From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE3B42C4E; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 17:55:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 332F541138; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 17:55:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pl1-f180.google.com (mail-pl1-f180.google.com [209.85.214.180]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D55C140698 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 17:55:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pl1-f180.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1b3a9eae57cso13515965ad.1 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 08:55:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20221208.gappssmtp.com; s=20221208; t=1686585337; x=1689177337; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=pwVkTnpr/jgiodkADII9KAz1WnzWZlPags4ydsOUZrg=; b=x7LFhj1EBZUT/v6dHeNp3tLFmvCTwK7IQf+gYTWHuw3VUFo6h5TebFjB2BgWses6B0 G4KF/nVKQEkA9/sjkyMps9iTlG0zEV7yZzltB8hDwuX+8O1zy0Wd6KcmXRF8hfPrboNB 15jIPPPvjZeK9LUTTibHf15e2iCLfCQFdPylCS9LUyQ0GtCOYOgHmH8dhQjjPYzMBbAT ay9EXE71MBrhnO1mFAoS7/fNbJ4HQAUyeImB8IjMtYnII01EM+BMDOeiFtLV9+CLDuBF b/ix6ls4Sc5bELJfG3HQu/nXkcBzdlxrFBerMhxjn1YL4u39F+qSlmBEOk4QQgHHVm/X 9Fdg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1686585337; x=1689177337; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=pwVkTnpr/jgiodkADII9KAz1WnzWZlPags4ydsOUZrg=; b=SlrJ6uwsuPvoazqXw8l+1dAMklXFDF2j8g2dA3UM//A7btZ5sibmHIUCtryiu1oFzD RDMGxz7Cso3SdWeMu30Evu0NvMhh5pLH+r2A84H4yD5VBIx+Do1nhps5S33dsPlmacbz cFtk97hLyq+xlF05W+ZtCY+HI2/q/jIkpUXf6KwRNM2rFtnyExl1OzTmum7F4NRTNOt8 ksvUStxQyXEhRZ8h3dVegMp3spluF1wuI0Ek9kRWDwOGZDMJ3wqFH9tTErXzBdM6tYOy W+gIfyVYq025ovMTlsc7rPjKWnwoDXNtmKhTyitwqKjDA0KSb49102q43CYwtbnHmB1j DwKw== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDyX5EM7AWuC+BTXgEUS9fMf/yh/ByNxZEpSXqve5KsmzMGU4T9B zCJA+pxhzbEVAn9vFd3pY/funA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ7qbtF0P4u2h/+UuHLFQESWWm1X2oPrEjJc4OpsfgtFZ+MM8x7PIBNAQTQR4r69/3uoszYLxw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d4c4:b0:1ad:ea13:1916 with SMTP id o4-20020a170902d4c400b001adea131916mr7676468plg.21.1686585336952; Mon, 12 Jun 2023 08:55:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-120-218.wavecable.com. [204.195.120.218]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f12-20020a170902ab8c00b001aaed524541sm8422263plr.227.2023.06.12.08.55.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 12 Jun 2023 08:55:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 08:55:35 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Luca Boccassi Cc: Thomas Monjalon , Dan Gora , Mattias =?UTF-8?B?UsO2bm5ibG9t?= , dev@dpdk.org, David Marchand , Jerin Jacob , bruce.richardson@intel.com Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] eal: resolve getentropy at run time for random seed Message-ID: <20230612085535.55bddbc2@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: <21b778bfab32f7478b450129c9112a0f41cfaf69.camel@debian.org> References: <20200421195446.1730-1-dg@adax.com> <2005957.V7vgbo76UW@thomas> <21b778bfab32f7478b450129c9112a0f41cfaf69.camel@debian.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 09:33:04 +0100 Luca Boccassi wrote: > > It seems there is a communication issue in this thread. > > Some maintainers look to be against the solution, > > and you seem frustrated because of a blocked usage issue. > > > > Please could you explain what is the initial user problem? > > It seems you want to run a recent DPDK with an old glibc. Am I right? > > Building DPDK with a recent glibc and then running it with an old > glibc, to be precise. This model is not supportable. There has not been any further action on this patchset in years. And the end of the thread describes how the patch is trying to solve a problem that DPDK and glibc don't want to support. Marking it as rejected.