DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wathsala Vithanage <wathsala.vithanage@arm.com>
To: honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com, konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru,
	thomas@monjalon.net, ruifeng.wang@arm.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, nd@arm.com,
	Wathsala Vithanage <wathsala.vithanage@arm.com>
Subject: [RFC] ring: remove unnecessary fences in C11 ring for performance
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 19:47:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230612194716.1050379-2-wathsala.vithanage@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230612194716.1050379-1-wathsala.vithanage@arm.com>

For improved performance over the current C11 based ring
implementation, two ACQUIRE fences between the load of the old_head
and the load of the const_tail in __rte_ring_move_prod_head and the
load of old_head and load of the prod_tail in
__rte_ring_move_cons_head functions have been removed. These two
fences are not required for the safety of the ring library.

Signed-off-by: Wathsala Vithanage <wathsala.vithanage@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
---
 .mailmap                    | 1 +
 lib/ring/rte_ring_c11_pvt.h | 6 ------
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/.mailmap b/.mailmap
index 4018f0fc47..367115d134 100644
--- a/.mailmap
+++ b/.mailmap
@@ -1430,6 +1430,7 @@ Walter Heymans <walter.heymans@corigine.com>
 Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@gmail.com>
 Wangyu (Eric) <seven.wangyu@huawei.com>
 Waterman Cao <waterman.cao@intel.com>
+Wathsala Vithanage <wathsala.vithanage@arm.com>
 Weichun Chen <weichunx.chen@intel.com>
 Wei Dai <wei.dai@intel.com>
 Weifeng Li <liweifeng96@126.com>
diff --git a/lib/ring/rte_ring_c11_pvt.h b/lib/ring/rte_ring_c11_pvt.h
index f895950df4..eb59c61b6a 100644
--- a/lib/ring/rte_ring_c11_pvt.h
+++ b/lib/ring/rte_ring_c11_pvt.h
@@ -66,9 +66,6 @@ __rte_ring_move_prod_head(struct rte_ring *r, unsigned int is_sp,
 		/* Reset n to the initial burst count */
 		n = max;
 
-		/* Ensure the head is read before tail */
-		__atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
-
 		/* load-acquire synchronize with store-release of ht->tail
 		 * in update_tail.
 		 */
@@ -142,9 +139,6 @@ __rte_ring_move_cons_head(struct rte_ring *r, int is_sc,
 		/* Restore n as it may change every loop */
 		n = max;
 
-		/* Ensure the head is read before tail */
-		__atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
-
 		/* this load-acquire synchronize with store-release of ht->tail
 		 * in update_tail.
 		 */
-- 
2.25.1


      reply	other threads:[~2023-06-12 19:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-12 19:47 Wathsala Vithanage
2023-06-12 19:47 ` Wathsala Vithanage [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230612194716.1050379-2-wathsala.vithanage@arm.com \
    --to=wathsala.vithanage@arm.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).