From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28863A0566; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 04:09:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B97EF400D7; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 04:09:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pj1-f44.google.com (mail-pj1-f44.google.com [209.85.216.44]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DCFA40042 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2022 04:09:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pj1-f44.google.com with SMTP id n16-20020a17090ade9000b001ed15b37424so14548478pjv.3 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 19:09:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EdUjm/8qeiFO/oV526I1rYiQY/zYc4vlNfz1cU3BsOY=; b=XjqLnFt8HxhgynRg4QDk08G5biDxkr/GyvHJqjkvTfOXHdufa2nB6s3ufC7XC5RhvA ME3HBZc0uksyMVXSV+P1hn8dxoGYGELud2xmTlPbGEBeqkrGnm7YuZlYlJmZDgluEQjA ZWWLj4iMJeaYAFDyIp88Gvs1CwNsSDSrOucIMH79cQpr4rDMSv0ik48Ei6F+ltUxyk0d VGLpTFFM4WZftfNhlii8oRAQUAmdXTrYaF/HUq4vjmR0NxLIbh+Yyy2NATbHfeYtMTBT 0/ZjDYhUZ76RWvIgbn00cVOvchz2O7lg1mL21McG1z3QsyqC0Tw10aJ+NF85A7SRidFe 6b0A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EdUjm/8qeiFO/oV526I1rYiQY/zYc4vlNfz1cU3BsOY=; b=esCxw6nioaYdcG4SbQhBHO8lNPotz55Fc1g2BV5CyBIfVP3Hn9BdHa9DbLrnoUNfe4 AfKeqoFMCpKbQQlqoiaNIA56iB2SdIfxiAWlBfsb3WGMlo2QvzG04rtb9KKSP26IjfIh 9WIGa8lPU5PyOCLQXpM1rODA4xmtCMhp2+35l+XmPlLPfR1lp6SZ2PeVbyfmA886tLf6 lgsufrsBHbAZUvoO6Y+L2D9hWKoa0HsgZT9Ra8Of1hG3CF/MmEplSI01IddCHwIQ8W6K a+4qbFldxcms5iiMSxyVShx3pFDpfEMLdvwOzv9xoV4JzrcdxdlbqEIZoOEyyMl9xXlQ PJuQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora+XoMQc9NX0GRVahL+jqAYqoKZmPUy5iFtw+hTU6IyBpg6QIOlh r0bjriAAGxXruvfvkaPgZtu+3ynqzfnjCJ2m X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1trcEZ6P6qmKQJs/QgmFwuxATuwZKNtd71Os2feLyAdwYaNKEDu87s83Lbgnkhwyxk9l7v4qg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:17d2:b0:1ec:be52:56e2 with SMTP id me18-20020a17090b17d200b001ecbe5256e2mr2877667pjb.207.1656468564174; Tue, 28 Jun 2022 19:09:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-112-199.wavecable.com. [204.195.112.199]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f20-20020a170902ab9400b0016a109c7606sm10056573plr.259.2022.06.28.19.09.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 28 Jun 2022 19:09:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 19:09:21 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: qcqx-obaq.6cba8489@hashmail.org Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: dpdk-devbind.py ./. bonding interfaces Message-ID: <20220628190921.591c6c85@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Sat, 25 Jun 2022 01:13:01 +0200 qcqx-obaq.6cba8489@hashmail.org wrote: > To whom it may concern. > > usertools/dpdk-devbind.py currently does not recognize interfaces > that are part of a bond as active. > that can be a nuisance if you are using something like libmoon which > proactively rebinds drivers for all "not active" interfaces. > > yes, i am aware of the dpdk contribution guideline. > > no, i am not going to jump through linux-kernel level hoops for > a trivial 9-sloc-python driveby-contrib. > > yes, that glorious code is all written by me, i promise i didnt > steal it, and whoever takes pity and merges it is free to claim > full credits for it. > (if you feel bad about claiming credits for something you didnt > write, perhaps find more useful names for "f" and "l" and/or > add some comment above it...) > > yes, i promise i will read and respect the contrib guide if i ever > want to contrib code that took longer to write than it takes to > read the contrib guide. > > regards, > x23 Sounds like a libmoon bug, not a DPDK bug. There are many more types of joined devices in Linux, and just doing bonding seems wrong. Also, since your patch is missing Signed-off-by with a valid name, it can not be accepted.