From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EE914298A;
Wed, 19 Apr 2023 16:42:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01CD440A79;
Wed, 19 Apr 2023 16:42:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-pj1-f48.google.com (mail-pj1-f48.google.com
[209.85.216.48]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75EEE4021F
for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 16:42:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-pj1-f48.google.com with SMTP id
h24-20020a17090a9c1800b002404be7920aso619578pjp.5
for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 19 Apr 2023 07:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=networkplumber-org.20221208.gappssmtp.com; s=20221208; t=1681915356;
x=1684507356;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to
:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date
:message-id:reply-to;
bh=QujMnk8XgqpyCe8niKBoFpYHp2WIUK7Je/Yd0CtyIHo=;
b=XOnh0cMYqCO+JdGMDvSOk5BdYbgnfWj6wi4cvl6sIHrgbI16r0zOFlCFj6RAkCN2wN
euhhtO2Re5nNsM3YwaTPONh2A9Lm0ski6X2xB4CoXFplSV5mc1ZLoaEFkfCK6xBOqCML
Q8GgujE/iVsOFarokXrR4osGMqHLx92QT0MLGCVI9ximVqGLFysEGpCiZw78uB8P4Fml
Phux1g/Q6MNl+NbSzHAGNSjxJ3TZHADavxYTjutpZsZbABA/SxyVHNZkshrcQDsd8Tvi
hcJjLk+XY+pD8EYicXfksaJ3fooxMvCl2/Mf2etrci0hkvaMB0/bZdyWPlV7+P+JI7fC
cK3g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1681915356; x=1684507356;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to
:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=QujMnk8XgqpyCe8niKBoFpYHp2WIUK7Je/Yd0CtyIHo=;
b=gmXTpG9+1uU8jJ46LKO0XtBHxga9Cg1qqwmBFetZmNl0BQ0ETQIHbBNLD478gE8ifV
/Cwpc5f5fNUXyax/AsmhmnwpSHMO95/9y3+S+puwUazspMsTwPuPLkReT8RDpENP5Q38
iwWM9UxsXURNfyKampztYRq8SJFEbToLV/UNwOpT0RwkCVN61M2LDSY84H5tcYlosQmV
Cgo37hhgCEt4psfp8UT0zxYbRqR8Feogh5xrlsxoZbOMG8UJA/0fx2VBRfhDyvKTGvI+
ATXD/FXAWUguEbFs7ZfWIr00oOr68NEWxfQe9+IfOedUmkRNCZ8FBQ2KESM0Sam5ooyb
GRyg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9fgXiQs/WCfuRaVmFPkfXp8ZZY3/sq8kinb6wkWDykt5/shud63
c+q1jtw/eFjZQi/mrHKGcHum2g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350boGaHGiBGsoQOA7GdsiTxzAwqXrUMOewmUhmTyPFWeAHRVo8U7W9sNifzaXF+X+OR2durinw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:1f20:b0:f0:2084:4cab with SMTP id
dn32-20020a056a201f2000b000f020844cabmr3282268pzb.36.1681915356612;
Wed, 19 Apr 2023 07:42:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hermes.local (204-195-120-218.wavecable.com. [204.195.120.218])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
l15-20020a62be0f000000b006259e883ee9sm11082504pff.189.2023.04.19.07.42.35
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
Wed, 19 Apr 2023 07:42:36 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 07:42:33 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Ophir Munk <ophirmu@nvidia.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>, "Devendra
Singh Rawat" <dsinghrawat@marvell.com>, Alok Prasad <palok@marvell.com>,
Ophir Munk <ophirmu@mellanox.com>, Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>, "Thomas
Monjalon" <thomas@monjalon.net>, Lior Margalit <lmargalit@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] lib: set/get max memzone segments
Message-ID: <20230419074233.75bc7f47@hermes.local>
In-Reply-To: <20230419083634.2027689-1-ophirmu@nvidia.com>
References: <20230419083634.2027689-1-ophirmu@nvidia.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
<mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
<mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
On Wed, 19 Apr 2023 11:36:34 +0300
Ophir Munk <ophirmu@nvidia.com> wrote:
> +int ecore_mz_mapping_alloc(void)
> +{
> + ecore_mz_mapping = rte_malloc("ecore_mz_map", 0,
> + rte_memzone_max_get() * sizeof(struct rte_memzone *));
Why not use rte_calloc(), and devices should be using NUMA aware
allocation to put the memzone on same NUMA node as the PCI device.