From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 364F5A0548; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 16:45:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A078410D0; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 16:45:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pj1-f48.google.com (mail-pj1-f48.google.com [209.85.216.48]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E8340F1A for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 16:45:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pj1-f48.google.com with SMTP id k12-20020a17090a404c00b001eaabc1fe5dso2350642pjg.1 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 07:45:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dc6AQbIbNSup61ET4V3ACKl6ie8b5gLquILCCu4erXQ=; b=dOOETmOa1DXM6iRdbuC2XS4KaekFRYgaBqCt0PqRKYwFbjnqvfhW3k9uaGHq1iE2AP IWloVgrqlkr4DVu2+bywLjmIZq3pqRvlzAjowxY/R++2sTzpBTpKyDAP+eegB1nKJD8w Hv1rUq6s+Qcln1GyHo/zznYQ4Q5BYfIB7oA8nR6H+IE8S/bb4fN8dq8oHJe59tl0TIJD knIuPmXV/zRmOikTc/7HGrIsN58JuXx1yY6jDSYxpJGgrj58xjBQCcTHmYBZqRBJn3Aw fcS1fCsSoYY7ssxWnwTQsB/42lqWvXeA4EUPrJKKy3M1mUi2Vavlvr5aawl9/710j83U IjEQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dc6AQbIbNSup61ET4V3ACKl6ie8b5gLquILCCu4erXQ=; b=Se6RPMQk2j+wbKxJKrb6dZH/Kfe+9XSDgN92nILaCHlXet9VpAkjrgv0/eLWcJz66+ lKnAdXZCfqM/5TXizSUtnX1/mOIH27n17B+SrZO/flHk+Ph433qtNWTvnTLUHgeNnDaZ I9QtxsERsTJLsQgebxwjDhZraMTnz++pDzLsZSMHah6mWlgUy3Tq2/gmFXsS13fvx+Wq H+3oV5lgkTrwh+1mM28WFkxgvj9cntSLCVqQFQkya4DsLgRbewYQPDJoG3uAChpg4+hx 5825Fdzuc2xKy4LRg3gwufa2M6UV0Iva9gmHu+j4G6GBFfOpnQCJwdTB6RFnPqmEPJhj /Yjw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora+g5Azz6wvRse225EDanRCaSiVw6DRSlTF1gbsPKpaIijqMWQNO 7WAbQ1EPQZLPVb9UVDxy/RYcRQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1vYcXiApjc5LBUIgv4KrRAHmNct5f2dI8mhyhYyt97MF32S+uItgPAOTwgB6MRGkYLaSfvDrQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:db06:b0:163:e89d:622c with SMTP id m6-20020a170902db0600b00163e89d622cmr11085plx.143.1655304309002; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 07:45:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-112-199.wavecable.com. [204.195.112.199]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k6-20020a17090a910600b001e31c7aad6fsm1843345pjo.20.2022.06.15.07.45.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 15 Jun 2022 07:45:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 07:45:06 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: David Marchand Cc: dev , Thomas Monjalon , Ferruh Yigit , Bruce Richardson , Morten =?UTF-8?B?QnLDuHJ1cA==?= , Konstantin Ananyev Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] Fix compilation with gcc 12 Message-ID: <20220615074506.464109f6@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: References: <20220518101657.1230416-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Wed, 15 Jun 2022 10:49:17 +0200 David Marchand wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 12:17 PM David Marchand > wrote: > > > > Fedora 36 is out since early may and comes with gcc 12. > > This series fixes compilation or waives some checks. > > > > There might be something fishy with rte_memcpy on x86 but, for now, > > the rte_memcpy related fixes are on the caller side. > > > > Some "base" drivers have issues, I chose the simple solution of waiving > > the checks for them. > > > > Compilation is the only thing checked. > > Please driver maintainers, check nothing got broken. > > I applied the patches that got acked and that had no objection or > comment from maintainers (i.e. patch 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 11). > I also cleaned the mess in bugzilla where we had multiple reports of > the same issues, or stale bugs that I can't reproduce with released > gcc 12. > > I'll respin separately the patches for which I have clear comments, > and drop my patches waiving the compiler checks. > > We still need to agree on the best approach to handle the new checks. > We have two rfc series from Stephen, how do we move forward? Lets fix all the bugs and remove any workarounds using pragma's. Some of them may mean removing rte_memcpy where it is not needed.