From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABB6D42E3C; Mon, 10 Jul 2023 18:45:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 370E840698; Mon, 10 Jul 2023 18:45:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-oa1-f45.google.com (mail-oa1-f45.google.com [209.85.160.45]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E37E440150 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2023 18:45:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-oa1-f45.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-1b059dd7c0cso4400660fac.0 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2023 09:45:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20221208.gappssmtp.com; s=20221208; t=1689007507; x=1691599507; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=ADrzODCGRzyxqld2N94ouJPROFFZGdX66Y07WbSjdh4=; b=adVU8Uu8W8TrdTQUk1/FXnqYyN0Wbf1jBCMepG5x2kdq+uyyjjrZoIVxl+P037vqY5 6wPPOmGFC4Tb/LOakY4x10lJfnz1jQ+qxipKG4wurjGm2ozexuRuWiprsLCz7uuQa38H wzKiCUw6o7954cX/icYb4Mryc0WubTYLfUJbMmlKu4CIvPqabq2bX6cGjXP8d0OdtR6/ PgCNwxblxZGm18lLeLVBNOy6hnVGKNYeJoxAxMZAwW3OgcDGbotdpIUiWGC1P7jU4Xej zE3XDXq2qkNMws8LrO4UqYcULGnyQXDEJTLauV6zi9/UN86dl1/wFHdajGx+jAaYef1Q m/Fw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1689007507; x=1691599507; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ADrzODCGRzyxqld2N94ouJPROFFZGdX66Y07WbSjdh4=; b=KW1pzQ4nmWsOUgvLG/xxp2vfpKAyfOjFhKZ8ba2eou5X96CTMq6AqZOcYzO5dZTYzJ VIe+UmRwtJ5yAc7tJOhTCfz+dZU8hrTo+hBtBl6EyAWVxzfyDZ6oCOHay2cT+v0kWv3J FRYT7bgQvAFVpzbB9Vf7Roz8fmcCsuFCdyCKsc+XWFjVnJUgvgrUtbRASQHPvZIPGqOV a4BhFsNcKTXU0FP+L/bmo/JNj/G2aMOs/QRqh+Bdiozrqz/Awbtzg1bXKwCCYI6d/Zs8 W+D+A7+8wA4CpVXG6WijpwLXQvotZtBsNP4+uBoL7Q7o8Qrr1LVweDR0z9+43BPYgBW7 F36g== X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLbTYTVNIsulYHNWGWpGsofUBULJdFMsdI/bzlKP3ST3JhWBVCOp t+sskrKGbnPu8KKRdYyTaU9Fcw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlEI5ZlC76uW5RuCkou9ZkiR+rCTQ2eKPlHl1ZKywJvFYvEy0Rp3ZQazTFD9Ua8isEBYliaWIw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:638d:b0:1b0:291c:9272 with SMTP id t13-20020a056870638d00b001b0291c9272mr16084766oap.28.1689007507195; Mon, 10 Jul 2023 09:45:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-120-218.wavecable.com. [204.195.120.218]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 8-20020a17090a08c800b00263e4dc33aasm6413812pjn.11.2023.07.10.09.45.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 10 Jul 2023 09:45:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 09:45:05 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: ido g Cc: Ferruh Yigit , dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/pcap: support MTU set Message-ID: <20230710094505.53b699ef@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: <20220317174347.110909-1-ido@cgstowernetworks.com> References: <20220317174347.110909-1-ido@cgstowernetworks.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 19:43:47 +0200 ido g wrote: > Support rte_eth_dev_set_mtu by pcap vdevs > Enforce mtu on rx/tx > For more details see https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=961 > > Signed-off-by: ido g Feeling less convinced that this is needed. The motivation appears to be to test with an underlying Linux device. If so, then why not use af_packet or tap devices which already should handle MTU?