DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: bugzilla@dpdk.org
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [Bug 1030] rte_malloc() and rte_free() get stuck when used with signal handler
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 08:25:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220609082553.3b875228@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-1030-3@http.bugs.dpdk.org/>

On Thu, 09 Jun 2022 12:47:43 +0000
bugzilla@dpdk.org wrote:

> https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1030
> 
>             Bug ID: 1030
>            Summary: rte_malloc() and rte_free() get stuck when used with
>                     signal handler
>            Product: DPDK
>            Version: 22.03
>           Hardware: All
>                 OS: Linux
>             Status: UNCONFIRMED
>           Severity: normal
>           Priority: Normal
>          Component: core
>           Assignee: dev@dpdk.org
>           Reporter: sarosh.arif@emumba.com
>   Target Milestone: ---
> 
> Created attachment 205
>   --> https://bugs.dpdk.org/attachment.cgi?id=205&action=edit  
> calls rte_malloc and rte_free in the handler and main code
> 
> I have a dpdk based application which uses rte_malloc() and rte_free()
> frequently in it's main code. The general method to close the application is
> though sending SIGINT. The application has a signal handler written for cleanup
> purposes before closing the application. The handler also uses rte_free() to
> release some of the memory during cleanup. The application gets stuck in a
> deadlock.
> 
> 
> Upon investigation I found out that both rte_free() and rte_malloc() use
> rte_spinlock_lock() function to place a lock on heap. While this lock is placed
> and the application receives SIGINT, it goes into the handler without releasing
> the lock. Since the handler itself calls rte_free() which tries to acquire the
> lock it gets stuck. 
> 
> 
> I have attached a sample application to reproduce this problem.
> 
> 
> Steps to reproduce this problem: 
> 
> 1. compile the code provided in attachment with any version of dpdk 
> 2. run the compiled binary
> 3. press ctrl+c till the prints stop 
> 
> Actual Results: 
> The application gets stuck in either rte_free() or rte_malloc()
> 
> Expected Results: 
> Application should allocate and free the memory without getting stuck
> 

rte_malloc and rte_free are not async sigsafe()

but then again regular glibc is not either.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-09 15:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-09 12:47 bugzilla
2022-06-09 15:25 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2022-06-10  6:04   ` Sarosh Arif
2022-06-11 16:25     ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-06-13  9:48       ` Sarosh Arif
2022-10-05 17:30         ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-11-16  9:37 ` bugzilla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220609082553.3b875228@hermes.local \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=bugzilla@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).