From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF4B42A02;
	Wed, 26 Apr 2023 12:29:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3A8142D61;
	Wed, 26 Apr 2023 12:28:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mga17.intel.com (mga17.intel.com [192.55.52.151])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5367742D0C;
 Wed, 26 Apr 2023 12:28:13 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;
 d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel;
 t=1682504893; x=1714040893;
 h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:
 references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=LfMEFEMLe1Y3VI0KED4PFZccOjc3DrvKx2/omWswSeQ=;
 b=UwcA/PG/Iyx1F920VbAwAoJB/NZmh2m6nBqIJI0WcfKsr8Gdet8iRiJZ
 XHhsLKsO7y9vAr0hxEsmZVbZGGpDM+6trWosA/ffmuSinDl+JMqPzQkai
 O+/BZR1nGVICjedlR9cADFkVgHT2vu+Z2Jx7YP3IoFpq3VgY8bUVg2486
 jNrDvIF+aVEvkSjMNFWzi3h8bndtPoZe7ArlYuboCPf79vDOgEKJ/7yo1
 T3IHQ9qyXzWsAvuLIRP15JVrF19NOwbyP5eDttcRkL+bPfVGZzPnI7gl/
 0H5d8l9H1COr3AQ+OzWLRHUAIqDOwHV81sD2GHNdEenI9tXSuIxWUHzeC w==;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10691"; a="327391555"
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.99,227,1677571200"; d="scan'208";a="327391555"
Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32])
 by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384;
 26 Apr 2023 03:28:12 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10691"; a="1023552739"
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.99,227,1677571200"; d="scan'208";a="1023552739"
Received: from dpdk-wenjing-01.sh.intel.com ([10.67.118.239])
 by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Apr 2023 03:28:11 -0700
From: Wenjing Qiao <wenjing.qiao@intel.com>
To: jingjing.wu@intel.com,
	beilei.xing@intel.com,
	qi.z.zhang@intel.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, mingxia.liu@intel.com, Wenjing Qiao <wenjing.qiao@intel.com>,
 stable@dpdk.org, Christopher Pau <christopher.pau@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 10/15] common/idpf/base: fix memory leaks on ctrlq functions
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2023 06:22:54 -0400
Message-Id: <20230426102259.205992-11-wenjing.qiao@intel.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1
In-Reply-To: <20230426102259.205992-1-wenjing.qiao@intel.com>
References: <20230421084043.135503-2-wenjing.qiao@intel.com>
 <20230426102259.205992-1-wenjing.qiao@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org

idpf_init_hw needs to free it's q_info.
idpf_clean_arq_element needs to return buffers via post_rx_buffs

Fixes: fb4ac04e9bfa ("common/idpf: introduce common library")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Christopher Pau <christopher.pau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wenjing Qiao <wenjing.qiao@intel.com>
---
 drivers/common/idpf/base/idpf_common.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/common/idpf/base/idpf_common.c b/drivers/common/idpf/base/idpf_common.c
index 2394f85580..da352ea88f 100644
--- a/drivers/common/idpf/base/idpf_common.c
+++ b/drivers/common/idpf/base/idpf_common.c
@@ -130,6 +130,8 @@ int idpf_init_hw(struct idpf_hw *hw, struct idpf_ctlq_size ctlq_size)
 	hw->mac.addr[4] = 0x03;
 	hw->mac.addr[5] = 0x14;
 
+	idpf_free(hw, q_info);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -219,6 +221,7 @@ bool idpf_check_asq_alive(struct idpf_hw *hw)
 int idpf_clean_arq_element(struct idpf_hw *hw,
 			   struct idpf_arq_event_info *e, u16 *pending)
 {
+	struct idpf_dma_mem *dma_mem = NULL;
 	struct idpf_ctlq_msg msg = { 0 };
 	int status;
 	u16 msg_data_len;
@@ -226,6 +229,8 @@ int idpf_clean_arq_element(struct idpf_hw *hw,
 	*pending = 1;
 
 	status = idpf_ctlq_recv(hw->arq, pending, &msg);
+	if (status == -ENOMSG)
+		goto exit;
 
 	/* ctlq_msg does not align to ctlq_desc, so copy relevant data here */
 	e->desc.opcode = msg.opcode;
@@ -240,7 +245,14 @@ int idpf_clean_arq_element(struct idpf_hw *hw,
 		msg_data_len = msg.data_len;
 		idpf_memcpy(e->msg_buf, msg.ctx.indirect.payload->va, msg_data_len,
 			    IDPF_DMA_TO_NONDMA);
+		dma_mem = msg.ctx.indirect.payload;
+	} else {
+		*pending = 0;
 	}
+
+	status = idpf_ctlq_post_rx_buffs(hw, hw->arq, pending, &dma_mem);
+
+exit:
 	return status;
 }
 
-- 
2.25.1