From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9AAC42663; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 18:04:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF3440273; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 18:04:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pf1-f181.google.com (mail-pf1-f181.google.com [209.85.210.181]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3CAA4021E for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 18:04:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pf1-f181.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-691c05bc5aaso11530221b3a.2 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 09:04:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1695917070; x=1696521870; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=+KpAh/iYXNiDGJ/t+KnnJ9K12fiGtjlapDGByPdKbY8=; b=jFiLqSxVAPFozyeQefI+0zbeYvclsLF/0qZyn466lPTlgvJSZ8/1zfh1s1mNojFUVm NwP/+KFS+ZbC3NhwNxIUWw+a7btCAVfRUTsQkiz4QR8b94NumNVg+TDFDabNLn+zI0oY 2gGJoJk2g+znANlWZbaRSjc2M0o565UHWPUV8oZ8yYjC5lNKNUnVNz8z/ToaYvKOogzN oy2LFrnxKc/iODD3xIV/8K6ghDNjJa+EB5/L8giPsjATP1PA0zC4/Iwkhysf8P5HBBwu 9x+mZNEbmfGcYMNehtvLOiw4yAZjVSyGcygA49GflhQPz97SB3ppOsI5iOKLxil+U2k+ oUFw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1695917070; x=1696521870; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=+KpAh/iYXNiDGJ/t+KnnJ9K12fiGtjlapDGByPdKbY8=; b=HT6mpCaDBagkRWvwP6ViMoahBhIY4jZ7FAgtp2P9gJMK0m5MIhY+kiA7gWzkQGUzmj kwX3N3EwTh7Ql9FlUiMwz/QCwVOa6Bla0yrB7reb9pjXVW1PNbH9/yEpmWczYT7nXFzy CDk89QRoAyoC/Zf+m74R1AqeEcPhHJtsnuJYw7bJMaYG5/vvvPgaNCMmKVxqv9YyCMWU cJmTWLLtFaAXth2x+Qjg0yyUkhYU7xdmyRPaq4lJx+8CiiKrX9oo4Y5EhyfYLn+2c8Z9 HTapkgjzczkVkMpkvVpQlBNT04VHWcZYM53Gaqs+yQuLuCxgK34LOJoh1ByD8FNhS4P8 k/4g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzyjwTrdvklUyYqig8/pEtz1K1pRPy2XPEWteQA9l2REwn7qiPV jzyvyFAYyeOJoh8rMQ+ltlrmpg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFWmMpR5pTV3N6p0j8F2JUbLsyCYuTBDnreE83zAHxbXQ/uBRUjDvAwj8aNpZwqq9J5SQyBAA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:982:b0:690:38b6:b2db with SMTP id u2-20020a056a00098200b0069038b6b2dbmr1745623pfg.6.1695917069942; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 09:04:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-112-131.wavecable.com. [204.195.112.131]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m16-20020aa79010000000b0068fece22469sm13600408pfo.4.2023.09.28.09.04.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 28 Sep 2023 09:04:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 09:04:27 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: yuying.zhang@intel.com Cc: dev@dpdk.org, qi.z.zhang@intel.com, jingjing.wu@intel.com, beilei.xing@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/9] add rte flow support for cpfl Message-ID: <20230928090427.28f2ca73@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: <20230928084458.2333663-1-yuying.zhang@intel.com> References: <20230927125416.2308974-1-yuying.zhang@intel.com> <20230928084458.2333663-1-yuying.zhang@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Thu, 28 Sep 2023 08:44:49 +0000 yuying.zhang@intel.com wrote: > From: Yuying Zhang > > This patchset add rte flow support for cpfl driver. > It depends on the following patch set: > http://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/cover/20230912173039.1612287-1-beilei.xing@intel.com/ > > Wenjing Qiao (2): > net/cpfl: add json parser for rte flow pattern rules > net/cpfl: build action mapping rules from JSON > > Yuying Zhang (7): > net/cpfl: set up rte flow skeleton > net/cpfl: set up control path > net/cpfl: add FXP low level implementation > net/cpfl: add fxp rule module > net/cpfl: add fxp flow engine > net/cpfl: add flow support for representor > net/cpfl: add support of to represented port action Are there new test cases needed for this or would it get covered by regular rte_flow tests. We really need more of a test suite for rte_flow, but it is difficult because there is so much variation between NIC's.