From: xuan.ding@intel.com
To: thomas@monjalon.net, andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru, mdr@ashroe.eu
Cc: stephen@networkplumber.org, mb@smartsharesystems.com,
dev@dpdk.org, Xuan Ding <xuan.ding@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] doc: announce header split deprecation
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 14:20:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220523142016.44451-1-xuan.ding@intel.com> (raw)
From: Xuan Ding <xuan.ding@intel.com>
RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_HEADER_SPLIT offload was introduced some time ago to
substitute bit-field header_split in struct rte_eth_rxmode. It allows
to enable header split offload with the header size controlled using
split_hdr_size in the same structure.
Right now, no single PMD actually supports RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_HEADER_SPLIT
with above definition. Many examples and test apps initialize the field
to 0 explicitly. The most of drivers simply ignore split_hdr_size since
the offload is not advertised, but some double-check that its value is 0.
So the RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_HEADER_SPLIT and split_header_size field
will be removed in DPDK 22.11.
Signed-off-by: Xuan Ding <xuan.ding@intel.com>
---
doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
index 4e5b23c53d..b8114f29ed 100644
--- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
@@ -125,3 +125,7 @@ Deprecation Notices
applications should be updated to use the ``dmadev`` library instead,
with the underlying HW-functionality being provided by the ``ioat`` or
``idxd`` dma drivers
+
+* ethdev: After bit-field header split was removed, the ``RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_HEADER_SPLIT``
+offload and the ``split_hdr_size`` field in structure ``rte_eth_rxmode`` to enable header
+split offload are not supported in any PMDs. They will be removed in DPDK 22.11.
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2022-05-23 14:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-23 14:20 xuan.ding [this message]
2022-05-24 14:58 ` Ray Kinsella
2022-07-12 11:43 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-07-13 9:49 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-07-14 5:50 ` Ding, Xuan
2022-07-14 8:08 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-07-14 12:54 ` Ding, Xuan
2022-07-14 13:25 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-07-14 14:07 ` Ding, Xuan
2022-07-14 15:58 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-07-14 16:03 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-07-15 8:52 ` Ding, Xuan
2022-07-14 16:56 ` Slava Ovsiienko
2022-07-15 8:28 ` Ding, Xuan
2022-07-15 11:34 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-07-15 12:43 ` Ding, Xuan
2022-07-15 12:13 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2022-07-15 12:44 ` Ding, Xuan
2022-07-15 20:30 ` [PATCH v2] " xuan.ding
2022-07-16 21:28 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220523142016.44451-1-xuan.ding@intel.com \
--to=xuan.ding@intel.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).