From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E7F141C8E;
Tue, 14 Feb 2023 03:20:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D78D842F84;
Tue, 14 Feb 2023 03:19:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-pf1-f178.google.com (mail-pf1-f178.google.com
[209.85.210.178])
by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FD3042D56
for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2023 03:19:35 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-pf1-f178.google.com with SMTP id bt14so2401663pfb.13
for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 13 Feb 2023 18:19:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=networkplumber-org.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to
:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date
:message-id:reply-to;
bh=kFRl8j+YQC8GSnvt8uJaAlHH4NW76fDU6O3JskDGXTA=;
b=EJD+UT6CMqoBDfp7j/rFgLMQboA0jraPqwgmxATsdRTNnz2dxG15qcY8fIajx4tHjr
VRxE5jg2j4DsAfWipjK1wmZ0+sfQwfbGkDTlXkCXsRj/cUByTOSKdT4mUY3kfvx+LyJP
CFdmzyracLwb2Bw4efa3OYBqTSImNTjTE1YKHJf8uMt0rqZOcPjF3v3tasQM4br1JCbe
AO1Hmyek6vHVBfpZFU7SXCUlG/WdN3cyjVzL4HOMWFhWWs4KRYHw9IH1+T8HZVsvOCUr
C6APMleByz7fD2OqMcdaSr6p1zx2CXoLDjeicSectqLJOq53mXVB9RA7ImWRF390XWlv
jkYQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to
:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=kFRl8j+YQC8GSnvt8uJaAlHH4NW76fDU6O3JskDGXTA=;
b=jrN4dp2d73T2A3G7WvPII7iZ7McdM42AkNs9vUsR2EJ8Y+HTHzhont+3q96kE5+kRH
caFuV58s4/akdnoAa4gFnXfxZA+EwLEEbc09sN6D/SqpDoGfdIOmdru8Koau5nT5ozij
Wt2PHpILz0QWleqoru3NSMt87BzC/Y7IjooxTxe814s/1fegAFWWvo77IH0x8wChRYSM
hYBTdhMBYx+2SYBz/Bx8Fz6berZIywe1W3WTkFe7PI4lkwtDmRpaTTrUbLDywV84Se2G
ChnMH7ERhuSUszpHA2qIHPfybPNMFQDSKXxjw8Bc/Lc5YUMqfHkn00FtlHRSxOWY47ZB
Usrw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKUaHymtvnD8lZfwhBd0y7FW5FM9ZiglFGWGJ6cjjx7TKNJPOWzZ
gZoeKeyMvGU/jzSkNr0vxMxLRxUm7Ea501mXNBE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set+k0fIM/9DXcqBKVBm2hERfivIlO9EjYdU+9UdIN8vhUfDbh6mBQGgbbes5ZlqeNVSYlCTZpg==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:cf03:0:b0:5a8:cf20:e35e with SMTP id
b3-20020a62cf03000000b005a8cf20e35emr570943pfg.3.1676341174259;
Mon, 13 Feb 2023 18:19:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hermes.local (204-195-120-218.wavecable.com. [204.195.120.218])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
e16-20020aa78250000000b005a75d85c0c7sm8494840pfn.51.2023.02.13.18.19.33
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
Mon, 13 Feb 2023 18:19:33 -0800 (PST)
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>, akhil.goyal@nxp.com,
Radu Nicolau <radu.nicolau@intel.com>, Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>,
Aviad Yehezkel <aviadye@mellanox.com>,
Boris Pismenny <borisp@mellanox.com>,
Declan Doherty <declan.doherty@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 15/22] examples/ipsecgw: replace RTE_LOGTYPE_PORT
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 18:19:01 -0800
Message-Id: <20230214021908.1396498-16-stephen@networkplumber.org>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.1
In-Reply-To: <20230214021908.1396498-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
References: <20230207204151.1503491-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
<20230214021908.1396498-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
<mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
<mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Looks like some code got copy/paste in to the IPSEC gateway
example from another place. Shouldn't be using RTE_LOGTYPE_PORT
here.
Fixes: ec17993a145a ("examples/ipsec-secgw: support security offload")
Cc: akhil.goyal@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---
examples/ipsec-secgw/sa.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/examples/ipsec-secgw/sa.c b/examples/ipsec-secgw/sa.c
index 7da9444a7b8a..67327fda8dbc 100644
--- a/examples/ipsec-secgw/sa.c
+++ b/examples/ipsec-secgw/sa.c
@@ -1127,7 +1127,7 @@ check_eth_dev_caps(uint16_t portid, uint32_t inbound, uint32_t tso)
if (inbound) {
if ((dev_info.rx_offload_capa &
RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_SECURITY) == 0) {
- RTE_LOG(WARNING, PORT,
+ RTE_LOG(WARNING, IPSEC,
"hardware RX IPSec offload is not supported\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -1135,13 +1135,13 @@ check_eth_dev_caps(uint16_t portid, uint32_t inbound, uint32_t tso)
} else { /* outbound */
if ((dev_info.tx_offload_capa &
RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_SECURITY) == 0) {
- RTE_LOG(WARNING, PORT,
+ RTE_LOG(WARNING, IPSEC,
"hardware TX IPSec offload is not supported\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
if (tso && (dev_info.tx_offload_capa &
RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_TSO) == 0) {
- RTE_LOG(WARNING, PORT,
+ RTE_LOG(WARNING, IPSEC,
"hardware TCP TSO offload is not supported\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
--
2.39.1