DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, thomas@monjalon.net, mb@smartsharesystems.com,
	bruce.richardson@intel.com,
	Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] eal: provide leading and trailing zero bit count abstraction
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 10:37:59 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230110183759.GB21476@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7d1d6509-83e0-ce20-ac26-b72f4c0ba02d@amd.com>

On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 01:55:59PM +0000, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 1/9/2023 5:36 PM, Tyler Retzlaff wrote:
> > From: Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@microsoft.com>
> > 
> > Provide an abstraction for leading and trailing zero bit counting
> > functions to hide compiler specific intrinsics and builtins.
> > 
> > Include basic unit test of following functions added.
> > 
> >     rte_clz32
> >     rte_clz64
> >     rte_ctz32
> >     rte_ctz64
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
> > ---
> >  app/test/meson.build         |   2 +
> >  app/test/test_bitcount.c     |  71 ++++++++++++++++++
> >  lib/eal/include/rte_bitops.h | 168 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 241 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 app/test/test_bitcount.c
> > 
> > diff --git a/app/test/meson.build b/app/test/meson.build
> > index f34d19e..d1277bc 100644
> > --- a/app/test/meson.build
> > +++ b/app/test/meson.build
> > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ test_sources = files(
> >          'test_alarm.c',
> >          'test_atomic.c',
> >          'test_barrier.c',
> > +        'test_bitcount.c',
> >          'test_bitops.c',
> >          'test_bitmap.c',
> >          'test_bpf.c',
> > @@ -160,6 +161,7 @@ test_deps += ['bus_pci', 'bus_vdev']
> >  fast_tests = [
> >          ['acl_autotest', true, true],
> >          ['atomic_autotest', false, true],
> > +        ['bitcount_autotest', true, true],
> >          ['bitmap_autotest', true, true],
> >          ['bpf_autotest', true, true],
> >          ['bpf_convert_autotest', true, true],
> > diff --git a/app/test/test_bitcount.c b/app/test/test_bitcount.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..36eb05c
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/app/test/test_bitcount.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> > + * Copyright (C) 2022 Microsoft Corporation
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <string.h>
> > +
> > +#include <rte_bitops.h>
> > +#include <rte_debug.h>
> > +
> > +#include "test.h"
> > +
> > +RTE_LOG_REGISTER(bitcount_logtype_test, test.bitcount, INFO);
> > +
> > +static int
> > +test_clz32(void)
> > +{
> > +	uint32_t v = 1;
> > +	RTE_TEST_ASSERT(rte_clz32(v) == sizeof(v) * CHAR_BIT - 1,
> > +	    "Unexpected count.");
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int
> > +test_clz64(void)
> > +{
> > +	uint64_t v = 1;
> > +	RTE_TEST_ASSERT(rte_clz64(v) == sizeof(v) * CHAR_BIT - 1,
> > +	    "Unexpected count.");
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int
> > +test_ctz32(void)
> > +{
> > +	uint32_t v = 2;
> > +	RTE_TEST_ASSERT(rte_ctz32(v) == 1, "Unexpected count.");
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int
> > +test_ctz64(void)
> > +{
> > +	uint64_t v = 2;
> > +	RTE_TEST_ASSERT(rte_ctz64(v) == 1, "Unexpected count.");
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct unit_test_suite bitcount_test_suite = {
> > +	.suite_name = "bitcount autotest",
> > +	.setup = NULL,
> > +	.teardown = NULL,
> > +	.unit_test_cases = {
> > +		TEST_CASE(test_clz32),
> > +		TEST_CASE(test_clz64),
> > +		TEST_CASE(test_ctz32),
> > +		TEST_CASE(test_ctz64),
> > +		TEST_CASES_END()
> > +	}
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int
> > +test_bitcount(void)
> > +{
> > +	return unit_test_suite_runner(&bitcount_test_suite);
> > +}
> > +
> > +REGISTER_TEST_COMMAND(bitcount_autotest, test_bitcount);
> > diff --git a/lib/eal/include/rte_bitops.h b/lib/eal/include/rte_bitops.h
> > index 531479e..387d7aa 100644
> > --- a/lib/eal/include/rte_bitops.h
> > +++ b/lib/eal/include/rte_bitops.h
> > @@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
> >  /* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> >   * Copyright(c) 2020 Arm Limited
> > + * Copyright(c) 2010-2019 Intel Corporation
> > + * Copyright(c) 2023 Microsoft Corporation
> >   */
> >  
> >  #ifndef _RTE_BITOPS_H_
> > @@ -275,6 +277,172 @@
> >  	return val & mask;
> >  }
> >  
> > +#ifdef RTE_TOOLCHAIN_MSVC
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * @warning
> > + * @b EXPERIMENTAL: this API may change, or be removed, without prior notice
> > + *
> > + * Get the count of leading 0-bits in v.
> > + *
> > + * @param v
> > + *   The value.
> > + * @return
> > + *   The count of leading zero bits.
> > + */
> > +__rte_experimental
> > +static inline unsigned int
> > +rte_clz32(uint32_t v)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long rv;
> > +
> > +	(void)_BitScanReverse(&rv, v);
> > +
> > +	return (unsigned int)rv;
> > +}
> 
> 
> OK, this looks wrong to me,
> 
> 
> '_BitScanReverse' is [1]:
> "Search the mask data from most significant bit (MSB) to least
> significant bit (LSB) for a set bit (1)."
> 
> As far as I can see index starts from zero and from lsb to msb.
> 
> So _BitScanReverse() returns following index values:
> 0x2 => 1
> 0xffffffff => 31
> 
> If above is correct, above function doesn't return number of leading
> zeros, but it should return "31 - (unsigned int)rv".
> 
> Please check godbolt experiment for above:
> https://godbolt.org/z/znYn54f57
> 
> 
> As far as I can see unit test is correct, so above should fail with
> windows compiler, and I assume you run unit test with windows compiler,
> so probably I am missing something but please help me understand.

