From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E102D4369E; Thu, 7 Dec 2023 23:41:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDDC042EF8; Thu, 7 Dec 2023 23:41:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-pl1-f173.google.com (mail-pl1-f173.google.com [209.85.214.173]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F1314027A for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 7 Dec 2023 23:41:50 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pl1-f173.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1d045097b4cso11490605ad.0 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 07 Dec 2023 14:41:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1701988909; x=1702593709; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=UKtKBrraPPnk/T3pIW+grU1Ar7cII0aAE/7eI3AjQjo=; b=TZmNPTnvd+4W/ZqKetNVftvdOe7SPvvkpPoBb+99zKDhKtoRx0stsTnfui/ZbTxV0e +DXlmpLK+0NGAAOIyHDFANIPZDyYQSK1wWG3IV8sNb4WGmajxYev+bZW9kWUO+lsV9zF aBJZ0bnGnhUUZPIgS+qeIUqKkKE2ZJDA93rVBbevFsgdiDHjicJAM1UnnLZtKZ72J6V8 NEt9elFSZBH9089ZG953YW2UGr86ryAEbSAs1v7j+pb0uavCDrE9tZTLAWOuJgSAQRqh Hai9foFypooLpNyD6sYfFG+kZ/pt4J1Uo1fK6A4c9BvZlAye/qSRvDZi3+vGIQr6buca mJBA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1701988909; x=1702593709; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=UKtKBrraPPnk/T3pIW+grU1Ar7cII0aAE/7eI3AjQjo=; b=uh8f2bJD2CIKi4kPXMhd91rQWN/rrVWG+I8a1uWL3urcJhY9mhUDo9IXUhFKokEpMy Pwemilsp3Oz3q47jqOrrrErbSNCoT45W6th0f3YFuc6Orb+MuHh+K2M01dSx87oqVuZM JmPae+S8RBKLckzMnkhocrU53SulyjwjEC2o6r6LB3/to4pcR1+GrUvkIaQ4qBts6v6N KjUesFdhwjD2MpLyTSbsq+CVodJpfo4yz7HFVCtC8ca5puQQOmKYNFnYzPniKtyXVrxS qVMzKDJkI9WvTHerz7q+N2jJyjPRZVXPXwSlBWUyI3SLY1+B2URMMHmkIxV2AeCy4psE 8XYw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy5RpLGsmEGtFlL+KwMB6WoTLFoHZF1cWsOPKYDx9G/7wmqED6n 5lonZPOrbzxBmkSx/8ANIEzJjQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGDPcpmnhPD0SZT+a3i6jAUVbmY1OOwnFp5k4desGD+bd3S9MS0JABywSt29Aj3GDYHBRanLQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d50c:b0:1d0:9a6b:52ab with SMTP id b12-20020a170902d50c00b001d09a6b52abmr3823488plg.45.1701988909563; Thu, 07 Dec 2023 14:41:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-123-141.wavecable.com. [204.195.123.141]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d14-20020a170902cece00b001cfb6a7e41bsm320175plg.151.2023.12.07.14.41.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 07 Dec 2023 14:41:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2023 14:41:48 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> To: Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com> Cc: thomas@monjalon.net, ruifeng.wang@arm.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org, nd@arm.com, Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] config/arm: use common cpu arch for cross files Message-ID: <20231207144148.3f2aa8df@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: <20231205035259.3516625-3-joyce.kong@arm.com> References: <20230822074743.3243015-1-joyce.kong@arm.com> <20231205035259.3516625-1-joyce.kong@arm.com> <20231205035259.3516625-3-joyce.kong@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 03:52:59 +0000 Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com> wrote: > The cpu info in some cross files is inconsistent with > that in SoC flags. The mismatch doesn't cause any issue > because the cpu field in the cross file takes no effect > and machine_args in config/arm/meson.build actually works. > Use a common one in cross files to remove any confusion. > > Reported-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> > Signed-off-by: Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com> > Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com> Good to see consolidation instead of copy/paste. Acked-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>