DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/1] devtools: add tracepoint check in checkpatch
Date: Thu, 18 May 2023 08:33:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230518083341.288fcb82@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PH0PR18MB50036FDAB8B85AA7484ADA97DD7F9@PH0PR18MB5003.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>

On Thu, 18 May 2023 13:45:29 +0000
Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com> wrote:

> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>
> >Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2023 5:35 PM
> >To: dev@dpdk.org
> >Cc: thomas@monjalon.net; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>;
> >Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>
> >Subject: [PATCH v5 1/1] devtools: add tracepoint check in checkpatch
> >
> >This patch adds a validation in checkpatch tool, to check if a tracepoint is
> >present in any new function added in cryptodev, ethdev, eventdev and
> >mempool library.
> >
> >In this patch, the build_map_changes function is copied from check-symbol-
> >change.sh to check-tracepoint.sh. The check-tracepoint.sh script uses
> >build_map_changes function to create a map of functions.
> >In the map, the newly added functions, added in the experimental section are
> >identified and their definition are checked for the presence of tracepoint. The
> >checkpatch return error if the tracepoint is not present.
> >
> >For functions for which trace is not needed, they can be added to
> >devtools/trace-skiplist.txt file. The above tracepoint check will be skipped for
> >them.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>

Given the amount of string processing, it would be more readable in python.
That is not a show stopper, just a suggestion.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-18 15:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-12  9:23 [PATCH] " Ankur Dwivedi
2022-10-12 11:45 ` [PATCH v2] " Ankur Dwivedi
2022-10-12 13:08   ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-10-12 15:16     ` [EXT] " Ankur Dwivedi
2022-10-12 16:19       ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-10-15 12:58   ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Ankur Dwivedi
2022-10-15 12:58     ` [PATCH v3 1/2] devtools: move build symbol map function Ankur Dwivedi
2022-10-15 12:58     ` [PATCH v3 2/2] devtools: add tracepoint check in checkpatch Ankur Dwivedi
2022-11-02  4:08     ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-03-03 15:58     ` [PATCH v4 " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-03-03 15:58       ` [PATCH v4 1/2] devtools: move build symbol map function Ankur Dwivedi
2023-03-03 15:58       ` [PATCH v4 2/2] devtools: add tracepoint check in checkpatch Ankur Dwivedi
2023-03-07 12:05       ` [PATCH v5 0/1] " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-03-07 12:05         ` [PATCH v5 1/1] " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-05-18 13:45           ` Ankur Dwivedi
2023-05-18 15:33             ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2023-08-21 13:53               ` [EXT] " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-08-21 14:46                 ` Morten Brørup
2023-08-30 16:23                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-08-30 18:38                     ` Morten Brørup
2023-09-01  2:32                       ` Jerin Jacob
2023-09-01  7:28                         ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-11-14 13:15                           ` Ankur Dwivedi
2023-11-28 13:18         ` [PATCH v5 0/1] " Thomas Monjalon
2023-11-28 14:07           ` [EXT] " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-11-28 15:55             ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-11-30  5:56               ` Ankur Dwivedi
2023-11-30  8:40                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-11-30 13:16                   ` Ankur Dwivedi
2023-12-15  6:43         ` [PATCH v6 0/2] " Ankur Dwivedi
2023-12-15  6:43           ` [PATCH v6 1/2] devtools: move build map changes function Ankur Dwivedi
2023-12-15  6:43           ` [PATCH v6 2/2] devtools: add tracepoint check in checkpatch Ankur Dwivedi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230518083341.288fcb82@hermes.local \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=adwivedi@marvell.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).