From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 758FF42F4B;
Wed, 26 Jul 2023 07:55:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 047C240E25;
Wed, 26 Jul 2023 07:55:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mx0b-0016f401.pphosted.com (mx0b-0016f401.pphosted.com
[67.231.156.173])
by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 012D540A79
for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 26 Jul 2023 07:55:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0045851.ppops.net [127.0.0.1])
by mx0b-0016f401.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id
36Q3WgZp024292; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 22:55:14 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=marvell.com;
h=from : to : cc :
subject : date : message-id : in-reply-to : references : mime-version :
content-transfer-encoding : content-type; s=pfpt0220;
bh=ZNTW6OLNjWKbOKjfADBLWp6P6mJ0n8cF78j7PjzVtzM=;
b=F8iJZGn3NPD63fqOKkA2pBTuITpjsL87opb3gakSpL/1OWoDLUvhLbDV+9x0vLVjPV1G
3F9L+QHw7DCvalOiph7j5pZzY8EQHjgdDwJkHqLp1SheNkURME3iEjU3Tciq+8QtdgpL
1jNF+AWKEQJTCgR/s7yJ2rTxacnKYvt9TFuju0ghscYP+egUMBg/M0Yai/Oe49Mc4F2+
tM5C494E8G6xN76YtcijHAwk05GxfcuDU79gvQqyocv2iTPoEVI3isg56RQZAB73tUyR
DleA5BZ8DzZeAwg5WKzsXH+5V1p1jZ0G9lQ0lhoVaV9oz9sYYHZQzHjQp3POj6SZ4v8B DA==
Received: from dc5-exch02.marvell.com ([199.233.59.182])
by mx0b-0016f401.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3s18r292up-1
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT);
Tue, 25 Jul 2023 22:55:14 -0700
Received: from DC5-EXCH02.marvell.com (10.69.176.39) by DC5-EXCH02.marvell.com
(10.69.176.39) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.48;
Tue, 25 Jul 2023 22:55:12 -0700
Received: from maili.marvell.com (10.69.176.80) by DC5-EXCH02.marvell.com
(10.69.176.39) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1497.48 via Frontend
Transport; Tue, 25 Jul 2023 22:55:12 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [10.28.36.154])
by maili.marvell.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6104F3F7075;
Tue, 25 Jul 2023 22:55:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Rakesh Kudurumalla <rkudurumalla@marvell.com>
To: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
CC: <dev@dpdk.org>, <jerinj@marvell.com>, <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>, "Rakesh
Kudurumalla" <rkudurumalla@marvell.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] app/test: resolve mbuf_test application failure
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 11:25:07 +0530
Message-ID: <20230726055507.1183617-1-rkudurumalla@marvell.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1
In-Reply-To: <20230426092750.2423850-1-rkudurumalla@marvell.com>
References: <20230426092750.2423850-1-rkudurumalla@marvell.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Proofpoint-GUID: eGdefjk4LGFgHvMaQy3zra9tbPviK47_
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: eGdefjk4LGFgHvMaQy3zra9tbPviK47_
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard
engine=ICAP:2.0.254,Aquarius:18.0.957,Hydra:6.0.591,FMLib:17.11.176.26
definitions=2023-07-25_14,2023-07-25_01,2023-05-22_02
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
<mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
<mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
when RTE_ENABLE_ASSERT is defined test_mbuf application is
failing because we are trying to attach extbuf to a cloned
buffer to which external mbuf is already attached.To make
test_mbuf pass CI we have updated ol_flags. This patch fixes
the same.
Signed-off-by: Rakesh Kudurumalla <rkudurumalla@marvell.com>
---
v2 : Addressed comments by removing extbuf call
as mbuf is already attached
app/test/test_mbuf.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/app/test/test_mbuf.c b/app/test/test_mbuf.c
index efac01806b..722e1ef624 100644
--- a/app/test/test_mbuf.c
+++ b/app/test/test_mbuf.c
@@ -2345,16 +2345,13 @@ test_pktmbuf_ext_shinfo_init_helper(struct rte_mempool *pktmbuf_pool)
GOTO_FAIL("%s: External buffer is not attached to mbuf\n",
__func__);
- /* allocate one more mbuf */
+ /* allocate one more mbuf, it is attached to the same external buffer */
clone = rte_pktmbuf_clone(m, pktmbuf_pool);
if (clone == NULL)
GOTO_FAIL("%s: mbuf clone allocation failed!\n", __func__);
if (rte_pktmbuf_pkt_len(clone) != 0)
GOTO_FAIL("%s: Bad packet length\n", __func__);
- /* attach the same external buffer to the cloned mbuf */
- rte_pktmbuf_attach_extbuf(clone, ext_buf_addr, buf_iova, buf_len,
- ret_shinfo);
if (clone->ol_flags != RTE_MBUF_F_EXTERNAL)
GOTO_FAIL("%s: External buffer is not attached to mbuf\n",
__func__);
--
2.25.1