From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6E26433E5; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 18:16:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3B6F402E8; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 18:16:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-pl1-f172.google.com (mail-pl1-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F788402A3 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 18:16:33 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pl1-f172.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1cfc9c4acb6so9929965ad.0 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 09:16:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1701105392; x=1701710192; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=ufNyu19Qgeb4a4GILpVRT1qp67Ryg78q4cM3FxvSSGI=; b=M0wplNYztdl+GuAMZf90ZbasRLdWIwZYzvHU7kxQFbUB2enUhM6RdklzZhW5Q3arMw xBDjPwT5CrVzdChHzLUxb0VDwANyXungWw+Mee2MCj+NVtSMNvu1BwCyG4lx6uJkYlm0 O6EfRGAm9K7O2B2Fwcb96agAr9nRuEVg+wW6veg2UWWlaH5DHu1hMq1uytr6U5azY1Ob MZuno+SUSDr+3//UYDOV2WA4e2VxJ8isdnX5Lwg9rtKzqDU+S0zTh80X1/B3gYiKH4Sf znuI2MHKJZL36owLDKp9fufc6D1FfjQvRk1+uDTPV9UYrQK6EHjXTK7ZHTJ8zgjBnNBM XcHg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1701105392; x=1701710192; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ufNyu19Qgeb4a4GILpVRT1qp67Ryg78q4cM3FxvSSGI=; b=Y0CtCtXI1l68OiQouNbgIc1km5Rw6bJzt1aAVSz1yqrTo+gv4ix/nyr9XTfo0owh23 +cERxZ4vEBwhaKw0pqFzpYaD7SKC0EMN1v8elfF7vzH92I3CJoTLjlGAF+qkcUQ63qLr 7gN0x09O3z5JLSOv8sWvkuYU2gff7jwonDKeBP9lZ1F+1ERwApMwJmBu6/RhXZeN0+Sv vCVGg1kqFOSeR43Lqyjn83DlAkRfbnLkIi1l/DD5GuuQcfA1uSXVYx55Ynk3m2j4uxSv gFKxdFFZqHyJQJZRM1OS4/zsi27UDsg4ca+XufKy0R5SR/laTbFUC16e98Gsr4DVK4tl IWhA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwYE0SFMl9AYnxsTSr9o3G8tkUjg8w8DdZ4pXBycXRQiYExaTzK 6CXHc89d4hiUolSjCTifWmdONQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHmY2+PZzwSTbJHfnIG7FwRXRtopq2/garmB53eAqsmcoIGaE6RTwPBb/np6KpEg33L/Ou9Tw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:db11:b0:1cc:5833:cf5e with SMTP id m17-20020a170902db1100b001cc5833cf5emr13872575plx.27.1701105392126; Mon, 27 Nov 2023 09:16:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-123-141.wavecable.com. [204.195.123.141]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n2-20020a170902d2c200b001cfcf432de2sm2058521plc.16.2023.11.27.09.16.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 27 Nov 2023 09:16:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 09:16:30 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> Cc: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>, Ruifeng Wang <Ruifeng.Wang@arm.com>, "Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, "Marchand, David" <david.marchand@redhat.com>, nd@arm.com Subject: Re: DPDK Release Status Meeting 2023-11-23 Message-ID: <20231127091630.2b83425c@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: <5519528.NG923GbCHz@thomas> References: <PH8PR11MB6804D5FD084BFED316132CC7FCB8A@PH8PR11MB6804.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAMw=ZnRmEuygVtcy+TJ_vwJt_5ZT8wNUJmF2u1bapAy6d_294w@mail.gmail.com> <2542e606-b66c-4dfb-b363-b885b9e3bfa2@arm.com> <5519528.NG923GbCHz@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 11:13:16 +0100 Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote: > ish. > > >> > > >> Due to a relative bigger RTE_MAX_LCORE value on ARM, the unit test case > > >> would take a longer time to finish iterations. > > >> In one of my run, the case took about 100s. > > > > > > Right, but this test is part of the "fast suite", and more than a > > > minute is not exactly fast. So one of the following should ideally > > > happen: > > > > Agree. > > > > > 1) Test is moved out of the fast suite > > > 2) Test has its individual timeout sized appropriately so that it > > > never fails regardless of the environment > > > 3) Test is capped so that it doesn't grow with the number of cores > > > without limits > > > > I'm for option 3. The case should be kept in fast suite. Time taken > > should be capped. > > More than 1 second is a bit slow. > Please make the test really faster. What is the test trying to exercise? Can it be done in another way?