From: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>
To: lic121 <chengtcli@qq.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, lic121 <lic121@chinatelecom.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eal: zero out new added memory
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2022 17:56:54 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220827175654.7a167eaf@sovereign> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tencent_AC94450D8DEED0B910997A67B96273F96209@qq.com>
2022-08-27 13:31 (UTC+0000), lic121:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 12:57:50PM +0300, Dmitry Kozlyuk wrote:
> > 2022-08-27 09:25 (UTC+0000), chengtcli@qq.com:
> > > From: lic121 <lic121@chinatelecom.cn>
> > >
> > > When RTE_MALLOC_DEBUG not configured, rte_zmalloc_socket() doens't
> > > zero oute allocaed memory. Because memory are zeroed out when free
> > > in malloc_elem_free(). But seems the initial allocated memory is
> > > not zeroed out as expected.
> > >
> > > This patch zero out initial allocated memory in
> > > malloc_heap_add_memory().
> > >
> > > With dpdk 20.11.5, "QLogic Corp. FastLinQ QL41000" probe triggers
> > > this problem.
> > > ```
> > > Stack trace of thread 412780:
> > > #0 0x0000000000e5fb99 ecore_int_igu_read_cam (dpdk-testpmd)
> > > #1 0x0000000000e4df54 ecore_get_hw_info (dpdk-testpmd)
> > > #2 0x0000000000e504aa ecore_hw_prepare (dpdk-testpmd)
> > > #3 0x0000000000e8a7ca qed_probe (dpdk-testpmd)
> > > #4 0x0000000000e83c59 qede_common_dev_init (dpdk-testpmd)
> > > #5 0x0000000000e84c8e qede_eth_dev_init (dpdk-testpmd)
> > > #6 0x00000000009dd5a7 rte_pci_probe_one_driver (dpdk-testpmd)
> > > #7 0x00000000009734e3 rte_bus_probe (dpdk-testpmd)
> > > #8 0x00000000009933bd rte_eal_init (dpdk-testpmd)
> > > #9 0x000000000041768f main (dpdk-testpmd)
> > > #10 0x00007f41a7001b17 __libc_start_main (libc.so.6)
> > > #11 0x000000000067e34a _start (dpdk-testpmd)
> > > ```
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: lic121 <lic121@chinatelecom.cn>
> > > ---
> > > lib/librte_eal/common/malloc_heap.c | 8 ++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/malloc_heap.c b/lib/librte_eal/common/malloc_heap.c
> > > index f4e20ea..1607401 100644
> > > --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/malloc_heap.c
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/malloc_heap.c
> > > @@ -96,11 +96,19 @@
> > > void *start, size_t len)
> > > {
> > > struct malloc_elem *elem = start;
> > > + void *ptr;
> > > + size_t data_len
> > > +
> > >
> > > malloc_elem_init(elem, heap, msl, len, elem, len);
> > >
> > > malloc_elem_insert(elem);
> > >
> > > + /* Zero out new added memory. */
> > > + *ptr = RTE_PTR_ADD(elem, MALLOC_ELEM_HEADER_LEN);
> > > + data_len = elem->size - MALLOC_ELEM_OVERHEAD;
> > > + memset(ptr, 0, data_len);
> > > +
> > > elem = malloc_elem_join_adjacent_free(elem);
> > >
> > > malloc_elem_free_list_insert(elem);
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The kernel ensures that the newly mapped memory is zeroed,
> > and DPDK ensures that files in hugetlbfs are not re-mapped.
> > What makes you think that it is not zeroed?
> > Were you able to catch [start; start+len) contain non-zero bytes
> > at the start of this function?
> > If so, is it system memory (not an external heap)?
> > If so, what is the CPU, kernel, any custom settings?
> >
> > Can it be the PMD or the app that uses rte_malloc instead of rte_zmalloc?
> >
> > This patch cannot be accepted as-is anyway:
> > 1. It zeroes memory even if the code was called not via rte_zmalloc().
> > 2. It leads to zeroing on both alloc and free, which is suboptimal.
>
> Hi Dmitry, thanks for the review.
>
> In rte_eth_dev_pci_allocate(), imediately after rte_zmalloc_socket()[1]
> I printed
> the content in gdb. It's not zero.
>
> print ((struct qede_dev *)(eth_dev->data->dev_private))->edev->p_iov_info
>
> cpu: Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 5218 CPU @ 2.30GHz
> kernel: 4.19.90-2102
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk/blob/v20.11/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev_pci.h#L91-L93
Sorry, it seems that something is wrong with your debug.
Your link is for 20.11.0.
In 20.11.5 (apparently always) struct qede_dev::edev is not a pointer [2].
Even if it was, in zeroed memory it would be a NULL pointer,
reading a member would give a random value at NULL + some offset.
I suggest to print content of the allocated memory with rte_hexdump().
[2]:
http://git.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/tree/drivers/net/qede/qede_ethdev.h?h=v20.11.5#n223
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-27 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-27 9:25 chengtcli
2022-08-27 9:57 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2022-08-27 13:31 ` lic121
2022-08-27 14:56 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk [this message]
2022-08-29 1:18 ` lic121
2022-08-29 11:37 ` lic121
2022-08-29 11:57 ` David Marchand
2022-08-29 12:37 ` Morten Brørup
2022-08-29 12:43 ` David Marchand
2022-08-29 12:49 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2022-08-30 1:11 ` lic121
2022-08-30 9:49 ` lic121
2022-08-30 10:59 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2022-08-30 12:47 ` lic121
2022-08-30 12:53 ` lic121
2022-09-03 13:53 ` lic121
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220827175654.7a167eaf@sovereign \
--to=dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com \
--cc=chengtcli@qq.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=lic121@chinatelecom.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).