From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
Cc: Kamil Godzwon <kamilx.godzwon@intel.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, Fan Zhang <fanzhang.oss@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2] lib/cryptodev: fix assertion to remove GCC compilation warning
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 09:00:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230523090033.145f635b@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CO6PR18MB448402F53FD93D86F66D6EBCD8409@CO6PR18MB4484.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
On Tue, 23 May 2023 08:12:28 +0000
Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com> wrote:
> >
> > This could happen if the passed in length to this routine was larger than
> > the amount of data in the mbuf. Should the function check and return an error?
> >
> > Panic should only be reserved for seriously corrupted input (like invalid mbuf).
> >
> > Also, this is a big enough function that it really should not be inlined.
>
> This is a datapath API. RTE_ASSERT is normally not enabled in release build.
> So, this assert is not doing any check for normal scenario.
> We normally avoid these type of error checks in the datapath.
> And while building in debug mode, we need these asserts to give a backtrace also
> To debug the rootcause of the issue.
>
> I would suggest fixing the assert itself instead of adding a check.
> Current patch will affect performance.
>
> Agreed, that the function is big for being an inline function,
> but that is what all the datapath APIs are and
> we keep them inline to improve the performance.
Inline is not a magic go fast switch. Turns out that the compilers and cpu's
already do good job with functions. Using LTO helps too.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-23 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-22 18:49 [PATCH] " Kamil Godzwon
2023-05-22 19:04 ` [PATCH v2] " Kamil Godzwon
2023-05-22 21:25 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-05-23 8:12 ` [EXT] " Akhil Goyal
2023-05-23 16:00 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2023-05-24 7:21 ` Akhil Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230523090033.145f635b@hermes.local \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=fanzhang.oss@gmail.com \
--cc=gakhil@marvell.com \
--cc=kamilx.godzwon@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).