From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1939426B7;
Wed, 4 Oct 2023 19:13:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30565402B3;
Wed, 4 Oct 2023 19:13:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-pl1-f169.google.com (mail-pl1-f169.google.com
[209.85.214.169])
by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64BDF402A9
for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 4 Oct 2023 19:13:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-pl1-f169.google.com with SMTP id
d9443c01a7336-1c5cd27b1acso18204905ad.2
for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 04 Oct 2023 10:13:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1696439607;
x=1697044407; darn=dpdk.org;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to
:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date
:message-id:reply-to;
bh=fI+HH3RwWyseKtwkjVLbeOOt7WrorTj2ACk0wCb+6v4=;
b=X246iG8OAZQ7130pEsOV11m/S9LFzY08LD2IeXTU/W1iX6mRQaRqHgxT39VTtPujI1
pZG0r/x6PHN18bLcQt06ATwd/O/IPSXpRn/+2B/hJ6FNEyyOzDBHlCsBTQ4QALpZwlAF
dpCboGva/Gmg/riNx4UsRC2y5RWB5GcuOUYJiaquOKJWtWEht+lkyQA9rM1L3Tlm932o
qf3Qw7tQlOrNDGe3oOrVWy76uFyl3VdX4arKd3I4fGlJgXcJ9WvdrRBKE/b8vGE6XRcH
an2kgK0nQ5dao0yOvsGujP5XwLOOR7GZJbEot6wXzCDP8amhRcdtEk/1yCGiqdg68oPh
JdRg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1696439607; x=1697044407;
h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to
:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
bh=fI+HH3RwWyseKtwkjVLbeOOt7WrorTj2ACk0wCb+6v4=;
b=NyiOdhfny9x3P6Yoo91/PXjg2Fk39m1l2cydnbsoOAQGWXyZ9IOjSXCZBfSMPunLwb
2d2avP4SRZjkZLO/J4oBAFiZWdy8G54WfBYlwXYBFwvpTo8fIpAgkWiLChVhk+8TgujC
Q5T96lZpUgnlm3Kd83l60XCcBVINTVvCPVnmoP/lQH5xBuYSdBFwAu/75eEJpZ1v/crh
HhZ03+/mDczpLYI3ir6UDudsHd+ln8pEx3jhwLo8PoLdLR9UMAtaxxiucQ4F187XfqP0
koXneaTMBwzM2BcA3lI2F1eHikudXjH8odTIivmdxSzli7ReNL5XWueEigFZdN4GPf6z
7x/A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzSmuGuhvvMek6bCOXc5vNXC1mciAu6o9ZujTFx09vF1tGzB9XK
+oUpheXadpLjAdPHgl1grdlbUQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGtf1+1HEfjIH82lmzndxqgt6uxBCbqyw4v9MStSsiIBpaACbApgeHkG4apV7ocHMXvemfA3w==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ecc2:b0:1c6:1861:70a with SMTP id
a2-20020a170902ecc200b001c61861070amr3332760plh.23.1696439607293;
Wed, 04 Oct 2023 10:13:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hermes.local (204-195-126-68.wavecable.com. [204.195.126.68])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
u6-20020a170902e80600b001c55e13bf39sm3959142plg.275.2023.10.04.10.13.26
(version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
Wed, 04 Oct 2023 10:13:27 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 10:13:25 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Reshma Pattan <reshma.pattan@intel.com>, Quentin Armitage
<quentin@armitage.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] pcapng: move timestamp calculation into pdump
Message-ID: <20231004101325.5a7eefbe@hermes.local>
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8wpSjJY1Hvb0q=q9fnQ+cAe7OjHMzLAgeo2yj83qjEF=A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20230921042349.104150-1-stephen@networkplumber.org>
<20230921042349.104150-5-stephen@networkplumber.org>
<CAJFAV8wpSjJY1Hvb0q=q9fnQ+cAe7OjHMzLAgeo2yj83qjEF=A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
<mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
<mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
On Mon, 2 Oct 2023 10:15:25 +0200
David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
>
> Bugzilla ID: 1291 ?
>
> This patch (and patch 3) updates some pcapng API, is it worth a RN update?
>
> > Fixes: c882eb544842 ("pcapng: fix timestamp wrapping in output files")
>
> Is it worth backporting?
> I would say no, as some API update was needed to fix the issue.
> But on the other hand, this is an experimental API, so I prefer to ask.
>
>
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Good question.
Is experimental API allowed to change in a stable release?