From: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>
To: <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: <getelson@nvidia.com>, <matan@nvidia.com>, <rasland@nvidia.com>,
"Raja Zidane" <rzidane@nvidia.com>, <stable@dpdk.org>,
Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4] net/mlx5: reject negative integrity item configuration
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2022 13:11:39 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220704101139.934-1-getelson@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220703080202.443-1-getelson@nvidia.com>
From: Raja Zidane <rzidane@nvidia.com>
Negative integrity item refers to condition when the item value mask
is set, but value spec is cleared:
... integrity value mask l4_ok value spec 0 ...
RTE library defines integrity bits `l3_ok` and `l4_ok` as accumulators
for all hardware L3 and L4 integrity verifications respectfully.
Hardware `l3_ok` and `l4_ok` integrity bits refer to L3 and L4
network headers only.
Integrity bits `l3_ok` and `l4_ok` are not compatible between RTE
library and hardware.
PMD translations for RTE `l3_ok` are:
IPv4: `l3_ok` and `l3_csum_ok`
IPv6: `l3_ok`
RTE `l4_ok` is translated into PMD `l4_ok` and `l4_csum_ok` bits.
Positive IPv4 `l3_ok` flow item configuration is translated into
a single matcher that AND corresponding hardware bits.
Negative IPv4 `l3_ok` is translated into 2 hardware conditions where
each condition probes a single integrity bit:
RTE::l3_ok is 0 => MLX5::l3_ok is 0 OR MLX5:l3_csum_ok is 0
MLX5 hardware does not do OR condition in flow rule item.
Negative IPv4 `l3_ok` must be translated into 2 flow rules.
Similarly negative RTE `l4_ok` condition is also translated into 2
hardware rules.
Current PMD roadmap does not allow implicit flow rule split.
TODO: extend RTE integrity bits definition to allow match on each
hardware integrity bit for accumulated integiry matches.
Bugzilla ID: 948
cc: stable@dpdk.org
Proposed-off-by: Raja Zidane rzidane@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
---
v2: fix typo in cc address.
v3:
V4: fix author and version id.
---
doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst | 5 +++--
drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c | 6 ++++++
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst b/doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst
index 9f2832e284..99734157d0 100644
--- a/doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst
@@ -479,14 +479,15 @@ Limitations
- Integrity offload is enabled starting from **ConnectX-6 Dx**.
- Verification bits provided by the hardware are ``l3_ok``, ``ipv4_csum_ok``, ``l4_ok``, ``l4_csum_ok``.
- ``level`` value 0 references outer headers.
+ - Negative integrity item verification is not supported
- Multiple integrity items not supported in a single flow rule.
- Flow rule items supplied by application must explicitly specify network headers referred by integrity item.
For example, if integrity item mask sets ``l4_ok`` or ``l4_csum_ok`` bits, reference to L4 network header,
TCP or UDP, must be in the rule pattern as well::
flow create 0 ingress pattern integrity level is 0 value mask l3_ok value spec l3_ok / eth / ipv6 / end …
- or
- flow create 0 ingress pattern integrity level is 0 value mask l4_ok value spec 0 / eth / ipv4 proto is udp / end …
+
+ flow create 0 ingress pattern integrity level is 0 value mask l4_ok value spec l4_ok / eth / ipv4 proto is udp / end …
- Connection tracking:
diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
index 09349a021b..bee9363515 100644
--- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
+++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_dv.c
@@ -6779,6 +6779,12 @@ flow_dv_validate_item_integrity(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
integrity_item,
"unsupported integrity filter");
+ if ((mask->l3_ok & !spec->l3_ok) || (mask->l4_ok & !spec->l4_ok) ||
+ (mask->ipv4_csum_ok & !spec->ipv4_csum_ok) ||
+ (mask->l4_csum_ok & !spec->l4_csum_ok))
+ return rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL,
+ RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ITEM,
+ NULL, "negative integrity flow is not supported");
if (spec->level > 1) {
if (pattern_flags & MLX5_FLOW_ITEM_INNER_INTEGRITY)
return rte_flow_error_set
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-04 10:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-03 8:02 [PATCH] " Gregory Etelson
2022-07-03 8:08 ` [PATCH v2] " Gregory Etelson
2022-07-04 10:11 ` Gregory Etelson [this message]
2022-07-04 16:23 ` [PATCH v4] " Raslan Darawsheh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220704101139.934-1-getelson@nvidia.com \
--to=getelson@nvidia.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=matan@nvidia.com \
--cc=rasland@nvidia.com \
--cc=rzidane@nvidia.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).