DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Phil Yang <phil.yang@arm.com>
Cc: aconole@redhat.com, maicolgabriel@hotmail.com, dev@dpdk.org,
	david.marchand@redhat.com, drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	gavin.hu@arm.com, Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com,
	ruifeng.wang@arm.com, nd@arm.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] test/mcslock: move performance test to perf tests
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 14:23:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230612142332.3b2ce587@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1584936978-11899-1-git-send-email-phil.yang@arm.com>

On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 12:16:17 +0800
Phil Yang <phil.yang@arm.com> wrote:

> The MCS lock performance test takes more than 10 seconds and leads
> to meson test timeout on some platforms. Move the performance test
> into perf tests.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Phil Yang <phil.yang@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
> ---

No, fix the test.
There is no reason that mcslock should be in perf section
but not all the other lock types.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-06-12 21:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-23  4:16 Phil Yang
2020-03-23  4:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] test/atomic: reduce the number of loops to avoid timeouts Phil Yang
2020-07-28  3:41   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Phil Yang
2020-09-17  9:17     ` Juraj Linkeš
2023-06-13  3:37     ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-07-23  2:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] test/mcslock: move performance test to perf tests Phil Yang
2020-07-23 15:14   ` Aaron Conole
2020-07-28  3:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Phil Yang
2020-09-17  9:16   ` Juraj Linkeš
2023-06-12 21:23 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230612142332.3b2ce587@hermes.local \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=gavin.hu@arm.com \
    --cc=maicolgabriel@hotmail.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=phil.yang@arm.com \
    --cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).