From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: ktraynor@redhat.com, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>,
Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
Subject: [PATCH] ethdev: recommend against using locks in event callbacks
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2024 09:43:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240201084319.2687896-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> (raw)
As described in a recent bugzilla opened against the net/iavf driver,
a driver may call a event callback from other calls of the ethdev API.
Nothing guarantees in the ethdev API against such behavior.
Add a notice against using locks in those callbacks.
Bugzilla ID: 1337
Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
---
lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h | 14 +++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
index 21e3a21903..5c6b104fb4 100644
--- a/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
+++ b/lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h
@@ -4090,7 +4090,19 @@ enum rte_eth_event_type {
RTE_ETH_EVENT_MAX /**< max value of this enum */
};
-/** User application callback to be registered for interrupts. */
+/**
+ * User application callback to be registered for interrupts.
+ *
+ * Note: there is no guarantee in the DPDK drivers that a callback won't be
+ * called in the middle of other parts of the ethdev API. For example,
+ * imagine that thread A calls rte_eth_dev_start() and as part of this
+ * call, a RTE_ETH_EVENT_INTR_RESET event gets generated and the
+ * associated callback is ran on thread A. In that example, if the
+ * application protects its internal data using locks before calling
+ * rte_eth_dev_start(), and the callback takes a same lock, a deadlock
+ * occurs. Because of this, it is highly recommended NOT to take locks in
+ * those callbacks.
+ */
typedef int (*rte_eth_dev_cb_fn)(uint16_t port_id,
enum rte_eth_event_type event, void *cb_arg, void *ret_param);
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2024-02-01 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-01 8:43 David Marchand [this message]
2024-02-01 10:08 ` Kevin Traynor
2024-02-06 20:33 ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-02-07 14:31 ` Kevin Traynor
2024-02-06 20:27 ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-02-07 15:29 ` Kevin Traynor
2024-02-09 16:07 ` Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-02-09 21:13 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240201084319.2687896-1-david.marchand@redhat.com \
--to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
--cc=ktraynor@redhat.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).