From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3511742F9B;
	Tue,  1 Aug 2023 18:20:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25BC840F16;
	Tue,  1 Aug 2023 18:20:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from linux.microsoft.com (linux.microsoft.com [13.77.154.182])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D2C240A89
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue,  1 Aug 2023 18:20:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1086)
 id E788B238AE90; Tue,  1 Aug 2023 09:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com E788B238AE90
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com;
 s=default; t=1690906846;
 bh=oNzXzGzJyNfDxtKB7/YmoA+eLeRfg0WIXRe9Khrm6Kk=;
 h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From;
 b=J1Wq9C5vfU4Su0pFAytWh/kUQFJUTaMpHk3wWFes9TPDDfu/aL5sxNCH9pHhrk7Ks
 I+cPf3qqy6j96k1TqIDiGsZaA65PAFhYbhdd559KdhfzaP4dhb7YQx25qZFhBv9wrC
 S61f+I/SK+jJXjT8KvzVMWiogUfeOorQLIzX4oX8=
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 09:20:46 -0700
From: Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: Ali Alnubani <alialnu@nvidia.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
 Morten =?iso-8859-1?Q?Br=F8rup?= <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] build: update DPDK to use C11 standard
Message-ID: <20230801162046.GA23300@linuxonhyperv3.guj3yctzbm1etfxqx2vob5hsef.xx.internal.cloudapp.net>
References: <20230731103858.1491751-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com>
 <20230801131549.323733-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com>
 <CH0PR12MB51564CF362670EE8291E7618DA0AA@CH0PR12MB5156.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
 <ZMkp1XzE83Cgyf9i@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <ZMkp1XzE83Cgyf9i@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org

On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 04:50:45PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 03:47:03PM +0000, Ali Alnubani wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 1, 2023 4:16 PM
> > > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > > Cc: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; Morten Brørup
> > > <mb@smartsharesystems.com>; Tyler Retzlaff
> > > <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
> > > Subject: [PATCH v4] build: update DPDK to use C11 standard
> > > 
> > > As previously announced, DPDK 23.11 will require a C11 supporting
> > > compiler and will use the C11 standard in all builds.
> > > 
> > > Forcing use of the C standard, rather than the standard with
> > > GNU extensions, means that some posix definitions which are not in
> > > the C standard are unavailable by default. We fix this by ensuring
> > > the correct defines or cflags are passed to the components that
> > > need them.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> > > Acked-by: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
> > > Acked-by: Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
> > > ---
> > 
> > By the way, I also see this build failure in RHEL 7:
> > 
> It's my understanding that we no longer support the default compilers in
> RHEL 7, since gcc 4.8.5 doesn't support the necessary c11 standard atomics.

yes, support is being dropped for RHEL 7

http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2023-February/263516.html

it seems like now that we are in 23.11 merge window the CI pipelines for
the unsupported targets can be decomissioned?

> 
> /Bruce