DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>
To: chengtcli@qq.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, lic121 <lic121@chinatelecom.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eal: zero out new added memory
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2022 12:57:50 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220827125750.291dd7d1@sovereign> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tencent_F3597A23B9EE72C7633E44F78D66D01F1109@qq.com>

2022-08-27 09:25 (UTC+0000), chengtcli@qq.com:
> From: lic121 <lic121@chinatelecom.cn>
> 
> When RTE_MALLOC_DEBUG not configured, rte_zmalloc_socket() doens't
> zero oute allocaed memory. Because memory are zeroed out when free
> in malloc_elem_free(). But seems the initial allocated memory is
> not zeroed out as expected.
> 
> This patch zero out initial allocated memory in
> malloc_heap_add_memory().
> 
> With dpdk 20.11.5, "QLogic Corp. FastLinQ QL41000" probe triggers
> this problem.
> ```
>   Stack trace of thread 412780:
>   #0  0x0000000000e5fb99 ecore_int_igu_read_cam (dpdk-testpmd)
>   #1  0x0000000000e4df54 ecore_get_hw_info (dpdk-testpmd)
>   #2  0x0000000000e504aa ecore_hw_prepare (dpdk-testpmd)
>   #3  0x0000000000e8a7ca qed_probe (dpdk-testpmd)
>   #4  0x0000000000e83c59 qede_common_dev_init (dpdk-testpmd)
>   #5  0x0000000000e84c8e qede_eth_dev_init (dpdk-testpmd)
>   #6  0x00000000009dd5a7 rte_pci_probe_one_driver (dpdk-testpmd)
>   #7  0x00000000009734e3 rte_bus_probe (dpdk-testpmd)
>   #8  0x00000000009933bd rte_eal_init (dpdk-testpmd)
>   #9  0x000000000041768f main (dpdk-testpmd)
>   #10 0x00007f41a7001b17 __libc_start_main (libc.so.6)
>   #11 0x000000000067e34a _start (dpdk-testpmd)
> ```
> 
> Signed-off-by: lic121 <lic121@chinatelecom.cn>
> ---
>  lib/librte_eal/common/malloc_heap.c | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/malloc_heap.c b/lib/librte_eal/common/malloc_heap.c
> index f4e20ea..1607401 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/malloc_heap.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/malloc_heap.c
> @@ -96,11 +96,19 @@
>  		void *start, size_t len)
>  {
>  	struct malloc_elem *elem = start;
> +	void *ptr;
> +	size_t data_len
> +
>  
>  	malloc_elem_init(elem, heap, msl, len, elem, len);
>  
>  	malloc_elem_insert(elem);
>  
> +	/* Zero out new added memory. */
> +	*ptr = RTE_PTR_ADD(elem, MALLOC_ELEM_HEADER_LEN);
> +	data_len = elem->size - MALLOC_ELEM_OVERHEAD;
> +	memset(ptr, 0, data_len);
> +
>  	elem = malloc_elem_join_adjacent_free(elem);
>  
>  	malloc_elem_free_list_insert(elem);

Hi,

The kernel ensures that the newly mapped memory is zeroed,
and DPDK ensures that files in hugetlbfs are not re-mapped.
What makes you think that it is not zeroed?
Were you able to catch [start; start+len) contain non-zero bytes
at the start of this function?
If so, is it system memory (not an external heap)?
If so, what is the CPU, kernel, any custom settings?

Can it be the PMD or the app that uses rte_malloc instead of rte_zmalloc?

This patch cannot be accepted as-is anyway:
1. It zeroes memory even if the code was called not via rte_zmalloc().
2. It leads to zeroing on both alloc and free, which is suboptimal.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-27  9:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-27  9:25 chengtcli
2022-08-27  9:57 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk [this message]
2022-08-27 13:31   ` lic121
2022-08-27 14:56     ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2022-08-29  1:18       ` lic121
2022-08-29 11:37         ` lic121
2022-08-29 11:57           ` David Marchand
2022-08-29 12:37             ` Morten Brørup
2022-08-29 12:43               ` David Marchand
2022-08-29 12:49               ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2022-08-30  1:11                 ` lic121
2022-08-30  9:49                   ` lic121
2022-08-30 10:59                     ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2022-08-30 12:47                       ` lic121
2022-08-30 12:53                       ` lic121
2022-09-03 13:53                         ` lic121

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220827125750.291dd7d1@sovereign \
    --to=dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com \
    --cc=chengtcli@qq.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=lic121@chinatelecom.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).