From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D31CB41D43;
Wed, 22 Feb 2023 22:57:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 119204320C;
Wed, 22 Feb 2023 22:56:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-pf1-f169.google.com (mail-pf1-f169.google.com
[209.85.210.169])
by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEC88431A0
for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 22:56:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-pf1-f169.google.com with SMTP id g12so5285428pfi.0
for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 13:56:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=networkplumber-org.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to
:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date
:message-id:reply-to;
bh=kFRl8j+YQC8GSnvt8uJaAlHH4NW76fDU6O3JskDGXTA=;
b=OGyu/4/Qe4H9y8xz44rHnYHCSsj5SDLcZMpzwEIYHKLYyu4DvljErqY8ztDCu2/LXM
HqCLg1+HssTD2Y1ouHltquOHCc7b62aLdWjNNRXYGYXw0U6+KhyJvcjeXmvD1jxDE387
ljKfAqSzNMtXIO11ipqse9BFZHnDBRGT6HERZ6glrWk38uiDGfDPwv3S5ljgLG4WJ0+j
8OGdOXIuwulW8Y7jF4fQHkSOFJVlgtW1BSBQCIrbjo5OZQyrMY5CWAAaWmysuY6OuNHb
CadoU2Z14MmZYoFrpE+5YLUgbeL+Xf6PXMF+0gaQK4o1Y6cpqXIIBOe4IgVnxYPNecYT
NoYA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to
:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=kFRl8j+YQC8GSnvt8uJaAlHH4NW76fDU6O3JskDGXTA=;
b=LMg+4VafjU/neR6msKrgDJ9kWHENszDeBT6sjI1uY7ArJNStIL4PmXd6tWl19vrTul
Ta8OIkVMNIBg8iI+mvVj8RHbgIxFwPT2omtxwwErkjlk843xkZrF8d5HxKYu1J8nMcAj
SjVLjYbrnEpZ+rVRC5lyLunlDYb0YDxzs3Bf0GGUcLR6HB0pkpzBMrH6onv+G84EQDCF
HEg8HR2BRSLzkuPa/ujpsQsu+Wh1QysnDmnKlQjukORr2/nedhRXyy9j337gAPchWO+G
/Vh8lMTr6V5+5c31W94tDRPjuzM3jyBFNd+NbXrk5cQ/gbMUHEoD/XCHzlhrQgDuR5Ng
o9LQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKWgo17C09XqEFDrqgqfCDquoUOH/3kbDLbwxCHp8Sdm6Os4Yhp/
yy0Ic7JK2+IRCRqVEWCI8CAl7JpB08BiS8Nzjt4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set8S9Zw/YbClFAbysykazKc5iIFhYjRqPIPyX/M3N4/dktLgMq9NkvWJGAz9FlabWvzCDayFLg==
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:948c:0:b0:5aa:60b8:87d4 with SMTP id
z12-20020aa7948c000000b005aa60b887d4mr10342980pfk.3.1677102963584;
Wed, 22 Feb 2023 13:56:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hermes.local (204-195-120-218.wavecable.com. [204.195.120.218])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
d7-20020aa78147000000b00571cdbd0771sm6400722pfn.102.2023.02.22.13.56.02
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
Wed, 22 Feb 2023 13:56:03 -0800 (PST)
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>, akhil.goyal@nxp.com,
Radu Nicolau <radu.nicolau@intel.com>, Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>,
Declan Doherty <declan.doherty@intel.com>,
Aviad Yehezkel <aviadye@mellanox.com>, Boris Pismenny <borisp@mellanox.com>
Subject: [PATCH v11 15/22] examples/ipsecgw: replace RTE_LOGTYPE_PORT
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 13:55:34 -0800
Message-Id: <20230222215541.158205-16-stephen@networkplumber.org>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.1
In-Reply-To: <20230222215541.158205-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
References: <20230207204151.1503491-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
<20230222215541.158205-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
<mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
<mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Looks like some code got copy/paste in to the IPSEC gateway
example from another place. Shouldn't be using RTE_LOGTYPE_PORT
here.
Fixes: ec17993a145a ("examples/ipsec-secgw: support security offload")
Cc: akhil.goyal@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
---
examples/ipsec-secgw/sa.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/examples/ipsec-secgw/sa.c b/examples/ipsec-secgw/sa.c
index 7da9444a7b8a..67327fda8dbc 100644
--- a/examples/ipsec-secgw/sa.c
+++ b/examples/ipsec-secgw/sa.c
@@ -1127,7 +1127,7 @@ check_eth_dev_caps(uint16_t portid, uint32_t inbound, uint32_t tso)
if (inbound) {
if ((dev_info.rx_offload_capa &
RTE_ETH_RX_OFFLOAD_SECURITY) == 0) {
- RTE_LOG(WARNING, PORT,
+ RTE_LOG(WARNING, IPSEC,
"hardware RX IPSec offload is not supported\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -1135,13 +1135,13 @@ check_eth_dev_caps(uint16_t portid, uint32_t inbound, uint32_t tso)
} else { /* outbound */
if ((dev_info.tx_offload_capa &
RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_SECURITY) == 0) {
- RTE_LOG(WARNING, PORT,
+ RTE_LOG(WARNING, IPSEC,
"hardware TX IPSec offload is not supported\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
if (tso && (dev_info.tx_offload_capa &
RTE_ETH_TX_OFFLOAD_TCP_TSO) == 0) {
- RTE_LOG(WARNING, PORT,
+ RTE_LOG(WARNING, IPSEC,
"hardware TCP TSO offload is not supported\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
--
2.39.1