DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/7] telemetry: make array initialization more robust
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 09:50:33 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221214175033.GD31935@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221213182730.97065-5-bruce.richardson@intel.com>

On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 06:27:27PM +0000, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> Rather than relying on a specific ordering of elements in the array
> matching that of elements in the enum definition, we can explicitly mark
> each array entry using the equivalent enum value as an index.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> ---
>  lib/telemetry/telemetry_data.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/telemetry/telemetry_data.c b/lib/telemetry/telemetry_data.c
> index d51724e1f5..9a180937fd 100644
> --- a/lib/telemetry/telemetry_data.c
> +++ b/lib/telemetry/telemetry_data.c
> @@ -16,10 +16,10 @@ int
>  rte_tel_data_start_array(struct rte_tel_data *d, enum rte_tel_value_type type)
>  {
>  	enum tel_container_types array_types[] = {
> -			TEL_ARRAY_STRING, /* RTE_TEL_STRING_VAL = 0 */
> -			TEL_ARRAY_INT,    /* RTE_TEL_INT_VAL = 1 */
> -			TEL_ARRAY_UINT,    /* RTE_TEL_UINT_VAL = 2 */
> -			TEL_ARRAY_CONTAINER, /* RTE_TEL_CONTAINER = 3 */
> +			[RTE_TEL_STRING_VAL] = TEL_ARRAY_STRING,
> +			[RTE_TEL_INT_VAL] = TEL_ARRAY_INT,
> +			[RTE_TEL_UINT_VAL] = TEL_ARRAY_UINT,
> +			[RTE_TEL_CONTAINER] = TEL_ARRAY_CONTAINER,
>  	};

i might be a bit fuzzy and didn't double check but doesn't doing this
require C99?

though it would be great to move to a minimum of C99/C11

>  	d->type = array_types[type];
>  	d->data_len = 0;
> -- 
> 2.34.1

  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-14 17:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-13 18:27 [RFC PATCH 0/7] Standardize telemetry int types Bruce Richardson
2022-12-13 18:27 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] telemetry: rename unsigned 64-bit enum value to uint Bruce Richardson
2022-12-14 17:30   ` Tyler Retzlaff
2022-12-15  9:41     ` Bruce Richardson
2022-12-15 17:53       ` Tyler Retzlaff
2022-12-13 18:27 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] telemetry: add uint type as alias for u64 Bruce Richardson
2022-12-14 17:38   ` Tyler Retzlaff
2022-12-15  9:44     ` Bruce Richardson
2022-12-15 13:36       ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-12-15 13:58         ` Bruce Richardson
2022-12-19 10:37           ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-12-19 13:22             ` Bruce Richardson
2022-12-15 17:58       ` Tyler Retzlaff
2022-12-15  1:49   ` lihuisong (C)
2022-12-15  9:42     ` Bruce Richardson
2022-12-15 18:02       ` Tyler Retzlaff
2022-12-13 18:27 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] telemetry: remove RTE prefix from internal enum values Bruce Richardson
2022-12-13 18:27 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] telemetry: make array initialization more robust Bruce Richardson
2022-12-14 17:50   ` Tyler Retzlaff [this message]
2023-01-09 12:16     ` Bruce Richardson
2023-01-09 17:49       ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-10  9:11         ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-12-13 18:27 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] telemetry: update json functions to use int/uint in names Bruce Richardson
2022-12-13 18:27 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] telemetry: make internal int representation 64-bits Bruce Richardson
2022-12-13 18:27 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] telemetry: change public API to use 64-bit signed values Bruce Richardson
2022-12-13 20:19   ` Morten Brørup
2022-12-14 17:53     ` Tyler Retzlaff
2022-12-15  2:39       ` lihuisong (C)
2023-01-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] Standardize telemetry int types Bruce Richardson
2023-01-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 1/9] telemetry: remove RTE prefix from internal enum values Bruce Richardson
2023-01-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 2/9] telemetry: make array initialization more robust Bruce Richardson
2023-01-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 3/9] telemetry: rename unsigned 64-bit enum value to uint Bruce Richardson
2023-01-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 4/9] telemetry: add uint type as alias for u64 Bruce Richardson
2023-01-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 5/9] global: rename telemetry functions to newer versions Bruce Richardson
2023-01-12 10:59   ` [PATCH v2 6/9] telemetry: mark old names of renamed fns as deprecated Bruce Richardson
2023-01-12 10:59   ` [PATCH v2 7/9] telemetry: update json functions to use int/uint in names Bruce Richardson
2023-01-12 10:59   ` [PATCH v2 8/9] telemetry: make internal int representation 64-bits Bruce Richardson
2023-01-12 10:59   ` [PATCH v2 9/9] telemetry: change public API to use 64-bit signed values Bruce Richardson
2023-01-12 17:41 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] Standardize telemetry int types Bruce Richardson
2023-01-12 17:41   ` [PATCH v3 1/9] telemetry: remove RTE prefix from internal enum values Bruce Richardson
2023-01-12 17:41   ` [PATCH v3 2/9] telemetry: make array initialization more robust Bruce Richardson
2023-01-12 17:41   ` [PATCH v3 3/9] telemetry: rename unsigned 64-bit enum value to uint Bruce Richardson
2023-01-12 17:41   ` [PATCH v3 4/9] telemetry: add uint type as alias for u64 Bruce Richardson
2023-01-12 17:41   ` [PATCH v3 5/9] global: rename telemetry functions to newer versions Bruce Richardson
2023-01-12 17:41   ` [PATCH v3 6/9] telemetry: mark old names of renamed fns as deprecated Bruce Richardson
2023-01-12 17:41   ` [PATCH v3 7/9] telemetry: update json functions to use int/uint in names Bruce Richardson
2023-01-12 17:41   ` [PATCH v3 8/9] telemetry: make internal int representation 64-bits Bruce Richardson
2023-01-12 17:41   ` [PATCH v3 9/9] telemetry: change public API to use 64-bit signed values Bruce Richardson
2023-02-05 22:55     ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-01-13 16:39   ` [PATCH v3 0/9] Standardize telemetry int types Power, Ciara
2023-02-05 23:15     ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221214175033.GD31935@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net \
    --to=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).