From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2D42428B3;
	Wed,  5 Apr 2023 03:04:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7558840FDF;
	Wed,  5 Apr 2023 03:04:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-pl1-f169.google.com (mail-pl1-f169.google.com
 [209.85.214.169])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 678D040DDC
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed,  5 Apr 2023 03:04:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-pl1-f169.google.com with SMTP id u10so32969150plz.7
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 04 Apr 2023 18:04:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=networkplumber-org.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; t=1680656693;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to
 :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date
 :message-id:reply-to;
 bh=qaHk09FxnpaavDEeuR1v5lyOalkpVcyidm0o5RXokiY=;
 b=f2tuJNx8tF9OgtW7mKst3qHwDgujMOmS45+G/pQUutz3eknofpbnwBF8itkY4PsNKd
 kfdiMiBa+PiKqjexSii8BcgT7yTq1XBaFmLg0ey2glkCMyMbDkpaOFzoDg+2fnhdE9M8
 Zsfz4DBkx428Ztad5MO849M1EVImPS5amsWRjB/8xZ2Kfo5LfzN0U3RZPUXTTCKZkB07
 RGb08haFnv+TPzD+KMHF/kFWrTxSNwr7AUgMaW9NghdO4w7MdjUn2FprJWFxG8iHxJwb
 3Fs0wUYfXrE6HQusSwUqWUz6MHL61Kf1Vu/b0rMSieNs7pgRX10xsSkHqtNL4lLH7rsl
 a2vw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1680656693;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to
 :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
 :subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=qaHk09FxnpaavDEeuR1v5lyOalkpVcyidm0o5RXokiY=;
 b=WyllyAN+RB6ajugXK7olp1hcfXpxWQWfFdAwXB+tl60nn26c40pVdixR6JyQxglcKL
 1ONs+baQhThrMgEQXDcdfxvdjILVULosTfLHofDsKV+lOgIL7VhrKMb1VDZlSKFEDdQG
 BA43sPukeZW+COvz85dJ5GeV5+lCNgR94QaRs5tf0C/7Oz08pnFs81+IDDU2Mc3k6VNL
 Y+3O6+XaysHSuG2XmctJY2u8fJmGC4pyh2J0oa/y7muvH0X8d8CvfQ2wovZ65oKnXSiR
 Ee8+7o0AkjkQHTE1GmEwIXvQ1NAuA0jCfJEepXHhbUM/I/YRXpkvlnXI+tslRqn7dBUv
 tcYA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9chbceE1ciM+eRa+BwEixYl0aWroAnq4DOgWmNeej1H7IYVSva5
 C3RAkyPAU0YXOaa4X5pVx916aA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350Y3p4JavXkZnG0ybQ5QpzUcKnosjwuGb9S81LVPHXkgBW1MQCnpzRS7oP2W+vn96q+pdq/WMg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:380d:b0:23f:3:49c5 with SMTP id
 mq13-20020a17090b380d00b0023f000349c5mr4812195pjb.2.1680656693473; 
 Tue, 04 Apr 2023 18:04:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hermes.local (204-195-120-218.wavecable.com. [204.195.120.218])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 p22-20020a17090a429600b00232cc61e16bsm153774pjg.35.2023.04.04.18.04.35
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Tue, 04 Apr 2023 18:04:43 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2023 18:04:32 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>, <dev@dpdk.org>,
 <ciara.power@intel.com>, <david.marchand@redhat.com>, <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] telemetry: use malloc instead of variable length array
Message-ID: <20230404180432.2dc01862@hermes.local>
In-Reply-To: <ZCvkGY8J0qakKfqX@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <1680539424-20255-1-git-send-email-roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
 <1680539424-20255-2-git-send-email-roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
 <20230403131913.0aec54ce@hermes.local>
 <ZCvkGY8J0qakKfqX@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org

On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 09:47:21 +0100
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:

> My suggestion is to use a combination of these methods. In json_snprintf
> check if the input buffer is empty or has only one character in it, and use
> method #2 if so. If that's not the case, then fallback to method #1 and do
> a double snprintf.
> 
> Make sense? Any other suggestions?

Glibc has asprintf which allocates the buffer for you.