the test is wrong, i will fix both the test and the implementation.

thank you for the careful review.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-01-10 18:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-23 22:14 [PATCH 0/2] eal: provide leading and trailing zero bit count Tyler Retzlaff
2022-11-23 22:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] eal: provide leading and trailing zero bit count abstraction Tyler Retzlaff
2023-04-03 21:46   ` Mattias Rönnblom
2022-11-23 22:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] test/bitcount: add bitcount tests Tyler Retzlaff
2022-11-23 23:43 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] eal: provide leading and trailing zero bit count Tyler Retzlaff
2022-11-23 23:43   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] eal: provide leading and trailing zero bit count abstraction Tyler Retzlaff
2022-11-24 10:17     ` Morten Brørup
2022-11-28 17:13       ` Tyler Retzlaff
2022-11-28 17:22         ` Morten Brørup
2022-11-28 17:27           ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-05  9:04             ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-01-05 17:23               ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-05 17:27                 ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-05 20:57                   ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-05 21:34                     ` Morten Brørup
2023-01-05 22:06                       ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-05 23:10                         ` Morten Brørup
2023-01-06  1:04                           ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-06 10:09                             ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-01-06 10:00                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-01-05  7:09     ` Morten Brørup
2023-01-05  9:01       ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-01-05 17:21         ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-06  0:32           ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-01-06 11:48             ` Bruce Richardson
2023-01-06 12:41               ` Morten Brørup
2023-01-06 13:40                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-01-06 18:58                   ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-06 20:51                     ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-01-10  9:18                       ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-01-06 18:47               ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-09  8:50                 ` Bruce Richardson
2023-04-04 21:23       ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-04-05  8:44         ` Bruce Richardson
2023-04-05 15:22           ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-04-05 15:51             ` Bruce Richardson
2023-04-05 17:25               ` Tyler Retzlaff
2022-11-23 23:43   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] test/bitcount: add bitcount tests Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-04 23:46   ` [PATCH v2 0/2] eal: provide leading and trailing zero bit count Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-09 17:36   ` [PATCH v4 0/2] eal: provide leading and trailing zero bit count abstraction Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-09 17:36     ` [PATCH v4 1/2] eal: move bit operation functions from common to bitops header Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-10 13:56       ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-01-09 17:36     ` [PATCH v4 2/2] eal: provide leading and trailing zero bit count abstraction Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-10 13:55       ` Ferruh Yigit
2023-01-10 17:34         ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-10 18:37         ` Tyler Retzlaff [this message]
2023-01-10 13:56     ` [PATCH v4 0/2] " Ferruh Yigit
2023-01-06 22:01 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] eal: provide leading and trailing zero bit count Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-06 22:01   ` [PATCH v3 1/3] eal: move bit functions from common to bitops header Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-06 22:01   ` [PATCH v3 2/3] eal: provide leading and trailing zero bit count abstraction Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-06 22:01   ` [PATCH v3 3/3] test/bitcount: add bitcount tests Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-07  8:15     ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-01-09 16:57       ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-09 17:26         ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-07 13:40     ` Morten Brørup
2023-01-09  8:51   ` [PATCH v3 0/3] eal: provide leading and trailing zero bit count Bruce Richardson
2023-01-10 19:38 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] eal: provide leading and trailing zero bit count abstraction Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-10 19:38   ` [PATCH v5 1/2] eal: move bit operation common to bitops header Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-10 19:38   ` [PATCH v5 2/2] eal: provide leading and trailing zero bit count abstraction Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-10 19:46 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] " Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-10 19:46   ` [PATCH v6 1/2] eal: move bit operation common to bitops header Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-10 19:46   ` [PATCH v6 2/2] eal: provide leading and trailing zero bit count abstraction Tyler Retzlaff
2023-01-20 22:14   ` [PATCH v6 0/2] " Tyler Retzlaff
2023-02-02  9:14     ` David Marchand
2023-02-02 10:56       ` David Marchand
2023-02-02 15:57         ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-02-03  9:14           ` David Marchand
2023-02-02 15:56       ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-02-03  9:21         ` David Marchand
2023-04-01  0:45 ` [PATCH v7 0/4] eal: provide abstracted bit counting functions Tyler Retzlaff
2023-04-01  0:45   ` [PATCH v7 1/4] eal: move bit count functions to bitops header Tyler Retzlaff
2023-04-01  0:45   ` [PATCH v7 2/4] eal: provide abstracted bit count functions Tyler Retzlaff
2023-04-01  0:45   ` [PATCH v7 3/4] pipeline: add include of bitops Tyler Retzlaff
2023-04-01  0:45   ` [PATCH v7 4/4] maintainers: add bitcount test under EAL API and common code Tyler Retzlaff
2023-04-01  7:08   ` [PATCH v7 0/4] eal: provide abstracted bit counting functions Morten Brørup
2023-04-04  0:11 ` [PATCH v8 0/3] " Tyler Retzlaff
2023-04-04  0:11   ` [PATCH v8 1/3] eal: move bit count functions to bitops header Tyler Retzlaff
2023-04-04  0:11   ` [PATCH v8 2/3] eal: provide abstracted bit count functions Tyler Retzlaff
2023-04-04  0:11   ` [PATCH v8 3/3] maintainers: add bitcount test under EAL API and common code Tyler Retzlaff
2023-04-04  8:27   ` [PATCH v8 0/3] eal: provide abstracted bit counting functions Bruce Richardson
2023-08-25  8:41   ` David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230110183759.GB21476@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net \
    --to=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
    --cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    --cc=roretzla@microsoft.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).