DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dariusz Sosnowski <dsosnowski@nvidia.com>
To: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>,
	Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>,  Suanming Mou <suanmingm@nvidia.com>,
	Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>,
	Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com>, <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 11/11] net/mlx5: remove unneeded device status checking
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 12:51:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240229115157.201671-12-dsosnowski@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240229115157.201671-1-dsosnowski@nvidia.com>

From: Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com>

The flow rule can be inserted even before the device started. The
only exception is for a queue or RSS action.

For the other interfaces of template API, the start status is not
checked. The checking would cause some cache miss or eviction since
the flag locates on some other cache line.

Fixes: f1fecffa88df ("net/mlx5: support Direct Rules action template API")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Ori Kam <orika@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_hw.c | 5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_hw.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_hw.c
index 979be4764a..285ec603d3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_hw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_flow_hw.c
@@ -3520,11 +3520,6 @@ flow_hw_async_flow_create(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
 	uint32_t res_idx = 0;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (unlikely((!dev->data->dev_started))) {
-		rte_flow_error_set(error, EINVAL, RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED, NULL,
-				   "Port must be started before enqueueing flow operations");
-		return NULL;
-	}
 	flow = mlx5_ipool_malloc(table->flow, &flow_idx);
 	if (!flow)
 		goto error;
-- 
2.39.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-29 11:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-28 17:00 [PATCH 00/11] net/mlx5: flow insertion performance improvements Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-02-28 17:00 ` [PATCH 01/11] net/mlx5: allocate local DR rule action buffers Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-02-28 17:00 ` [PATCH 02/11] net/mlx5/hws: add check for matcher rule update support Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-02-28 17:00 ` [PATCH 03/11] net/mlx5/hws: add check if matcher contains complex rules Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-02-28 17:00 ` [PATCH 04/11] net/mlx5: skip the unneeded resource index allocation Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-02-28 17:00 ` [PATCH 05/11] net/mlx5: remove action params from job Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-02-28 17:00 ` [PATCH 06/11] net/mlx5: remove flow pattern " Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-02-28 17:00 ` [PATCH 07/11] net/mlx5: remove updated flow " Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-02-28 17:00 ` [PATCH 08/11] net/mlx5: use flow as operation container Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-02-28 17:00 ` [PATCH 09/11] net/mlx5: move rarely used flow fields outside Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-02-28 17:00 ` [PATCH 10/11] net/mlx5: reuse flow fields Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-02-28 17:00 ` [PATCH 11/11] net/mlx5: remove unneeded device status checking Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-02-29  8:52 ` [PATCH 00/11] net/mlx5: flow insertion performance improvements Ori Kam
2024-02-29 11:51 ` [PATCH v2 " Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-02-29 11:51   ` [PATCH v2 01/11] net/mlx5: allocate local DR rule action buffers Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-02-29 11:51   ` [PATCH v2 02/11] net/mlx5/hws: add check for matcher rule update support Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-02-29 11:51   ` [PATCH v2 03/11] net/mlx5/hws: add check if matcher contains complex rules Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-02-29 11:51   ` [PATCH v2 04/11] net/mlx5: skip the unneeded resource index allocation Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-02-29 11:51   ` [PATCH v2 05/11] net/mlx5: remove action params from job Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-02-29 11:51   ` [PATCH v2 06/11] net/mlx5: remove flow pattern " Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-02-29 11:51   ` [PATCH v2 07/11] net/mlx5: remove updated flow " Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-02-29 11:51   ` [PATCH v2 08/11] net/mlx5: use flow as operation container Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-02-29 11:51   ` [PATCH v2 09/11] net/mlx5: move rarely used flow fields outside Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-02-29 11:51   ` [PATCH v2 10/11] net/mlx5: reuse flow fields Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-02-29 11:51   ` Dariusz Sosnowski [this message]
2024-03-03 12:16   ` [PATCH v2 00/11] net/mlx5: flow insertion performance improvements Raslan Darawsheh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240229115157.201671-12-dsosnowski@nvidia.com \
    --to=dsosnowski@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bingz@nvidia.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=matan@nvidia.com \
    --cc=orika@nvidia.com \
    --cc=rasland@nvidia.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=suanmingm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).