be devil's advocate. Why should DPDK continue to support older and unsecure crypto algorithms? I would argue DPDK should deprecate the use of SNA256 and remove it in 22.11 release.