DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: "Carrillo, Erik G" <erik.g.carrillo@intel.com>
Cc: "Naga Harish K, S V" <s.v.naga.harish.k@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] timer: fix function to stop all timers
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 12:38:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220810123833.6838e009@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <IA1PR11MB6418A3667ECEEAF35FD5E45DB9659@IA1PR11MB6418.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 19:29:36 +0000
"Carrillo, Erik G" <erik.g.carrillo@intel.com> wrote:

> Hi Harish,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Naga Harish K, S V <s.v.naga.harish.k@intel.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2022 2:10 AM
> > To: Carrillo, Erik G <erik.g.carrillo@intel.com>
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; stable@dpdk.org
> > Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] timer: fix function to stop all timers
> > 
> > There is a possibility of deadlock in this API, as same spinlock is tried to be
> > acquired in nested manner.
> > 
> > In timer_del function, if the previous owner and current owner lcore are  
> 
> It might be clearer to say something like:
> 
>  "If the lcore that is stopping the timer is different from the lcore that owns the timer, the timer list lock is acquired in timer_del(), even if local_is_locked is true.  Because the same lock was already acquired in rte_timer_stop_all(), the thread will hang."
>   

Yes, the timer owner flag acts like a lock and this is AB BA deadlock

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-10 19:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-03 16:26 [PATCH 3/4] timer: fix rte_timer_stop_all Naga Harish K S V
2022-08-03 17:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-08-10  7:20   ` Naga Harish K, S V
2022-08-10  7:09 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] timer: fix function to stop all timers Naga Harish K S V
2022-08-10 19:29   ` Carrillo, Erik G
2022-08-10 19:38     ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2022-08-11 15:42     ` Naga Harish K, S V
2022-08-11 15:37   ` [PATCH v3 " Naga Harish K S V
2022-08-12 16:07     ` [PATCH v4 " Naga Harish K S V
2022-08-18 13:12       ` Carrillo, Erik G
2022-08-10  7:01 [PATCH v2 " Naga Harish K S V

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220810123833.6838e009@hermes.local \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=erik.g.carrillo@intel.com \
    --cc=s.v.naga.harish.k@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).