From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C7142CBA; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 23:57:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5257240FAE; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 23:57:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pf1-f169.google.com (mail-pf1-f169.google.com [209.85.210.169]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5555140DDB for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 23:57:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pf1-f169.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-6666d5f9803so121361b3a.0 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 14:57:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20221208.gappssmtp.com; s=20221208; t=1686779859; x=1689371859; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=gRIERT3Tuagl2D9oZYjAX6mccNbWxVhDdSUAr2hfFq8=; b=BkPai6mgFbcGv+UNRKiWUXqVmp/j9ckj5FQi0pOeWzQ1B5HMv4UjKiz0SggLR549/5 0zmlHvC/4nbtsmrhrr7OloO8vo8peWO0kE/l0jVHom+qv9Fzf8lU2QX/Mg22ezpRfmv0 rFIuaNmM22Qg03y2CkvUpyUk+MaUToxU+3WV53/tHFOC72u7sAMeBMf1S++jPcErySUn O8RXeKUULBYVC3GKk1bpkiiz+BfVA0nXMv9M1MZckHeG0saxClfT4Pk5mtl76nT7/tko 1N4yjjlLi2WlBTxXEEiRBV9K3QYC+JSIJcRwA5cyKer4qJFBCwq1HfBqWWuIuSaoPOSZ wehQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1686779859; x=1689371859; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gRIERT3Tuagl2D9oZYjAX6mccNbWxVhDdSUAr2hfFq8=; b=P4pAZKru9Qw+jhqe8babMH6O75inFAiCCVhpYgUXCorF4EbvOROOl/Al2rrLG1WOEj Qo+ARms7ZJkh1LiJ2UMY6BNqDxbP/ZMxn3tCMZ7JPz11qE5pD/vvsmR7aGkZlaKFxlwf czBu9uc9u6GXkoDg/CgmqlV+fyTsiaxWwWAYz4kqK9CZ/+KCK13hdEElH/6eCmhLFEyH gDrPjkKsv94Z84j2zw0ciHu8cFVOptcJ9xRtd+SHDzwIlVZNg7ofZ8K2PGKwl2WVnkzq 3j+fUTiy/5Wn11bCMJiy0DPysoxuThh7hGBjXDFNxRjuy1WYIhylwmuJmDID7IqGoIbk N1QQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDzKRVBR2y1+g3iF9GpK4URSqZWuh92zLNR5hM4so5vBOfqOAVp0 txl+wzdtc/ELABsBzW7MDEKIwA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5xl1M7RClJ0XEVOY7kAC0pcNi/aOUblzyizqaB+VpyouR6pYeR1yQiBzVr/rnGEXJ04P0FRw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:7347:b0:10b:bf2d:71bb with SMTP id v7-20020a056a20734700b0010bbf2d71bbmr4023141pzc.27.1686779859271; Wed, 14 Jun 2023 14:57:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-120-218.wavecable.com. [204.195.120.218]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j10-20020aa783ca000000b0064aea45b040sm3204869pfn.168.2023.06.14.14.57.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 14 Jun 2023 14:57:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 14:57:37 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: Olivier Matz , dev@dpdk.org, Haiyue Wang , Bing Zhao Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] net: make eCPRI header host network order Message-ID: <20230614145737.753174d3@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: <20201127190920.3312280-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> References: <20201127190920.3312280-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 19:09:20 +0000 Ferruh Yigit wrote: > Other protocol structs are in the host byte order, having eCPRI in > network byte order is insistent and error prone. > > Making eCPRI protocol header host byte order. > > Signed-off-by: Haiyue Wang > Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit The discussion around this never concluded and there was no followon patch. Marking it as "Changes Requested". The most common thing for the existing headers is to declare them to be in network byte order.