From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0D9A4302B; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 17:48:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85228410FD; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 17:48:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pf1-f169.google.com (mail-pf1-f169.google.com [209.85.210.169]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1420540691 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 17:47:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pf1-f169.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-686d8c8fc65so795750b3a.0 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 08:47:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20221208.gappssmtp.com; s=20221208; t=1691682478; x=1692287278; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=j9ntGDfaz3GH3tEcxMchNxCTrybU2qdwXnFgCE4o3pk=; b=des9RZttuDRXT7ZJaQClGFvga/oa0Nwt6Zt7bU6IQTSzbfbI+GNx4n9qfIj+zXT0Hs xIXzP7y1c6dcqeMjqKzrMiLnttF+qEi2AGq4EUgyGy48uQZOtI3CGm5pl9Msm92lNmhe i1FkyIEQwO8D+9po1D4V//4lHgWbI6C/6XQNYEOGB9cXB7LdiEBEyjwvAclw6OT9Q9C/ xtrNTCR7WdaaCF35xjs4S+LfK3lp1XlRv2gr7lxsTR8a/iRW9JJTAyzUY1mB5EnlX+Ht mAUENqxo+GqSv81LRVTcOf0ph9kxvC4c++8EX1Px+xzb0PlIp/IOkKAdBB4OhgC7xt5h XLWA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1691682478; x=1692287278; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=j9ntGDfaz3GH3tEcxMchNxCTrybU2qdwXnFgCE4o3pk=; b=RMAol6PBNzRmwoDG2E1G5xFWRLQGBEJRQadYb5CRDakFwNJaxZA1XKtWAVHfwbvzpx zRZS/ySTqiemC4q0rBMRGq5o1b7Saq+zXTpsHUjERsTVZWtieGe4sTEVmE+4lQVvvP0w qEJDTdcT7IthXvlclDF9LGMYACXJqEC/E8sVWwNz9lgHn8qOtSPpCx9dtgYS+kB7ug3d KSirKf/8aD//ocgghRNYYrSe8JwAMO/QGXFTx0gmakKgLRjKpjMHFxqbkNoYgvAXfZNw w4TyW8qQPJpHiP5FQccg8Ltlj6aRaV0WTuJck89ZyVzQl+13JVxBHjIXhW72VRk5gAPn YOwQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw6kZ3r/vencsG6c36yoLFa5obY3Dt/UrlXmHlFHGtm23lmGcD7 5XorlUMOGq85L9Vhz7v9ylFmjA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFAG2GlAjiRd4TiCo8qFHO2zlpm3e0OwWNGbvkUH4BQb/JA4uJxqHz11/hsw76PU5ZLpEaXZA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:9151:b0:140:253b:b658 with SMTP id x17-20020a056a20915100b00140253bb658mr2765897pzc.57.1691682478135; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 08:47:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-127-207.wavecable.com. [204.195.127.207]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s10-20020a639e0a000000b005633311c70dsm622761pgd.32.2023.08.10.08.47.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 10 Aug 2023 08:47:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 08:47:55 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Dmitry Kozlyuk Cc: Ferruh Yigit , =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgg==?= Krawczyk , William Tu , dpdk-dev , Igor Chauskin , Evgeny Schemeilin , Shai Brandes , Marcin Wojtas , Narcisa Ana Maria Vasile , Dmitry Malloy , Pallavi Kadam Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC] net/ena: Add Windows support. Message-ID: <20230810084755.2ac50b8a@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: <20230323171955.06c8fc24@sovereign> References: <20210814033609.58553-1-u9012063@gmail.com> <20210814143108.128803ef@sovereign> <27840df9-93b2-4385-ef81-aa63222510d0@amd.com> <17086af4-ae61-b042-26c3-cb979255d08d@amd.com> <20230323171955.06c8fc24@sovereign> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Thu, 23 Mar 2023 17:19:55 +0300 Dmitry Kozlyuk wrote: > > >> This is a very old thread, but still in the patchwork, I wonder if is > > >> there any update on the issue? > > > > > > Hi Ferruh, > > > > > > sorry for the late reply - nothing new from my side. > > > > > > I'm not sure what's the current state of the netuio interrupt support > > > for the Windows, but if it still didn't land, then the original issue > > > still persists. > > > > > > > Hi William, Dmitry, > > > > Is there any update on the netuio interrupt support? > > What is the plan for this patch? > > Hi Ferruh, > > The work on the interrupt support has been abandoned unfortunately. > I'd like to complete it one day, but can't make a commitment right now. > > Ref: > http://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20211012011107.431188-1-dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com/ Marking this patch as "Awaiting upstream" since it depends on interrupt support in Windows which is not available.